http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,542-2338979,00.html

Time and terror

Five years on, our cultural response to 9/11 is only starting to take 
shape




There are two remarkable features of Stairway B, a new documentary on 
the 9/11 attacks. One is an interview with a Manhattan firefighter who 
recalls being trapped in the stairway of the World Trade Centre's 
north tower as the building collapsed. Instead of the inchoate roar of 
destruction that observers might have imagined, he describes a 
terrifying rhythm: "You could actually hear the floors hitting one 
another - boom, boom, boom, boom," he says, " and I remember thinking 
to myself . . . 'Oh, this is it. We didn't make it'."
The other salient aspect of the film is its long gestation. Its story 
is a near-miraculous episode from an otherwise apocalyptic day, yet it 
took five years to reach American screens. The same is largely true of 
Oliver Stone's 9/11, while United 93, released earlier this year, 
shares the delay between galvanising moment and finished product, if 
not the uplifting ending. It ends, like the flight of the same name, 
in a smouldering crater in Pennsylvania.


That film would put viewers in "a near-perfect state of distress", 
Martin Amis wrote in The Times. Today, in our books pages, he switches 
his focus from 9/11's victims to its planners, and wonders at their 
sheer emptiness. Osama bin Laden, in particular, is an "omnicidal 
nullity". The verdict is unarguable. It also helps to explain Western 
culture's tentative and sometimes baffled response to a 
world-changing - yet surprisingly straightforward - catastrophe.
Few serious writers or film-makers have not somehow incorporated their 
reactions to 9/11 in their work since then. But fewer still have 
tackled it head on, partly for fear of being seen to exploit victims' 
grief or the pornographically violent stock of imagery produced by 
those murderous 100 minutes; and partly on the assumption that their 
audiences had already been fed a surfeit of news footage that needed 
little captioning. Stephen Spielberg, the world's most powerful 
director, eventually approached the subject, but via metaphor of H. G. 
Wells's War of the Worlds.
It was left to Bruce Springsteen, New York's own balladeer, to offer 
popular culture's first direct response to the atrocities. As he 
recorded The Rising, an album of raw lamentation, Hollywood shelved 
every project that touched on terrorism, and the West busied itself in 
learning about a very different culture that it feared it had 
misunderstood. Sales of Bernard Lewis's The Crisis of Islam soared.
When asked in 1949 for his view of the French Revolution, Zhou Enlai, 
Communist China's first prime minister, replied famously that it was 
"too soon to say". The same is doubtless true of the long-term impact 
of 9/11, but this much is already clear: it was a singular, 
unambiguous event, recorded in all its shocking immediacy from a 
thousand camera angles - and carried out by a "cornered troglodyte" to 
whom there is probably much less than meets the eye. As such, like 
Pearl Harbor, 9/11 may prove less engrossing to creative minds than 
its aftermath. Hollywood's next Vietnam will not be the twin towers, 
but Iraq. 




--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: [email protected]
  Subscribe:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Reply via email to