On 2/22/2011 12:35 PM, BJ Hargrave wrote:
> So as I understand it, the RSA use case for the extender is as
> follows (feel free to correct, I may not be stating things correctly):
RSA is not an extender. It does not read metadata from arbitrary
bundles and "extend" them by performing actions on their behalf. Don't
try and shoehorn RSA into the extender pattern. Tom was just
explaining the extender pattern and why the framework handles class
space consistency checks for them specially.
An RSA impl can take advantage of this support by using 2 bundles: one
for defining the implementation of the Service Factory and another for
a bundle context to register the service.
> Ok...thanks. I will look into both BJ's dynamic dummy code and this
My example is not a dynamic dummy. It is a static dummy.
Right, I see this now. But one question: Can the proxyBundle be *any*
other bundle or does it have to be a this static dummy bundle? i.e.
could it be (for example) one of the ECF core bundles?
Thanks,
Scott
_______________________________________________
OSGi Developer Mail List
[email protected]
https://mail.osgi.org/mailman/listinfo/osgi-dev
