Hogwash…

 

Bruce

 

 

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2006/10/19/uveil.xml

 

 


Muslim teacher awarded cash for 'injured feelings'


 

Last Updated: 6:11pm BST 19/10/2006

 


The Muslim teaching assistant who sparked a political
<http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml;jsessionid=RVQLXPF22THVJQFIQMGCF
GGAVCBQUIV0?xml=/news/2006/10/16/nfaith316.xml>  storm after she refused
<http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml;jsessionid=RVQLXPF22THVJQFIQMGCF
GGAVCBQUIV0?xml=/news/2006/10/14/nveil114.xml>  to remove her veil during
lessons, has won her employment tribunal case for victimisation against the
school which suspended her but lost her claims for discrimination and
harassment.


 

Aishah Azmi


Aishah Azmi, 23, received compensation but did not succeed in her
discrimination claim

Ms Azmi was awarded £1,000 for "injury to feelings" after she succeeded in
her claim of victimisation. But her claims of direct and indirect
discrimination, and her claim of harassment, were dismissed. 

Kirklees Council suspended Aishah Azmi, 24, after she refused to remove her
veil while teaching at Headfield Church of England Junior School in
Dewsbury, West Yorkshire. 

The school said face-to-face communication was essential for Ms Azmi's job
as a bilingual support worker. The case fuelled an ongoing debate about the
use of the veil and the way that the Muslim community integrates into
British society.

In a statement Mrs Azmi said she was considering an appeal against the
decision to dismiss three of her claims. "It is clear that discrimination
against me has taken place and I am disappointed that the Employment
Tribunal has not been able to uphold that part of my claim," she said.

"I am taking the advice of my legal team at Kirklees Law Centre and will be
looking to appeal against that decision. However, I am pleased that the
tribunal have recognised the victimising way in which the school and the
local education authority have handled this matter and the distress that has
caused me." 

She criticised the political involvement in the issue: "Sadly the
intervention of ministers in my case (against the ministerial code) makes me
fearful of the consequences for Muslim women in this country who want to
work."

Mrs Azmi has said she was willing to remove her veil in front of children -
but not when male colleagues were present. It emerged she had not worn the
veil during her job interview. 

Prime Minister Tony Blair said the veil row was part of a necessary debate
about the way the Muslim community integrates into British society. The
debate was sparked by the Leader of the House of Commons Jack Straw when he
said that the wearing of full veils - or niqab - made community relations
more difficult. 

On Tuesday, Mr Blair said the veil worn by hundreds of Muslim women in the
UK is a
<http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml;jsessionid=RVQLXPF22THVJQFIQMGCF
GGAVCBQUIV0?xml=/news/2006/10/18/nveil18.xml> "mark of separation" which
makes people of other ethnic backgrounds feel uncomfortable. Culture
Secretary Tessa Jowell described the veil as a "symbol of women's
subjugation to men" and suggested that women wearing it "cannot take their
full place in society". Mr Blair stressed that he was not suggesting women
should be ordered to remove their veils. He said he could "see the reason"
why Kirklees Council chose to suspend Mrs Azmi for refusing to remove her
veil in the classroom. While stressing that such decisions were a matter for
local authorities, he added: "I do support the authority in the way that
they have handled this." He went on: "Difficult though these issues are,
they need to be raised and confronted. "

Mrs Azmi claimed the school: 

*  Directly discriminated against her on the grounds of her religious belief
in that it treated her less favourably than it treats or would treat other
persons by requiring her to remove the veil, a practice she believes she
must observe according to her religion; 

*  Indirectly discriminated against her by applying a provision, criterion
or practice that puts her at a particular disadvantage due to her holding a
religious belief that she was obliged to wear the veil; 

*  Subjected her to detriments as a result of her making an allegation that
the school was acting in contravention of the regulations and/or suspected
that she was intending to bring a claim under the regulations 

*  Subjected her to a course of conduct that had the effect of creating
intimidating, hostile, degrading, humiliating or offensive environment for
her and should reasonably be considered to have had that effect. 

She succeeded only in her final claim, that of victimisation, and all three
others were dismissed by the tribunal. 

 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: [email protected]
  Subscribe:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

Reply via email to