http://deseretnews.com/dn/view/0,1249,655191986,00.html

Army opens criminal probes of contractors

50 investigations target fraud linked to Iraq, war on terror
By John Heilprin
Associated Press
       WASHINGTON — From high-dollar fraud to conspiracy to bribery and 
bid rigging, Army investigators have opened up to 50 criminal probes 
involving battlefield contractors in the war in Iraq and the U.S. fight 
against terrorism, The Associated Press has learned.
       Senior contracting officials, government employees, residents of 
other countries and, in some cases, U.S. military personnel have been 
implicated in millions of dollars of fraud allegations.
       "All of these involve operations in Iraq, Afghanistan and 
Kuwait," Chris Grey, a spokesman for the U.S. Army Criminal 
Investigation Command, confirmed Saturday to the AP.
       "CID agents will pursue leads and the truth wherever it may take 
us," Grey said. "We take this very seriously."
       Battlefield contractors have been implicated in allegations of 
fraud and abuse since the war in Iraq began in spring 2003. A special 
inspector general office that focused solely on reconstruction spending 
in Iraq developed cases that led to four criminal convictions.
       The problems stem in part from the Pentagon's struggle to get a 
handle on the unprecedented number of contractors now helping run the 
nation's wars. Contractors are used in battle zones to do nearly 
everything but fight. They run cafeterias and laundries for troops, move 
supplies, run communication systems and repair weapons systems.
       Special agents from the Army's major procurement fraud unit 
recently were dispatched to Iraq, Afghanistan and Kuwait, where they are 
"working closely and sharing information with other law enforcement 
agencies in the region," Grey said.
       "Given the billions of dollars in contract dollars that have been 
and are being spent, it is our experience that our agents will detect 
millions of dollars in fraud before we are done," Grey said. "And just 
as likely, we will be instrumental in bringing back to the U.S. 
government millions of dollars in recoveries."
       One case involves an Army chief warrant officer accused of taking 
a $50,000 bribe to steer a contract for paper products and plastic 
flatware away from a government contractor and to a Kuwaiti company, 
according to an indictment unsealed Thursday in federal court at Rock 
Island, Ill.
       Prosecutors say the officer took the bribe while at Camp Arifjan 
in Kuwait, while he was the Army's food service adviser for Iraq, 
Afghanistan and Kuwait, according to the indictment. The officer is also 
accused of trying to smuggle $40,000 in undeclared cash into the United 
States on a December 2005 flight from Kuwait to Dover, Del.
       Other cases involve a government officer manipulating a contract 
in exchange for large bribes, a contractor making false claims against 
the government and an official accepting gratuities. The cases range in 
type, seriousness and complexity and involve contractors both inside and 
outside the United States.
       The Pentagon has viewed outsourcing a wide variety of military 
tasks as much more efficient, leaving troops trained in combat to the 
business of war.
       But the Government Accountability Office reported in December 
that the military has been losing millions of dollars because it cannot 
monitor industry workers in far-flung locations.
       The Defense Department's inability to manage contractors 
effectively has hurt military operations and unit morale and cost the 
Pentagon money, the GAO said.
       Some 60,000 contractors have been supporting the Army in 
Southwest Asia, which includes Iraq. That compares with 9,200 
contractors in the 1991 Persian Gulf War.
       Commanders are often unsure how many contractors use their bases 
and require food, housing and protection, according to the report. One 
Army official said the service estimates losing about $43 million each 
year on free meals provided to contractors who also get a food allowance.
       The new Democratic Congress plans to ramp up oversight of the 
billions of dollars being spent in Iraq, including dollars awarded to 
contractors. Rep. Ike Skelton, D-Mo., chairman of the House Armed 
Services Committee, has said he plans to target contractor abuse.

+++




--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: [email protected]
  Subscribe:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

Reply via email to