Correct.

  _____  

From: 
Sent: Thursday, October 06, 2005 12:14 PM
To: 'Bruce Tefft'
Subject: RE: Bengals learn nothing from Oklahoma University bomber incident


Bruce:
 
It's not the Bengals but the County!!. They learned nothing from the suit
against the Port Authority relating to the first WTC bombing (
<http://www.newsday.com/nyc-nyterr264443498sep26,0,5644090,print.story?coll=
ny-top-headlines>
http://www.newsday.com/nyc-nyterr264443498sep26,0,5644090,print.story?coll=n
y-top-headlines )
 
B

-----Original Message-----
From: Bruce Tefft [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, October 06, 2005 8:55 AM
To: Bruce Tefft
Subject: Bengals learn nothing from Oklahoma University bomber incident


http://news.cincypost.com/apps/pbcs.dll/artikkel?Dato=20051006
<http://news.cincypost.com/apps/pbcs.dll/artikkel?Dato=20051006&Kategori=NEW
S01&Lopenr=510060366&Ref=AR&Show=0&template=printpicart>
&Kategori=NEWS01&Lopenr=510060366&Ref=AR&Show=0&template=printpicart
 
  

Little yardage in meeting on Bengals dispute 

By Tony Cook
Post staff reporter 



ADVERTISEMENT
        
RELATED STORIES 

. Jags
<http://news.cincypost.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20051006/SPT03/5100603
13> toughest test yet


A meeting Wednesday between Hamilton County officials and Bengals
representatives about the controversial NFL mandate for game day pat downs
at Paul Brown Stadium concluded without a resolution to the issue.

Hamilton County Prosecutor Joe Deters and members of the sheriff's office
agreed to meet again with team officials.

"It was an informational meeting to explore possible remedies to the
National Football League requirement concerning pat down searches at Bengals
games," said Deters spokeswoman Jen Irey.

"Nothing was resolved today, but further discussions will take place in the
future."

The NFL is requiring its teams to conduct upper body pat downs of every
attendee for security reasons, but some Hamilton County officials are
worried the requirement might constitute an illegal search and seizure at
the publicly owned stadium.

"There are about 30 NFL teams where this is going on," said Bengals attorney
Stuart Dornette. "Almost all are in public stadiums. I don't think there is
a constitutional issue, period."

Suicide bombers are the concern, though no specific threats have been made
recently, he said.

"There are devices people can wear that blow up and cause a lot of people
harm," he said.

Deters said earlier this week the pat downs might violate the U.S.
Constitution if the county paid for the security.

Others, such as county commissioner Todd Portune, think the searches are
illegal even if the county does not fund them.

"In the absence of a legitimate threat assessment that indicates there is
something going on that warrants this personal invasion of liberty, it's
still a violation," he said.

"I would encourage them at the same time not to bow down to unlawful
activity by the NFL."

Attorney Janet Aberay, who has sued the team on behalf of ticket holders for
other reasons, said some fans have contacted her about the issue.

The Bengals agreed not to conduct the pat downs at the home game last
Sunday. The team plays in Jacksonville, Fla., this weekend, giving the
parties more time to discuss what will happen.

The next home game is Oct. 23 against the division-rival Pittsburgh
Steelers.



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Fair play? Video games influencing politics. Click and talk back!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/VpgUKB/pzNLAA/cUmLAA/TySplB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: [email protected]
  Subscribe:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Reply via email to