"It's hard to believe, of course, that Russia's Defense Ministry is
seriously planning to fight the United States. There is another
problem, and that's the fact that the nation's strategists know no
other military scenario. And they don't want to develop any other
scenario for the simple reason that any maneuvers different from the
current ones, if they were conducted, would inevitably show neglected
military preparation and ineffectively spent funds."

http://www.mosnews.com/column/2005/08/22/wargames.shtml
Photo: http://www.mosnews.com/files/10303/putinAP.jpg

Cold War Games

Created: 22.08.2005 19:38 MSK (GMT +3), Updated: 19:44 MSK, 10 hours
17 minutes ago

Alexander Goltz

Yezhednevny Zhurnal

The Russian Army has been fighting all summer. From the North Caucasus
to the Kamchatka, from the Barents Sea to the Shandong peninsula,
thousands of troops and dozens of ships and planes are involved in a
series of war games. Of course, these aren't Soviet times, when on the
command of the Chief of Staff hundreds of thousands of soldiers would
pick up their rifles and start moving west. But it's still impressive.
Even the president was so impressed that after flying on the TU-160
strategic bomber and taking part in launching winged missiles that he
announced the army was experiencing nothing less than a renaissance
and then said that the Kremlin, not prepared to stop there, is intent
on further increasing the military budget — up to 688 billion rubles
(over $24 billion) in 2006.

It's probably nice for the president and the ordinary layperson to
know that things are finally going as they should in our army. That
the new winged X-555, in whose launchings Putin took part,
demonstrated an extraordinary precision as it hits the window of an
abandoned club now used as a target. That a strategic missile launched
from a submarine in the Barents Sea successfully destroyed its target
on Kamchatka. That the nuclear missile cruiser "Peter the Great"
brilliantly completed a shooting session. That Russian and Chinese
paratroopers are rehearsing a peacekeeping operation together. After
all, that's what armed forces are for: to perfect their military skill
and to demonstrate their might before their friends and foes.

It's left to determine, however, to what extent these war games
prepare the army to counter real threats. Describing all these
maneuvers, military officials insist that their aims are to teach
troops to battle terrorists. After all, three years ago, just after
Nord-Ost, Vladimir Putin ordered the Armed Forces to include
anti-terrorist training in their program.

However, judging from the maneuvers now taking place, these aims have
been left unrealized. What the Russian army is preparing for today
fits the scenario of a major traditional military conflict with a
traditional foe, when military action is conducted by traditional
armed forces. Most likely, this stage was conducted in July-August
during troop maneuvers in the Far East and North Caucasus military
districts. But the state of Russia's common-purpose forces leaves us
with doubt that they can stand up to the forces of a powerful nation.
The next stage is when aggression against Russia continues. And that's
when strategic bombers get involved, demonstrating nuclear strikes
using winged missiles on low-populated areas of the aggressor-state.
That was the stage that Putin took part in. At the same time, during
the strategic aviation stage, paratroopers land as a distraction. That
is what is happening right now in China. And if that doesn't work,
then the forces of the entire nuclear triad are implemented (this
year, it was symbolized by the launching of a missile from the nuclear
submarine missile launcher "Yekaterinburg"). Since the General Staff
doesn't plan anything farther that that, all this means the end of the
world.

Maneuvers like these have been conducted by the Russian Armed Forces
since 1999, ever since the NATO operation in Yugoslavia. These war
games are a warning to the West, and first and foremost to the United
States. Their "anti-terrorist" aims are merely a pretext. Take, for
example, the winged missiles that were launched in Putin's presence.
These weapons were created not just for precision strikes, but
primarily to get past the enemy's anti-ballistic missile system.
You'll have to agree that it's unlikely that an international
terrorist organization would have such a system. And, after getting
confused trying to explain the use of the strategic bomber "solely for
peacekeeping aims" in the Russian-Chinese maneuvers, Russian generals
began hinting at the necessity of fighting a certain nation that
supports terrorists. Such hints are telling.

It's hard to believe, of course, that Russia's Defense Ministry is
seriously planning to fight the United States. There is another
problem, and that's the fact that the nation's strategists know no
other military scenario. And they don't want to develop any other
scenario for the simple reason that any maneuvers different from the
current ones, if they were conducted, would inevitably show neglected
military preparation and ineffectively spent funds. For example, the
76th paratrooper division became fully professional a year ago, thus
becoming the first full-fledged standing formation. In the event of a
crisis it would be the first formation to be deployed. In light of
this, it would have been important to see how exactly the command is
planning to deploy this division — both of its regiments, and not just
a single company. It's clear that right now there are not enough
military planes for such a task. Are military officials planning to
"mobilize" civilian aviation or is there another means of getting the
paratroopers to the necessary region? In a scenario like this, the
president would have to play another role besides that of a
high-placed passenger aboard a strategic bomber. After all, he would
be the one who would have to decide to use military force, taking into
account all the possible consequences. Would Putin have been just as
impressed had he learned that the Armed Forces could not carry out his
command?

Indeed, the only way for the country's leadership to learn whether its
military spending is worthwhile is to start getting the military to
solve real problems, instead of artificially constructed games. But
President Putin is hiding from this challenge. He leaves it up to
certain "specialists" from the General Staff to choose priorities in
developing the nation's Armed Forces. And we can be sure that in the
coming years these specialists will do the only thing they know how to
do: preparing the army for a world war.

This article was orginally published, in Russian, here.
http://www.ej.ru/dayTheme/entry/1648





------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
<font face=arial size=-1><a 
href="http://us.ard.yahoo.com/SIG=12hstv727/M=362329.6886306.7839369.3040540/D=groups/S=1705323667:TM/Y=YAHOO/EXP=1124770172/A=2894321/R=0/SIG=11dvsfulr/*http://youthnoise.com/page.php?page_id=1992
">Fair play? Video games influencing politics. Click and talk back!</a>.</font>
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: [email protected]
  Subscribe:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Reply via email to