Here we go: https://www.osgi.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108
Regards Felix Am Dienstag, den 02.11.2010, 14:54 -0400 schrieb BJ Hargrave: > Why not? :-) > -- > > BJ Hargrave > Senior Technical Staff Member, IBM > OSGi Fellow and CTO of the OSGi > Alliance > [email protected] > > > office: +1 386 848 1781 > > mobile: +1 386 848 3788 > > > > > > > From: Felix Meschberger <[email protected]> > To: OSGi Developer Mail List <[email protected]> > Date: 2010/11/02 14:34 > Subject: Re: [osgi-dev] [R4.3 Draft3] DS and Configurable<T> > Sent by: [email protected] > > > > ______________________________________________________________________ > > > > > Hi > > Am Dienstag, den 02.11.2010, 14:21 -0400 schrieb BJ Hargrave: > > It would be good to do something here but it will have to be in the > > next release cycle. At this point we are quite full up with work for > > the Core/Compendium 4.3 release. > > Ok. Thanks. > > Shall I report a bug to keep track ? > > Regards > Felix > > > -- > > > > BJ Hargrave > > Senior Technical Staff Member, IBM > > OSGi Fellow and CTO of the OSGi > > Alliance > > [email protected] > > > > > > office: +1 386 848 1781 > > > > mobile: +1 386 848 3788 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > From: Felix Meschberger <[email protected]> > > To: OSGi Developer Mail List <[email protected]> > > Date: 2010/11/02 10:30 > > Subject: [osgi-dev] [R4.3 Draft3] DS and Configurable<T> > > Sent by: [email protected] > > > > > > > > > ______________________________________________________________________ > > > > > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > Draft 3 of the R4.3 spec introduces a Configurable<T> interface to > be > > able to provide "developer friendly" configuration objects instead > of > > just Dictionaries (or Maps) to services. > > > > I wonder, whether there are ideas already to extend this support to > > Declarative Services. > > > > I could imagine that the search algorithm for activator methods > > (activate, modify, deactivate) is extended to include an Object > > parameter which would be an Interface type much like the type > variable > > of the Configurable<T> interface. > > > > The DS runtime would then have to get these configurations and build > > the > > configuration object from it. > > > > WDYT ? > > > > Regards > > Felix > > > > _______________________________________________ > > OSGi Developer Mail List > > [email protected] > > https://mail.osgi.org/mailman/listinfo/osgi-dev > > > > _______________________________________________ > > OSGi Developer Mail List > > [email protected] > > https://mail.osgi.org/mailman/listinfo/osgi-dev > > > _______________________________________________ > OSGi Developer Mail List > [email protected] > https://mail.osgi.org/mailman/listinfo/osgi-dev > > _______________________________________________ > OSGi Developer Mail List > [email protected] > https://mail.osgi.org/mailman/listinfo/osgi-dev _______________________________________________ OSGi Developer Mail List [email protected] https://mail.osgi.org/mailman/listinfo/osgi-dev
