Neil Bartlett <[email protected]> wrote on 2011/02/22 15:54:40: > > Could I just ask for clarification on the purpose of the dummy > bundle. The idea is to avoid importing ANY packages into the bundle > that publishes the proxy ServiceFactory... but this could also be > achieved by the RSA bundle itself being very careful about its own > dependencies. Is that correct?
No. > This extender support (for avoiding the class space consistency > check when the service factory implementation class is defined by a > different bundle than the one whose context is used to register the > service) is fairly recent so depending upon it will require more > recent framework versions. See the text in parenthesis above. A bundle that both defines the service factory implementation class and registers the service does not "look like" an extender and extendee bundle pair. -- BJ Hargrave Senior Technical Staff Member, IBM OSGi Fellow and CTO of the OSGi Alliance [email protected] office: +1 386 848 1781 mobile: +1 386 848 3788
_______________________________________________ OSGi Developer Mail List [email protected] https://mail.osgi.org/mailman/listinfo/osgi-dev
