http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/sandbox/blueprint/
The bundle is roughly 200k for the whole blueprint implementation. SpringSource is implementing the RI (which will be spring-dm 2.0 afaik), so there will be at least two different impls. On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 17:29, Andrea Zoppello<[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Guillaume, > > I know Spring and Spring-DM an alternative component model, and i would just > say that spring is one of my favourite application framework. > > BTW i still prefer to use Declarative Services because it keeps my system > more light and even if Spring-DM is more superior about dependency > injection, DS is enough > powerful to me. > > As i know if understood well, probably the blueprint services ( derived by > spring-dm ) will > become a standard OSGi service specification, this is a very interesting > point. > > On the other side it will be very interesting to see if there will be > different implementations of this > specification. > > Could you point me to your implementation of "blueprint / rfc 124"?? > > Andrea Zoppello > Guillaume Nodet ha scritto: >> >> Btw, and just FYI, as I think you're familiar with spring, you might >> want to look at blueprint / rfc 124 instead of DS. It's way more >> powerful. This spec is heavily based on spring / spring-dm, but I'm >> working on an implementation at Apache too. >> >> On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 16:34, Andrea Zoppello<[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> >>> Hi All, >>> >>> In last weeks i've played a lot with declarative services and ds >>> factories, >>> and i could say >>> i'm very satisfied about that. >>> >>> BTW i'm still have a little doubt where i need to go in more further >>> details. >>> >>> In my system, i've both declarative services, and ds factories. >>> >>> In particular suppose that >>> >>> S1 - Is a standard declarative service ( not a component factories ) >>> F - Is a DS Component Factory >>> F1..FN are n instances created by F factory component >>> >>> And the suppose tha the factory component have a 1..1 dependency on S1 >>> >>> Now suppose i want to update the implementation of "S1", when i stop the >>> bundle exposing "S1" all >>> the services instances F1..FN created with the component factory F will >>> be >>> deactivaded. >>> >>> This is correct but i would like that when S1 will be restarted F1..F2 >>> will >>> be reactivaded again.. >>> >>> I suppose i need to handle this manually myself... but i'd like to >>> discuss >>> with the >>> community bwich is the best way to do that. >>> >>> >>> Thx >>> >>> Andrea Zoppello >>> _______________________________________________ >>> OSGi Developer Mail List >>> [email protected] >>> https://mail.osgi.org/mailman/listinfo/osgi-dev >>> >>> >> >> >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > OSGi Developer Mail List > [email protected] > https://mail.osgi.org/mailman/listinfo/osgi-dev > -- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet ------------------------ Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ ------------------------ Open Source SOA http://fusesource.com _______________________________________________ OSGi Developer Mail List [email protected] https://mail.osgi.org/mailman/listinfo/osgi-dev
