http://www.smh.com.au/news/Opinion/Genocide-put-Annans-UN-beyond-reform/2005
/04/01/1112302233381.html


Genocide put Annan's UN beyond reform
By Michael Duffy
April 2, 2005


Set up to save the world, the United Nations has become, in some mysterious
manner, less than the sum of its parts. It is a machine that specialises in
destroying the sense of proportion of those who get too close to it.

I was reminded of this when reading a description of a recent meeting in
Geneva. Australia was being discussed by the UN's expert committee set up
under the convention on the elimination of all forms of racial
discrimination. The description was written by Howard Glenn, executive
director of activist group Rights Australia.

The UN committee has been critical of racial discrimination in Australia in
the past decade. This time round, Glenn wrote approvingly in On Line
Opinion, some members were none too impressed by the flimsy evasions of our
man on the spot. The Chinese member of the committee said: "All these
wonderful [government] programs, yet indigenous people seem dissatisfied.
Why is that?"

Glenn shows an admirable concern for people's wellbeing. It's just that the
irony of Australia being questioned by a country with China's appalling
human rights record seems to have escaped him entirely. The UN has been
plagued for decades by this problem of police states passing judgement on
democracies. Most activists think it is not crippling. (To paraphrase George
Orwell, only an intellectual could overlook the absurdity involved.) But it
has helped destroy the UN's reputation with ordinary people.

Advertisement
AdvertisementThis week the world's media was concerned about whether the
Secretary-General, Kofi Annan, would survive the latest report into his
son's involvement in the oil-for-food affair. You may recall Annan was the
head of UN peacekeeping in 1994 who told a subordinate in Rwanda not to
intervene in growing civil unrest, effectively green-lighting the murder of
more than 800,000 Tutsis. Annan says he was acting according to UN
procedures. Still, a lot of people were hacked to death with machetes. If
Annan's career could triumph over that setback - not to mention the massacre
of 8000 Muslims under UN protection in Srebrenica the next year - I don't
know why they even bothered to investigate his son's tiny role in the
oil-for-food scandal.

Annan will survive because he's proved a great success in maintaining the UN
as an organisation that is continually undermined by its member states yet
can be used by them as an excuse for global inactivity. With the end of the
Cold War and the economic boom of recent decades, the West has a renewed
capacity to help millions of people in poor countries. This could be done
relatively cheaply, as has been shown by Bjorn Lomborg and others in the
Copenhagen Consensus project, documented in their 2004 book Global Crises,
Global Solutions. But a dysfunctional UN pumps a miasma of despair into
global grand thinking, encouraging a lethargy and a meanness that suit many
in the West.

There's a far more important scandal affecting the UN involving
sex-for-food. It's received relatively little publicity, even though it
dwarfs what happened in Abu Ghraib prison, presumably because the
perpetrators aren't American. The trouble started in Kosovo, where UN
peacekeepers from Britain, France, Romania, Russia, Pakistan and elsewhere
have been the main clients for underage girls forced into prostitution.
Prostitution is illegal there, but UN forces are immune from prosecution.

In the Democratic Republic of Congo, UN forces have been raping girls or
having sex with starving boys and girls as young as 13 in exchange for food.
The soldiers involved include many from India and South Africa.
Investigations have found over 150 instances. Then there are the reports in
The Australian of Jordanian troops with the UN in East Timor five years ago
raping children, women and goats.

Too often the UN is part of the problem, not the solution, its
representatives preying on some of the world's most vulnerable people. The
recent book Emergency Sex and Other Desperate Measures is a shocking
indictment of the UN's failures by three people who worked for it in the
1990s. American lawyer Kenneth Cain recalls how, "When the Cold War ended,
the power of freedom, democracy and hope weren't abstract concepts. So we
piled into Somalia, Haiti and Bosnia [with] the sure knowledge that we were
on the right side of history." Then history started moving in the wrong
direction and "one million citizens we promised to protect died on our
watch".

Another of the authors, New Zealand doctor Andrew Thomson, got the job of
digging up the mass graves in Bosnia and Rwanda for evidence in case anyone
could be found to prosecute for the killings. "I set out to save lives and
have ended up collecting the dead," he reflects bitterly on his time with
the United Nations. When the women of Srebrenica spit in his face he notes,
"They're right to spit. What happened here is obscene. Barely a year after
the killings, we waltz back in under the same despised UN flag to clean up
the cadavers. I was naive to expect gratitude."

The lesson he offers from his experience is this: "If blue-helmeted UN
peacekeepers show up in your town or village and offer to protect you, run.
Or else get weapons. Your lives are worth so much less than theirs."

The United Nations does some good but too often it is just a lie or a fig
leaf or even a cause of evil itself. Over a long period it's proved
incapable of significant reform. Maybe it's time to abolish it and start
again.





----- 



------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Give underprivileged students the materials they need to learn. 
Bring education to life by funding a specific classroom project.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/FHLuJD/_WnJAA/cUmLAA/TySplB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: [email protected]
  Subscribe:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Reply via email to