Just that it sounds like a bug in the specification. While we're discussing this, I dislike the fact that this spec re-uses "service.pid" but places additional restrictions on it. I would have preferred using a different name such as "monitorable.pid".
Greetings, Marcel On Nov 21, 2011, at 12:36 PM, <chris.g...@k-embedded-java.com> wrote: > Does nobody have any thoughts on this? > >> Hi there, >> >> In 119.2 compendium, Version 4.2 I read that the length of the >> monitorable-pid "must fit in 32 bytes when UTF-8 encoded". (Given that >> all the characters allowed in the symbolic-name syntax encode as one byte, >> this would appear to mean that the length is limited to 32 characters). >> >> However in 119.7.2 it is stated that "The length of the PID must not >> exceed 20 characters". Am I missing something, or is there an >> inconsistency here? >> >> Best regards >> >> Chris Gray >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> OSGi Developer Mail List >> osgi-dev@mail.osgi.org >> https://mail.osgi.org/mailman/listinfo/osgi-dev >> > > > _______________________________________________ > OSGi Developer Mail List > osgi-dev@mail.osgi.org > https://mail.osgi.org/mailman/listinfo/osgi-dev _______________________________________________ OSGi Developer Mail List osgi-dev@mail.osgi.org https://mail.osgi.org/mailman/listinfo/osgi-dev
