Yes. Somehow the immediate component has to know what Fn components to recreate. But I leave how that is done to you! :-) --
BJ Hargrave Senior Technical Staff Member, IBM OSGi Fellow and CTO of the OSGi Alliance [email protected] office: +1 386 848 1781 mobile: +1 386 848 3788 From: Andrea Zoppello <[email protected]> To: OSGi Developer Mail List <[email protected]> Date: 2009/06/16 12:10 Subject: Re: [osgi-dev] Declarative Services Question... Sent by: [email protected] Hi BJ, I'll try with your suggestion. At the moment i've a "DeployerService" that tracks all the component factories than use this to create services depending on the content of the file that will be put in the polled folder, the created service are dependent on S1. if i understand well your suggestion is to make this an immediate component and then make it dependent on S1 right??? Andrea BJ Hargrave ha scritto: > You could have an immediate component which depends upon S1 that is > responsible for creating F1..FN. > -- > > *BJ Hargrave* > Senior Technical Staff Member, IBM > OSGi Fellow and CTO of the _OSGi Alliance_ <http://www.osgi.org/>_ > [email protected]_ <mailto:[email protected]> > > office: +1 386 848 1781 > mobile: +1 386 848 3788 > > > > > From: Andrea Zoppello <[email protected]> > To: OSGi - Dev <[email protected]> > Date: 2009/06/16 10:39 > Subject: [osgi-dev] Declarative Services Question... > Sent by: [email protected] > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > Hi All, > > In last weeks i've played a lot with declarative services and ds > factories, and i could say > i'm very satisfied about that. > > BTW i'm still have a little doubt where i need to go in more further > details. > > In my system, i've both declarative services, and ds factories. > > In particular suppose that > > S1 - Is a standard declarative service ( not a component factories ) > F - Is a DS Component Factory > F1..FN are n instances created by F factory component > > And the suppose tha the factory component have a 1..1 dependency on S1 > > Now suppose i want to update the implementation of "S1", when i stop the > bundle exposing "S1" all > the services instances F1..FN created with the component factory F will > be deactivaded. > > This is correct but i would like that when S1 will be restarted F1..F2 > will be reactivaded again.. > > I suppose i need to handle this manually myself... but i'd like to > discuss with the > community bwich is the best way to do that. > > > Thx > > Andrea Zoppello > _______________________________________________ > OSGi Developer Mail List > [email protected] > https://mail.osgi.org/mailman/listinfo/osgi-dev > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > OSGi Developer Mail List > [email protected] > https://mail.osgi.org/mailman/listinfo/osgi-dev _______________________________________________ OSGi Developer Mail List [email protected] https://mail.osgi.org/mailman/listinfo/osgi-dev
_______________________________________________ OSGi Developer Mail List [email protected] https://mail.osgi.org/mailman/listinfo/osgi-dev
