<http://www.nationalreview.com/script/printpage.asp?ref=/hanson/hanson200503240801.asp>
The National Review
March 24, 2005, 8:01 a.m.
The Seven Faces of "Dr." Churchill
Academia's everyman.
Does Ward Churchill even exist?
Dr., Native American, original artist, serious scholar, combat veteran,
highly recruited and sought-after academic, ex-Weatherman mentor: How many
- if any - of these seven faces of our real-life Dr. Lao are true?
Professors outside the arts at major research universities are supposed to
have Ph.D.s. The phantom Ward Churchill does not. How he was hired,
promoted, and tenured without a doctorate is a mystery - the equivalent of
a high-school teacher credentialed with an AA degree, or a medical doctor
operating without an M.D.
Ward Churchill proclaimed that he is a Native American of various tribal
affiliations; he is not. Even his ridiculous costumes, occasional threats,
and puerile rants cannot disguise that fact.
He seems to be a pop artist of sorts, but his canvasses are not quite his
own either. Those of like political mind have praised his scholarship, but
much of what he writes seems derivative, or misrepresents or outright
plagiarizes others.
Churchill has spoken of the firsthand trauma of battle service as a combat
veteran, both as a paratrooper and as a sniper - among the most hazardous
of corps in the United States military. Once again, there is no such
evidence that he served in any capacity other than what his official duties
in a motor pool and as a projectionist entailed.
Embarrassed officials claim Churchill was sought after by other
universities - so they had to reel in this trophy catch before he got away
- but no one can find any proof other than Churchill's own mendacious
claims.
No one knows what to make of his various arrests, boasts of bomb-making,
trip to Libya, angry and traumatized ex-wives, braggadocio about petty
vandalism, tales of phone threats, and the variety of other sordid stories
that surround this fabricated man. Churchill's presence on campus is like
the weaving driver who is pulled over by the state police, who quickly find
no license, registration, or insurance, but plenty of warrants - and thus
wonder how many other paroled miscreants they've missed out there, one
accident away from being a public-relations nightmare.
So, again, does this Ward Churchill even exist?
Of course not: His faces are made up of whole cloth.
Yet instead of seeing Churchill as no man, it is better to envision him as
an academic everyman. In the alternate universe of the modern campus, any
collective imbalance of wealth, education, health, happiness, or almost
anything is explicable only in terms of deliberate present discrimination
and systematic past oppression.
Any other exegesis - cultural attitudes, individual preferences, bad
personal choices and behaviors, time off for child-rearing, bad luck - is
irrelevant. Indeed, to raise them is prima facie evidence of one's own
discrimination, intolerance, and racism, and can lead to the academic
guillotine. Ask Harvard president Larry Summers.
Instead, equality of result is to be mandated by a government that in turn
is to be instructed on how to do so by the university. Its cadres of
subsidized social scientists and humanists provide both the rigged
diagnosis and the lucrative therapy. Thus, to succeed on campus without a
degree or talent or much of anything, it is absolutely critical to be an
ideologue of the first order.
Churchill's rantings are full of leftist hyperbole, vicious Nazi
allusions, and calls for violence against the United States ("more 9/11s
are necessary") and an end to America itself ("There's no U.S. in America
anymore"). Should Churchill have been such a vicious court jester of the
Right and slurred gays and minorities as he did the victims of mass murder,
he would have been fired long ago.
Rule 1: Profess to be as far left as possible, understanding that extremism
in the service of utopian virtue is no vice.
Most academics are retiring sorts. They enjoy the tranquility of the campus
and its isolation from the conundrum of society at large. But like peaceful
sheep grazing in green pastures, they are easy prey for rapacious wolves.
Professors are especially vulnerable to a bully and showman like Churchill,
whose record of both oral and written intimidation leaves most disturbed,
frightened, or at least convinced to steer clear of this loose loud popgun
when he goes off.
Note then his evocation of past bomb-making, his photo-ops in fatigues
with obligatory machine gun, and his occasional brushes with the law.
Rule 2: Among the nerds and dorks, act a little like a Brando, Che, or
James Dean, a wild spirit that gives off a spark of danger, who can at a
distance titillate Walter Mitty-like admirers and closer up scare off the
more sober censors.
Victimization is essential to academic man. Under the warped tenets into
which affirmative action has devolved and the existing protocols of the
blame industry, at first glance this put a pink heterosexual American male
like Churchill in a seemingly tough bind. What cover or exemption, after
all, is there when his scholarship, teaching, or academic citizenship is
found wanting?
