http://www.dw-world.de/dw/article/0,1564,1511790,00.html

 


Europe's Terror Efforts Under Scrutiny

 

 

 






 




A year after the Madrid bombings, international leaders arrive in the city to 
discuss the on-going war on terror. The discussions may force the Europeans to 
take a long, hard look at their efforts since March 11, 2004.

 

As world leaders and officials arrive in Madrid for the International Summit on 
Democracy, Terrorism and Security on Tuesday, the European Union is bracing 
itself for an in-depth examination of its efforts in the fight against 
terrorism a year after the continent's most devastating attacks.

 

One year after bombs ripped through packed commuter trains during Madrid's rush 
hour on March 11, 2004, the diplomats arriving in the Spanish capital will 
spend four days assessing the consequences of the bombings and the initiatives 
that were born from the aftermath. The EU could find itself among those accused 
of not learning from the tragic events.

 

The attacks, which claimed the lives of over 200 people and injured more than 
1000, shocked the EU into life regarding its terror prevention tactics but with 
the first anniversary of Europe's largest terror atrocity on the horizon, 
Europe has largely failed to consolidate its powers and institutions and the 
responsibility and security of each country lies as before in the hands of the 
separate state governments. 

 

The extent of Europe's efforts is clearly illustrated by the limited powers 
enjoyed by Gijs de Vries, the Dutchman appointed the EU's anti-terrorism 
coordinator in the wake of the deadly Spanish attacks.

 

March 11 prompted new measures

 

In a similar way that the Sept. 11 attacks in the United States triggered 
emergency measures, the Madrid attacks also sparked a raft of initiatives 
including an accord on a European arrest warrant. Many of the new measures 
focused as much on fighting crime as much as terrorism.

 

"There was a temptation to do a lot to prove that we had value to add as a 
Union," said one EU expert. "But it allowed (us) to force through things which 
had been stalled by dressing them up as (being against) terrorism." 

 

Among the most immediate measures concerned clamping down on funding, even if 
the Madrid bombings only cost a reported â8,000 ($10,569). The limit above 
which cash being taken across borders has to be declared was lowered to 
â10,000.

 

EU countries have also been working to harmonize rules on keeping records of 
phone calls or electronic data transfer, obliging them to be held for at least 
a year as opposed to the couple of months currently usual.

 

Intelligence sharing issue a major constraint

 

But the toughest challenge has been the highly sensitive area of intelligence 
sharing. The EU decided that from Jan. 1, 2008 any information available in one 
country should be available in all other EU states. But this principle is 
complicated by the diversity of national rules, with for example certain 
information requiring judicial authorization in one country but not in others.

 

In general, intelligence services are reluctant to divulge information except 
within the framework of a bilateral agreement, for example like that between 
France and Spain in fighting the Basque separatist group ETA.

 

Lack of clarity in defining root problems

 

More broadly, the EU has vowed to fight the "roots" of terrorism such as 
poverty or lack of education. But here again progress has been limited: For 
example, while identifying key recruiting groups such as prisons or mosques, 
they have been unable to define a profiled type allowing them to forecast who 
might turn out to be a terrorist.

 

To coordinate all the initiatives, the EU created a new job: that of 
anti-terrorism coordinator given to de Vries, who works under EU foreign policy 
chief Javier Solana. His key tasks include pressing EU member states to 
transpose EU directives into national legislation, while also talking, for 
example, to Gulf states about funding sources and to US authorities about 
maritime safety.

 

De Vries has received a cool reception from some EU justice and home affairs 
ministers, notably Germany's Otto Schily. He is quite conscious of the 
limitations set around his office. 

 

"My responsibility is to ensure that the different councils (of EU ministers) 
work together," he said recently. "Security remains a national competence -- 
that is a political decision made by our leaders."

 

Europe shackled by its own structure

 

One insider added that there are structural reasons why the EU fight against 
terrorism is constrained: namely Europe itself. 

 

"It is too small because we don't have (terrorism) source countries like 
Pakistan or Somalia," he said. "It is too big compared with the flexibility of 
bilateral cooperation. And it is too diverse: For the Scandinavians, terrorism 
remains something exotic, down there in the South."

DW staff / AFP (nda)

 


 

 

 

 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Give underprivileged students the materials they need to learn. 
Bring education to life by funding a specific classroom project.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/FHLuJD/_WnJAA/cUmLAA/TySplB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: [email protected]
  Subscribe:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Reply via email to