<http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=ODQzNjcwM2ZiM2FhNDE1MjY3NmNkMjMwNjAxNzBlYWM=>
 
http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=ODQzNjcwM2ZiM2FhNDE1MjY3NmNkMjMwNjAxNzBlYWM=
Au Revoir
By Laurent Murawiec,  8 May 2007

De Gaulle, Le Pen, and the Communist party have been expunged from French 
politics.



Good news for the French, good news for us: Nicolas Sarkozy's impressive 
victory in this weekend's French presidential election sounds the death knell 
of key components of French political exceptionalism.


GAULLISM AT HOMEŠ


First, the Gaullist exception  in both the domestic field and in international 
affairs has finally been done away with. Domestically, Gaullism has been 
terrible for the Right. In France, after 1945, the figure of General de Gaulle 
singlehandedly prevented the consolidation of a powerful and durable 
Christian-Democratic party as arose in Germany or Italy and as existed in 
Britain. Even after de Gaulle's retirement, his legacy prevented the 
often-attempted establishment of a conservative, right-of-center party. This 
fragmented the center and the Right, and forced a general shift to the center. 
The Right was softened, which in turn enabled the rise of an uncouth 
ultra-right in the form of Jean-Marie Le Pen, whose National Front took a large 
part of the conservative electorate.

Furthermore, de Gaulle essentially established a pact with the Communist party, 
which paralyzed the political landscape: Against an erratic coalition of 
Gaullists and Communists, it was virtually impossible to effect significant 
change. For the better part of fifty years, the Communist-dominated unions were 
like a lead balloon burdening the body politic, a powerful lobby on behalf of 
corporatist status quo.

No figure comparable to that of Mrs. Thatcher ever rose to break the back of 
the unions, no figure remotely comparable to that of Ronald Reagan ever 
appeared to free the political system  from the poisonous legacy of Gen. de 
Gaulle.  Sarkozy's ascent represents the consolidation of a genuine 
right-of-center force in French politics and the final vanquishing of the 
Gaullist exception.


ŠAND ABROAD

In international affairs, de Gaulle repeatedly broke ranks  with Atlantic 
solidarity;  he tried to sunder NATO  and flirted with Moscow.  De Gaulle 
foolishly France, with him at it head, as the leader of an international "third 
way" in which the "non-aligned" and the Soviet bloc would join him. The Islamic 
world, Latin America, and Asia would heed his anti-American call. De Gaulle's 
successors kept up that tradition, though with partial exceptions: President 
Pompidou improved relations with Richard Nixon somewhat; Socialist president 
Mitterrand  supported Reagan's deployment of the "euro-missiles" (but furiously 
opposed  missile defense). Jacques Chirac turned out to be the most virulent 
hater of America,  ready to go to almost any length  to harm the U.S.

Sarkozy's very first statement  upon being elected  pointedly emphasized a 
strong alliance with  and friendliness toward the United States.  This is an 
enormous change:
For the first time since the strongly Atlantic-oriented Fourth Republic, Paris 
will not be anti-American.  This does not mean that Sarkozy's France will be 
"aligned" with, or a mere appendix of, American diplomacy - in his speech, 
Sarkozy first underlined that he was "a good European" and favorable to a 
stronger Europe. Rather, it means that Sarkozy's France will stop trying to 
berate, harass, and scoff at the United States at every opportunity; that 
Sarkozy's France will stop trying to lead a worldwide anti-American coalition, 
as was the case under the bumbling but tenaciously noxious stewardship of 
Jacques Chirac. The professional America-loathers at the French foreign 
ministry, the Quai d'Orsay, will have to watch their step. Israel will be able 
to count on a more level playing field and less Islamophilia. Washington can do 
business with Nicolas Sarkozy, whereas Chirac only wanted to do injury to 
America. The European Union can again envision a center-right French-German 
leadership that is not intent on pitting the EU against America.

THE END OF LE PEN


The second French exception  that suffered a fatal blow Sunday is Jean-Marie Le 
Pen, a clever, oafish demagogue. By defying the politically correct denial that 
there was any problem at all with Muslim immigrants, with their wayward, 
violent, and inassimilable children, or with the ghetto-like "banlieues" - 
breeding grounds for drugs, criminality, and Islamic recruitment - Le Pen 
proved a powerful attraction for the popular electorate and dragged it away 
from the mainstream, which in turn strengthened the Left. Mitterrand and the 
Socialists underhandedly supported Le Pen so as to weaken the Right, which gave 
Le Pen an otherwise unattainable lease on life. The fact is that Le Pen's 
strength  was a mainstay of Socialist power. Deprived by Le Pen of more than 15 
percent of the electorate, the Right was politically weakened; with Le Pen 
unwilling to engage in coalition politics except on his own terms, the 
conservative camp was in poor shape. The farce of the 2002 presidential 
election, where all the Left voted for Chirac - "the crook," as they called him 
- in order to stop "the Fascist" Le Pen was the crowning tomfoolery of the 
French exception.

