Why not? :-)
-- 

BJ Hargrave
Senior Technical Staff Member, IBM
OSGi Fellow and CTO of the OSGi Alliance
[email protected]

office: +1 386 848 1781
mobile: +1 386 848 3788





From:   Felix Meschberger <[email protected]>
To:     OSGi Developer Mail List <[email protected]>
Date:   2010/11/02 14:34
Subject:        Re: [osgi-dev] [R4.3 Draft3] DS and Configurable<T>
Sent by:        [email protected]



Hi

Am Dienstag, den 02.11.2010, 14:21 -0400 schrieb BJ Hargrave:
> It would be good to do something here but it will have to be in the
> next release cycle. At this point we are quite full up with work for
> the Core/Compendium 4.3 release. 

Ok. Thanks.

Shall I report a bug to keep track ?

Regards
Felix

> -- 
> 
> BJ Hargrave
> Senior Technical Staff Member, IBM
> OSGi Fellow and CTO of the OSGi
> Alliance
> [email protected] 
> 
> 
>             office: +1 386 848 1781
> 
>             mobile: +1 386 848 3788
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> From:        Felix Meschberger <[email protected]> 
> To:        OSGi Developer Mail List <[email protected]> 
> Date:        2010/11/02 10:30 
> Subject:        [osgi-dev] [R4.3 Draft3] DS and Configurable<T> 
> Sent by:        [email protected] 
> 
> 
> 
> ______________________________________________________________________
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> Draft 3 of the R4.3 spec introduces a Configurable<T> interface to be
> able to provide "developer friendly" configuration objects instead of
> just Dictionaries (or Maps) to services.
> 
> I wonder, whether there are ideas already to extend this support to
> Declarative Services.
> 
> I could imagine that the search algorithm for activator methods
> (activate, modify, deactivate) is extended to include an Object
> parameter which would be an Interface type much like the type variable
> of the Configurable<T> interface.
> 
> The DS runtime would then have to get these configurations and build
> the
> configuration object from it.
> 
> WDYT ?
> 
> Regards
> Felix
> 
> _______________________________________________
> OSGi Developer Mail List
> [email protected]
> https://mail.osgi.org/mailman/listinfo/osgi-dev
> 
> _______________________________________________
> OSGi Developer Mail List
> [email protected]
> https://mail.osgi.org/mailman/listinfo/osgi-dev


_______________________________________________
OSGi Developer Mail List
[email protected]
https://mail.osgi.org/mailman/listinfo/osgi-dev

_______________________________________________
OSGi Developer Mail List
[email protected]
https://mail.osgi.org/mailman/listinfo/osgi-dev

Reply via email to