http://www.townhall.com/columnists/column.aspx?UrlTitle=prosecutors_discreti
on
<http://www.townhall.com/columnists/column.aspx?UrlTitle=prosecutors_discret
ion&ns=DebraJSaunders&dt=02/18/2007&page=full&comments=true>
&ns=DebraJSaunders&dt=02/18/2007&page=full&comments=true
Prosecutor's discretion
By Debra J. Saunders
Sunday, February 18, 2007
Last month, when Border Patrol Agents Ignacio Ramos and Jose Compean began
serving 11-year and 12-year prison sentences, respectively, for shooting at
a fleeing drug smuggler, many Americans were outraged that the federal
government would prosecute two agents for doing their jobs.
Their trial uncovered policies that seem designed to undermine success --
such as the rule that prohibits agents from pursuing a speeding suspected
smuggler without a supervisor's authorization. Drug smugglers know that if
they speed to the border, they'll likely get away.
<javascript:launchSlideShowWindow('/Photos/SlideShow.aspx?issue=-999&Content
Guid=a2ddab1f-ec3a-4437-81dd-21f7cbf3410f')>
But the real outrage in this story is how federal prosecutors used their
discretion to shelter a drug smuggler and go after two men who, at the
worst, should have been fired for shooting at the smuggler and then not
reporting what they had done. The outrage is that this case ever came to
trial.
Reading the trial transcript -- which was released Tuesday -- you can't tell
which witnesses seemed credible. Nor do you see drawings that show the lay
of the land on the afternoon of Feb. 17, 2005, when drug smuggler Osvalo
Aldrete-Davila drove a truck filled with 743 pounds of marijuana off a West
Texas road and then tried to run for the border when he encountered agent
Compean.
Did agents Ramos and Compean shoot at a man whom they knew to be unarmed? I
see reasonable doubt. Compean said that as Aldrete-Davila fled, the smuggler
turned toward him with a shiny object in his hand, so the agent fired back
in self-defense. Ramos said that he heard the shots while he was crossing a
ditch and could not see what was happening. Then, fearing for his partner's
safety, he fired one round at the suspect, who first dropped out of sight
and then was seen walking into Mexico and being driven away in a friend's
car.
I see how jurors could have seen the agents' failure to tell supervisors
about the shooting, their failure to tell other agents the suspect was
armed, and the fact that agents scooped up the spent shells when Ramos and
Compean realized they had engaged in a bad shoot. Hence the guilty verdict.
But there is no way to know for certain if Aldrete-Davila had a gun or a
cell phone in his hand as he fled. Yet U.S. Attorney Johnny Sutton's office
waged this prosecution based on Aldrete-Davila's version of events -- even
though the smuggler originally lied to a Border Patrol agent when he said he
was shot as he was simply returning to Mexico. He left out the drug
smuggling.
Later, when Aldrete-Davila was supposedly telling the truth, his story still
smelled. As Ramos' defense attorney, Mary Stillinger, said in court,
Aldrete-Davila claimed "he's a little mule, and he needed money for his
mother's doctor's bills, and he needed money to renew his commercial
driver's license"-- which was current. "He doesn't know who hired him. He
doesn't know where the stash house is."
Later, Stillinger added, Aldrete-Davila apparently abused the
border-crossing card provided by Uncle Sam to assist with the medical care
he needed because the bullet severed his urethra. She noted in court,
Aldrete-Davila "did it again in October, he personally took the load to the
stash house."
Was he smuggling again? Sutton replied, "To our knowledge, Aldrete has not
been arrested or indicted on any other loads." The records are sealed.
Oh, and Aldrete-Davila is suing the Border Patrol for $5 million. It doesn't
help the prosecution's credibility that Aldrete-Davila testified in court
that a family friend, the Border Patrol agent who started this
investigation, told Aldrete-Davila that he might sue the Border Patrol and
helped him find a lawyer -- which the agent denied.
In addition, three agents testified against Ramos and Compean (with limited
immunity for their role in the alleged cover-up), but none of them saw the
whole exchange. Two were too busy checking out the drug van to run to the
scene when they heard gunshots.
Sutton argues he has to prosecute when his office sees a crime. He told me,
"Of course, my office would have preferred to have sent the alien to prison
for his crimes, but when the agents broke the law, destroyed the crime scene
and covered it up, they made that impossible."
I do not countenance law enforcement officers shooting at unarmed suspects.
If that's actually what happened, Ramos and Compean should lose their jobs.
But a just government does not put men who have risked their lives in the
line of duty -- men who are not criminals, who did not premeditate their
misdeed and who have not been running criminal rackets on the job -- in
prison for more than a decade.
When you think of the considerable resources spent on this trial, so that
prosecutors could put behind bars two agents who may have screwed up
dangerously in the heat of pursuit and lied about it -- in order to help a
drug smuggler who has a financial incentive to lie -- you wonder where the
justice is. And you cannot see it here.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic? Head on over to our discussion list, [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.intellnet.org
Post message: [email protected]
Subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods,
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,'
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
