Why tolerance is fading for zero tolerance in schools


By Kris
<http://www.csmonitor.com/cgi-bin/encryptmail.pl?ID=CBF2E9F3A0C1F8F4EDE1EE>
Axtman | Staff writer of The Christian Science Monitor 

March 31, 2005

HOUSTON - Unaware it had turned cool overnight, Eddie Evans's 12-year-old
son bolted out of the house in shirt sleeves. He was on his way to the bus
stop when his mother called him back for a jacket.

In third period the boy discovered that the three-inch pocketknife he had
taken to his last Boy Scout meeting was still inside his coat - a definite
no-no under the school's zero-tolerance policy. Unsure what to do, he
consulted a friend before putting the knife in his locker. The friend turned
him in and, after lunch, police arrested him and took him to a
juvenile-detention center without contacting his parents, according to
senate testimony.

Mr. Evans says the school then expelled his son for 45 days and enrolled him
in an alternative school for juvenile offenders. By the end, the First Class
Boy Scout, youth leader at church, and winner of an outstanding- student
award was contemplating suicide.

"All the teachers knew it was an honest mistake, but none of that mattered
because of the school's policy," says Evans two years later.

Evans is one of the many parents who are trying to change the state's Safe
Schools Act of 1995. In fact, Texas - one of the nation's toughest-minded
states when it comes to crime and discipline - is now at the forefront of a
small but growing movement to relax zero-tolerance policies enacted by
states in the 1990s.

More than a dozen bills that try to bring a less rigid approach to school
discipline have been introduced in the Texas legislature this session,
including one that requires school officials to consider a student's intent.
The bill is currently moving through the House of Representatives.

"We have seen a number of states toy with the idea of scaling back or trying
to make the process of school discipline more rational," says Bob Schwartz,
executive director of the Juvenile Law Center in Philadelphia. "But Texas is
ahead of the curve at this point."

Indiana, Mississippi, and Pennsylvania are also weighing the issue at the
legislative level this year, with the introduction of several bills aimed at
softening strict school-discipline policies.

"Just talking about it suggests that, if not a pendulum swing, a pendulum
creep is in play," says Mr. Schwartz, though he cautions that many states
have given their school districts discretion when it comes to discipline,
making the issue hard to legislate.

It's particularly difficult to talk about relaxing discipline right now, a
week after the school shooting on Minnesota's Red Lake reservation. But even
the Red Lake school district Superintendent Stuart Desjarlait has admitted
that zero- tolerance policies can't keep kids safe if a student is motivated
to kill.

"It goes to show that if something is going to happen, it's going to happen
- no matter what you do," he said at a news conference last week. Red Lake
High School was equipped with a metal detector, security cameras, and
guards.

While zero-tolerance policies took root nationally with the passage of the
1994 Gun-Free School Act, it wasn't until the shootings at Colorado's
Columbine High School in 1999 that school officials began rapidly expanding
the types of infractions that merit expulsion.

Today, they range from spitting to swearing to skipping school. Principals
and teachers say the intent is to head off bad behavior before it escalates
into violence. And, in fact, there is evidence that fewer weapons and drugs
are being brought on campus since zero-tolerance policies were enacted.
Violent crime on campus fell 50 percent between 1992 and 2002, according to
a federal report.

"Clearly if you are a classroom teacher dealing with disciplinary problems
that come as a result of doing your job, there are times when you need very
strong rules and regulations," says Gerald Newberry, executive director of
the National Education Association's Health Information Network.
"Unfortunately ... many school boards and school administrators
misinterpreted the intent of the law and began taking first graders out of
class for bringing nail clippers to school."

Further, he says, shrinking budgets have left schools without the means to
properly address children's emotional issues.

Defenders of the zero-tolerance approach say that, whatever its flaws, it at
least brings a measure of equality to punishment: A child at a posh suburban
school in theory faces the same consequences for "bad behavior" as does a
student from a more chaotic or disadvantaged environment. But detractors
point to a zero-tolerance report released last week by the Advancement
Project, a democracy and justice action group in Washington. Among its
findings was that minority students are often disproportionately affected by
strict disciplinary policies.

That has been particularly troubling to Rep. Dora Olivo (D) of Rosenberg,
Texas, who introduced nine disciplinary reform bills this session. "We know
so much about what works when it comes to helping children, yet we aren't
relying on any of that," she says.

Her bills include requiring school police to receive behavior-management
training, parents to be notified immediately after their child is removed
from class for a violation, and holding alternative schools accountable for
the standardized-test scores of their students.

One former Katy, Texas, high school student says he understands that
administrators are trying to create a safe environment, but that they are
going too far. A sophomore in 2001, he was late to biology class one day and
his teacher sent him to the office for a tardy slip. While he was gone, he
says, she asked the class to turn in their spiral notebooks - but no one
told him to turn in his notebook when he returned, and his grade dropped
from a B to a C.

So he scribbled her name on a piece of paper labeled "permanent list of
people who piss me off" - a joke, he says. He then tore up the paper and
threw it in the wastebasket. But by day's end, he was in handcuffs. He spent
the night in juvenile hall, having been declared a "terrorist threat," and
spent eight weeks in an alternative school.

"Zero tolerance is an absolute joke," he says. "I understand that it makes
teachers feel better, but it's making school almost like a prison."

Evans, too - the father of the 12-year-old - is concerned. "I don't know
what the solution is to stop these wackos from going into schools and
killing innocent children and themselves," he wrote in a recent e-mail. "But
I do know that abusing innocent forgetful 12-year-old Boy Scouts is not the
answer."

. Material from the Associated Press was used in this report.

 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
DonorsChoose. A simple way to provide underprivileged children resources 
often lacking in public schools. Fund a student project in NYC/NC today!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/EHLuJD/.WnJAA/cUmLAA/TySplB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: [email protected]
  Subscribe:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Reply via email to