http://www.theinquirer.net/default.aspx?article=36636
TSA "security" measures are internally inconsistent They don't do what they claim By Charlie Demerjian: Sonntag 31 Dezember 2006, 11:28 ONE OF THE more interesting things I noticed while unpacking my bags in a TSA security line for the 73rd time this year was that the new 'security' features are not even internally consistent. No, not a way to sleaze around them, just the simple fact that they don't do what they say. The two dumbest reactionary 'security' measures enacted recently are the remove all shoes and x-ray them and no fluids/gels. The first one may have a precedent, Richard Reid did try to blow up a plane with explosives in his shoes. The liquids/gels thing was comprehensively debunked, someone needed a press distraction, but even I forget what for. Basically, it never happened. In any case, the TSA put in place placebos to make us quake in fear, cheese us off, and generally do nothing for our security. If you look at what they do, it flat out does not work, much less do what they say. The purported purpose of removing your shoes is so you don't smuggle explosives in, and possibly so you don't hide a knife or other sharp object in there. Sounds good, right? Well, last time I checked, and I have enough chemistry under my belt to choke a horse, plastic explosives don't show up on x-rays. Duh! If you want to smuggle a knife through the security, it sure will be seen by the x-rays no question there. It will also however be picked up by the metal detector you walk through after you put your carry-ons though the x-ray machine. If the knife won't set off said detector, there is no incentive to hide it, put it in your pocket. Basically, the whole shoe removal thing is internally inconsistent. It does not do what it says, would not have prevented the attack it was meant to, and in essence does absolutely nothing other than to annoy and inconvenience travelers. The other one is no liquids and gels in carry ons unless they are less than 3.4oz and in a clear plastic bag under one quart unless it is a tuesday the 17th, then you are permitted 7.3oz, but if you are accompanied by a zebra named George which allows you 19.1oz bottles. Maybe I am making some of this up, but the rules sure seem arbitrary enough. This prohibits you from bringing a Coke on board, sealed or not, baby food and other medical items are technically exempt but make the hassle of getting on a plane even more extreme. Lets pretend that there was an actual plot to blow up a plane with liquid explosives, which there was not. What does putting the items in plain sight do again? What does x-raying them do again? Nothing. Really. If you want to bring prohibited items on board, you simply do so now, and they get x-rayed for no particular reason. There are explosives detectors in all security checkpoints, they are right behind the x-ray machines. If the TSA is worried about people bringing in explosives, shouldn't they use the machines designed to do just that? They are there, they detect bondo, I can personally attest to that when I brought a costume mask made out of it to Defcon, what a laugh riot that turned out to be. What the TSA is saying is that they may be expensive, slow and annoying, but they won't detect explosives. The quantity limits are a joke, if you can't think of 12 ways to get around that one in a minute you aren't trying hard. The TSA has to 'do something' to prevent this scourge that never was, so like the shoes, we are all being collectively punished. Our punishment will however not detect the crime. Don't get me started on the remove laptops and video cameras bit either. Having traveled extensively overseas, the US seems to be the only country that cannot train its baggage screeners to differentiate between a laptop and a laptop in a bag. The Netherlands, Germany, Japan and Taiwan all seem to have no problem picking out the lack of a bomb in a laptop when surrounded by x-ray transparent cloth. What it comes down to is that the TSA seems to react to every headline in the dumbest possible fashion. What they implement does not do what they want, or at least what they say it will. That would be fine if they realised this and backed away when it was obvious that they were spending millions of dollars hiring people to ask if you have any liquids or gels in your bag. I personally would prefer my share of this went to equip our troops properly in order to actually fight terrorism. For some unknown reason, once these ineffectual annoyances get put into place, they never get rolled back even when it is clear they do nothing. I have long past the point of appealing to governmental common sense, and am not sure what if anything can be done to fix these abject stupidities. Anyone got any thoughts? ยต Note: This was written in the Indianapolis (almost) International Airport. +++ -------------------------- Want to discuss this topic? Head on over to our discussion list, [EMAIL PROTECTED] -------------------------- Brooks Isoldi, editor [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.intellnet.org Post message: [email protected] Subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
