Thank you Felix.

Do you know which mode of the framework classloader is required for
bootdelegation to work when embedded?

I tried the bootdelegation earlier, but I didn't not succeed. However, I am
running embedded so that may play into my issue.

Sincerely,
- Ray


On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 11:42 PM, Felix Meschberger <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Hi
>
> I think this bundle is just wrong: It is declared to not depend on com.sun
> classes and the com.sun.org.apache classes are repackagings to not collide
> with the official (and potentially newer versions) of these classes.
>
> And yes, we also generally do a boot delegation to com.sun.* and sun.* for
> the sake of supporting the javax.xml factories to be able to get to the
> implementation details.
>
> Regards
> Felix
>
> Am 06.08.2014 um 02:24 schrieb Raymond Auge <[email protected]>:
>
> An example of a osgi bundle which requires such packages is:
>
> javax.servlet.jsp.jstl [1]
>
> While I can certainly export all these packages from the system bundle by
> hand, I'm wondering there's any mechanism which might simplify the task,
> and the maintenance of such over time.
>
> [1] http://search.maven.org/#browse%7C-1002239558
>
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 5:16 PM, Raymond Auge <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> Is it wrong to use
>>
>> org.osgi.framework.bootdelegation=com.sun.org.apache.*
>>
>> - Ray
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 5:08 PM, Raymond Auge <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Specifically, I'm talking about
>>>
>>> com.sun.org.apache.*
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 5:03 PM, Raymond Auge <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> What's the best approach to allowing use of the com.sun.* xml packages
>>>> provided by Java SE?
>>>>
>>>> There's a huge number of packages there and listing them out is tedious!
>>>>
>>>> Note that the problem is not direct use of container classes, but
>>>> because the way the XML factories/providers handle creating impls.
>>>>
>>>> Someone must have tackled this before.
>>>>
>>>> Thoughts?
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> *Raymond Augé* <http://www.liferay.com/web/raymond.auge/profile>
>>>>  (@rotty3000)
>>>> Senior Software Architect
>>>> *Liferay, Inc.* <http://www.liferay.com/> (@Liferay)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> *Raymond Augé* <http://www.liferay.com/web/raymond.auge/profile>
>>>  (@rotty3000)
>>> Senior Software Architect
>>> *Liferay, Inc.* <http://www.liferay.com/> (@Liferay)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> *Raymond Augé* <http://www.liferay.com/web/raymond.auge/profile>
>>  (@rotty3000)
>> Senior Software Architect
>> *Liferay, Inc.* <http://www.liferay.com/> (@Liferay)
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> *Raymond Augé* <http://www.liferay.com/web/raymond.auge/profile>
>  (@rotty3000)
> Senior Software Architect
> *Liferay, Inc.* <http://www.liferay.com/> (@Liferay)
>
>
>
>
>  _______________________________________________
> OSGi Developer Mail List
> [email protected]
> https://mail.osgi.org/mailman/listinfo/osgi-dev
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OSGi Developer Mail List
> [email protected]
> https://mail.osgi.org/mailman/listinfo/osgi-dev
>



-- 
*Raymond Augé* <http://www.liferay.com/web/raymond.auge/profile>
 (@rotty3000)
Senior Software Architect
*Liferay, Inc.* <http://www.liferay.com> (@Liferay)
_______________________________________________
OSGi Developer Mail List
[email protected]
https://mail.osgi.org/mailman/listinfo/osgi-dev

Reply via email to