That dilemma Churchill solved brilliantly when he endowed himself with two
new unimpeachable personas: the noble but victimized Native American, and
the half-noble but nevertheless traumatized Vietnam veteran.
Both costumes were eerie in their cleverness: In Colorado, with its
Western heritage and abundance of Native Americans, the frontier past is
especially touchy and ripe for exploitation. And while it is harder for a
pale white man to simply declare himself one day black or Hispanic,
fraudulently identifying oneself as a quarter, eighth, or sixteenth
American Indian has been a roguish American pastime since the onset of
affirmative action. Even before that, 1950s Hollywood showed how quite a
lot of white people like Ward Churchill can indeed pass as Indians, if they
grow their hair long, get a beaded headband, and put on some tassels and
buckskins. But instead of the 1950s Kemosabe lingo, by 2005, the script had
evolved to add shades and scream about massacres, genocide, and getting
even.
If Malibu and Burbank actors playing braves and chiefs once taught
suburban Americans how to reinvent themselves as Nez Perce warriors, so too
Deer Hunter, Apocalypse Now, and Rambo reinvented the Vietnam veteran as
the misunderstood anti-hero. Under the changed protocols, the once-slurred
"war criminal" of the 1960s was in the '70s and '80s reinvented as a
sympathetic "victim" who was "used" by the military-industrial complex.
Indeed, the only other persona more faked by American con artists than the
Native American is the tortured Vietnam War combat veteran - especially on
the campus, where military service is rare and first-hand revelations of
its horror are at a premium, lending a hard masculine edge felt to be
sometimes lacking in the world of Volvo fender-benders, elbow-patched
tweed, and seminar droning.
In short, Churchill's Indian and Vietnam-veteran pseudo-affiliations -
replete with long hair, camouflage, and sunglasses getup - were worth at
least a Ph.D. from Harvard.
Rule 3: Whenever possible, reinvent yourself as anything but a white,
straight American male.
The short resurrected career of Bill Ayers, the former 1960s terrorist,
showed how nostalgic the tenured class is for the barricades of the 1960s.
The only thing that cut short Ayers's glitzy book tour in autumn 2001 was
the catastrophe of 9/11. That coincidence unfortunately reminded even the
most diehard SDS fans that terrorist killers and bombers are hardly
idealists but rather repulsive thugs and two-bit murderers.
Although most American males at the plant and office nearing their 60s are
thinking of grandchildren, Social Security, paying off the mortgage, and
Vioxx and Viagra, a post-menopausal Churchill sensed the romanticism of the
1960s that lingered among his colleagues and the mystery the period
connoted for a new generation of upscale, rite-of-passage college students.
Recalcitrant, unbending, immobile, a throw-back to a better, more
idealistic age - this is the rock-cut image that the perpetual '60s
professor taps into. And Churchill, with his photo-studio manufactured
profile, pageboy locks, occasional fake Indian name, hip street lingo, and
sassy banter did it better than any we've seen in quite a while - or at
least well enough to wow the flabby university committees that allowed him
to cash in.
Rule 4. Don't worry about the anti-capitalist's embarrassing six-figure
salary, plush job, lifelong guaranteed employment, and fondness for jet
travel and hotels. Just keep acting like an ageless denizen of the
Woodstock nation, professing to be a timeless dagger pointed at the heart
of money-grubbing square America.
So who really is this strange creature who calls himself Keezjunnahbeh? The
Paris Hilton of the campus, a Peter Sellers-like fraud in his own Being
There, or a Tony Randall turning into all sorts of strange beasts in Dr.
Lao's circus? He is nobody in fact, but also everybody in theory.
Perhaps it is best to think of Churchill as our aging portrait of an
academic Dorian Gray, in whom all the once-hallowed university's vices and
sins of the last half-century are now so deeply etched and lined.
- Victor Davis Hanson is a military historian and a senior fellow at the
Hoover Institution at Stanford University. His website is victorhanson.com.
--
-----------------
R. A. Hettinga <mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
The Internet Bearer Underwriting Corporation <http://www.ibuc.com/>
44 Farquhar Street, Boston, MA 02131 USA
"... however it may deserve respect for its usefulness and antiquity,
[predicting the end of the world] has not been found agreeable to
experience." -- Edward Gibbon, 'Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire'
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~-->
Take a look at donorschoose.org, an excellent charitable web site for
anyone who cares about public education!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/_OLuKD/8WnJAA/cUmLAA/TySplB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~->
--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic? Head on over to our discussion list, [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.intellnet.org
Post message: [email protected]
Subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods,
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,'
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
