http://frontpagemagazine.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=26299

 


Terror's Surprise Loss

 

By Ralph Peters <http://frontpagemagazine.com/Articles/authors.asp?ID=2593> 

The new year is off to a bad start for Muslim extremists and their admirers
in the media: After only a few months in power, the Islamist regime in
Mogadishu collapsed overnight as Ethiopian troops drove out the fanatics. 

The global media line held that the Islamic Courts Council, which seized
power last year and immediately imposed Sharia law, was in firm control of
the country, with the legal government in Baidoa destined to fall. And
Somalia did become the new Terror Central, a safe haven for al Qaeda and a
strategic base for Islamist subversion in Africa. 

Then Ethiopia stepped in and spoiled the goat roast. 

Unconvinced by Western myths that military force is useless against
terrorists, Addis Ababa's troops intervened to support Somalia's
internationally recognized government against the jihadis. The no-nonsense
use of force worked. 

An Islamist regime that supposedly had broad support collapsed so quickly
the international media couldn't keep up: On New Year's morning, newspapers
warned that the Islamists, who'd fled Mogadishu, were digging in to defend
their "stronghold," the vital port city of Kismayo. By the time those
sanctimonious papers hit the streets, the hardcore extremists had
high-tailed it, their mass of recruits had deserted and the Ethiopian
military had gained control of Kismayo without a battle. 

Now the media line is that it was all a plan, that the Islamists intended
all along to fight a guerrilla war. Sure, right. We've heard this one
before, folks: The same pundits argued that Saddam never intended to fight a
conventional war, but had always planned to hide in a hole in the ground
while his sons were killed so he could eventually be dragged out by our
troops and hanged by his own people.

Will the Islamic Courts Movement resort to terror and guerrilla operations?
You bet. But trust me: They would've preferred to stay in power. The truth
is that they were shocked by the speed and resolve of the Ethiopian attack -
their al Qaeda advisers had grown used to dithering Western powers crippled
by our superstitious faith in the power of negotiations. 

The Ethiopians fought. And won. Could there be a lesson here? 

Of course, Somalia won't become the new vacation spot of choice for the
mega-rich - Somalis will show up with Kalashnikovs on the Day of Judgment.
Yes, the Islamists will default to terror. But, just as it's better to have
the Taliban raiding in the boonies rather than ruling Afghanistan, it's
vastly preferable to have Somalia's Islamists and their foreign-terrorist
allies conniving to regain power than to have them in charge of a
strategically located state. 

To Americans, Somalia is "Black Hawk Down" country, where our forces won a
lopsided military victory only to have President Bill Clinton surrender to
our enemies - the greatest single act of encouragement our government ever
gave to the Islamist movement. We picture Somalia as a poor, dusty,
war-ravaged place (all true) and as small, remote and unimportant (all
wrong). 

Somalia is the size of Texas with the Panhandle trimmed back; it has the
longest coast on the African continent - over 2,000 miles of shoreline
vitally positioned on the Indian Ocean and Red Sea. An artificial country
slapped together by retreating colonial powers (who pretended that endlessly
warring tribes would all just get along), its population by current guesses
is just under 9 million. 

The province of Somaliland, in the country's north, is peaceful, relatively
prosperous - and anxious to secede. But the international community insists
that all borders are sacrosanct. The United Nations would have preferred to
hand over Somaliland to the Islamists rather than accept the will of
Somaliland's people - who don't want a damned thing to do with Sharia law. 

The United Nations did formally recognize the national coalition government
- then, when faced with the Islamic Courts Council's aggression, did what
the U.N. always does when confronted with fanaticism and terror: Nothing. 

Fortunately, Christian-majority Ethiopia had had enough of Somali-backed
Islamist subversion among its Muslim minority. Despite its serious internal
flaws, the government of Prime Minister Meles Zenawi did civilization a
great favor by ignoring diplomatic table manners and confronting the
Islamists in Mogadishu. 

There's some history there - in the last half-century, Ethiopia fought (and
defeated) Somalia twice. Less-formal conflicts go back centuries. The only
sub-Saharan territory never colonized (the Italians tried and failed
miserably), Ethiopia is justly proud of its martial heritage. 

Of course, the Somalis are proud, too. Somali patience with an Ethiopian
military presence won't last indefinitely. There's turbulence ahead. But
that's still better than terrorists in power. 

For now, it's worth popping that leftover bottle of champagne. Somalia's
homegrown fanatics and their al Qaeda allies are on the run; the Ethiopian
military is hunting down wanted terrorists (including several implicated in
the bombing of our embassies in Kenya and Tanzania), and our enemies have
lost a safe haven, a money-laundering capital, a smuggler's paradise and a
launching pad for subversion. 

The ideal of a perfect, eternal victory - to which the media hold those who
battle terrorism - is an unfair standard. A win that overthrows a terrorist
regime, whether in Afghanistan or Somalia, is worth the fight, even if the
enemy can't be completely eradicated. Desperate terrorists struggling for
survival are always preferable to a terrorist regime in the capital city. 

There's plenty more trouble to come in the Horn of Africa. But the good guys
won this round, and nay-saying pundits can't put the terrorists back in
power in Mogadishu.

Ralph Peters served in the U.S. Army for over two decades and has traveled
extensively in Africa. 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: [email protected]
  Subscribe:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

Reply via email to