http://www.strategypage.com/htmw/htterr/articles/20060901.aspx
 

The Other Iraq 

September 1, 2006: Since the United States took the offensive in the war on
terror, nearly all the Islamic terror attacks have been in Moslem countries.
The American move in to Iraq and Afghanistan is an ancient tactic, and is
also called "forward defense," or "taking the war to the enemy." In addition
to Iraq, where Sunni Arab nationalists have joined forces with Islamic
radicals to try and gain control of the country, there is also lots of
Islamic terrorism in Pakistan, India and Bangladesh. There's some, but much
less, activity in places like Saudi Arabia, Afghanistan, the Philippines,
Thailand and Indonesia. 

Iraq is also ground zero in the war between the two sects (Shia and Sunni)
proclaiming themselves the competing leaders in the effort to establish a
worldwide caliphate (Islam rules the planet.) Al Qaeda is the most prominent
of the Sunni groups seeking to establish the caliphate, a Sunni led
caliphate. Iran, which has been ruled by Shia clergy for the last two
decades, wants a Shia led caliphate. Most Iraqis are Shia, but have been
ruled by the Sunni Arab minority for centuries. That, more than anything
else, is why the amount of terrorist activity is so high in Iraq. 

But the second most active front for al Qaeda is Pakistan, where there have
been about two dozen terrorist attacks a month this year. Like the attacks
in Iraq, the Pakistani ones average about four casualties (including one
dead) per attack. But in Iraq, some 3,000 people a month are dying from
various terrorist attacks. That's about a hundred times the level in Iraq.
However, both Iraq and Pakistan have a situation where the Islamic terrorism
is mixed in with other sources of conflict. In Iraq, the Sunni Arabs see
their economic well being as being heavily dependent on running the country.
And with all the oil money, it's something worth fighting, dying and,
especially, killing for. 

In Pakistan, the secondary factor is tribalism. While the tribes make up
less than ten percent of the countries population, they occupy vast border
(Iran, Afghanistan and India) areas. The tribes are used to ruling
themselves, and are armed with rifles and automatic weapons. The tribes are
culturally conservative, which is the main reason they are still tribes.
That includes religious conservatism. The tribes will shelter members of al
Qaeda and the Taliban, and join them as well. 

There is also some Sunni/Shia conflict in Pakistan, but not nearly as much
as in Iraq. That's mainly because the Pakistani Shia are a minority, and do
not live in the tribal territories. Thus the Shia are only at risk from the
smaller number of Islamic radicals found in urban areas. 

Without the support of a larger issue, Islamic terrorism has a hard time
gaining much momentum. That's the case in all the other nations mentioned.
Afghanistan, you might think, would be as receptive to al Qaeda as their
fellow Pushtun tribesmen across the border. But, to a large extent, they
aren't. That's because al Qaeda allied itself with the Taliban in the late
1990s, and became the enforcers for the Taliban. As a result, most Afghans
equate al Qaeda with a bunch of heavily armed foreigners, coming to punish
them for disagreeing with the Taliban. 

In the other nations suffering from Islamic terrorism, it's usually the case
the a much larger segment of the population is actively opposed to Islamic
terrorism. Thus outnumbered, al Qaeda battles on in a war they will
eventually lose. 




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: [email protected]
  Subscribe:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Reply via email to