http://web2.stratfor.com/news/2004TER/Story.neo?storyId=240909

 Bombing in Damascus: Mossad or Amateurs?
Dec 14, 2004 1817 GMT

A small bomb exploded Dec. 13 in a car parked at a gas station in the
diplomatic district of Damascus, Syria, slightly injuring one
passerby. Realization that the car's occupants -- who had left their
vehicle just before it exploded -- were an unidentified Hamas member
and his daughter raised immediate speculation that this attack was the
work of the Israelis.

Israeli involvement cannot be completely ruled out, especially when
considering that Mossad agents have conducted similar operations in
the past. However, this attack was so poorly executed as to virtually
eliminate Mossad as the perpetrator. Mossad involvement becomes even
more improbable when the most recent assassination of a Hamas official
in Damascus -- likely an Israeli operation -- is taken into account.

In September, Izz el-Deen al-Sheikh Khalil was killed when a bomb
hidden under the driver's seat of his sport utility vehicle exploded.
That bomb was either set to go off when Khalil started his vehicle, or
was remotely triggered. The Dec. 13 bombing, on the other hand,
involved a timed device, according to Syrian security sources, who
theorize that the attack was botched because the perpetrators did not
expect the target to stop and leave his vehicle before the device
detonated. In other words, this clearly seems to be the work of
nonprofessionals -- possibly amateurs who were attempting to implicate
the Israelis.

If a car bomb is to be used successfully as an assassination device, a
certain degree of intelligence must go into the planning and execution
of the attack. The target's movement patterns must first of all be
well-documented, to both plan the attack and to ensure that the person
planting the device is not caught. The detonation also must be planned
to mitigate -- or to multiply, if that is the intention -- collateral
casualties. The best bomb therefore would be an improvised explosive
device linked to the ignition or a command-detonated,
remote-controlled explosive device.

Utilizing a remotely detonated device allows the attacker the luxury
of choosing where and when to set off the bomb, regardless of the
target's activities. In this case, the attacker could have waited for
the Hamas member and his daughter to return to their car after
stopping at the gas station. The failure to plan for an unscheduled
stop in their target's itinerary also seems to underscore this as the
work of amateurs -- and thus to eliminate the highly professional Mossad.

Furthermore, is seems almost ludicrous to think that Israel would act
so rashly in the diplomatic quarter of the Syrian capital. The target
easily could have been driving near embassies or diplomatic residences
when the timed device exploded. If Mossad used a timed device in an
assassination attempt it should consider itself lucky that the
explosion caused only minor damage

Israel has plenty of reasons for wanting to thin the ranks of its
Palestinian nemesis -- and has a track record of doing just that.
Hence, Stratfor cannot completely rule out the possibility of Mossad
involvement in this latest attack. However, we give Mossad more credit
than to stage an amateurish stunt like this. In fact, we have a hard
time believing that the Hamas member was supposed to die in the
bombing at all. Timed explosive devices cannot be relied upon to get
the job done properly when assassination is the intent.








------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Make a clean sweep of pop-up ads. Yahoo! Companion Toolbar.
Now with Pop-Up Blocker. Get it for free!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/L5YrjA/eSIIAA/yQLSAA/TySplB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Subscribe:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Reply via email to