The portion of the popular electorate that supported Le Pen, at least 15 
percent of the whole, had shifted over decades from de Gaulle to the Communists 
and then from the Communists to Le Pen. Sarkozy's strategy, tested and 
steadfastly practiced over many years, much resembles Richard Nixon's recapture 
of George Wallace's electorate. Nixon did not deny, as the respectable elites 
did, that there were serious reasons for disaffection among blue-collar workers 
and disenfranchised whites. Sarkozy likewise stated the obvious, which the 
Chiraquist, as well as Socialist, elites were discounting - giving Le Pen, as a 
result, a monopoly on proclaiming that uncontrolled North African and West 
African Muslim immigration  had created a massive problem; that the withdrawal 
of police and justice from the high-density clusters of immigrant and 
second-generation Muslims and the abandonment by the authorities of the poorer, 
lower-middle-class French had worsened the problem; and that some major 
policy-shift was urgent.


MARGINALIZED FRINGES

On the abhorrent basis  of ideological racism  and hatred for "foreigners" (he 
even badgered Sarkozy for his Hungarian roots), Le Pen recognized the Muslim 
problem and spoke up strongly about it. In so doing, he strongly contributed to 
the disintegration of the Communist party, which was once one of the most 
vigorous in Western Europe, with a quarter of the vote and a powerful grip on 
labor: Le Pen stole the Communists' popular base. In the present election, Le 
Pen lost about half his electorate and the Communist candidate polled 2 percent 
of the vote.

The radical (Left or Right) hijacking of blue-collars has come to an end, even 
if various Trotskyites and Greens and sundry absurdists  managed to siphon off 
about 10 percent of the total vote  in the first leg of the election. In 
France, the fringe radicals are on the wane. Just as, in Germany, the CDU-CSU 
was wide enough a tent to include more nationalistic oriented voters, so it 
will now be in France.


THE END OF AN ERA

The exceptions of Gaullism, the Communist party, and Le Pen have been fatally 
weakened or eliminated altogether. The French body politic is ripe  for a 
thoroughgoing reshuffle, and this is what will occur now.  A new, post-Gaullist 
conservative pole will take shape around Sarkozy.  Should the new president go 
to the country  to acquire the parliamentary majority he needs,  he would 
consolidate a five-year majority for himself, enabling him to implement what 
priorities he will select, which, if the campaign is any indication, will 
represent a pro-market inflection (not revolution) in the étatiste policies of 
the French state.

The Socialist party  will be torn by defeat, by the exhaustion of the '68 
generation, by the failure of the post-'68 (Ségolène Royal's) generation to 
capitalize on even as calamitous a 12-year legacy  as that of the 
pseudo-conservative Chirac. The moderate, more Social-Democratic types in the 
Socialist party  have been signaling their willingness to deal with the center: 
Former Socialist government minister Bernard Kouchner, founder of the "French 
Doctors," is now talking of joining François Bayrou's new Centrist 
(Christian-Democratic) party. Claude Allègre, renowned geophysicist (and noted 
global-warming skeptic) and a former Socialist minister of Education, was 
spotted leaving Sarkozy's offices  a few days ago.

The grip of the "Sixty-Eighters" (soixante-huitards) on the political and 
cultural establishment  and the complete connivance between Gaullists, 
Communists, and '68ers on anti-American, anti-Israeli, anti-Christian, 
pro-Arab, pro-Muslim, pro-Russian, and pro-"third world" policies  has now been 
seriously weakened.
In his campaign, Sarkozy emphasized national identity and cultural roots  
(Judeo-Christian, Catholic, French, and Western) - subjects that drive the Left 
into fits of rage. The '68ers idolized cultural relativism and 
multiculturalism; the new president has no sympathy for their shibboleths. The 
virtues he stresses and the vices he attacks have nothing in common with the 
worldview of the '68ers.

With the end of its persistent and toxic "exceptions," from the so-called 
French social model  to the conceit of French international leadership, and 
with a new chief executive unburdened  by these follies, France will join again 
the ranks of reasonably governed nations.  Good news for the French, good news 
for us.


  - Laurent Murawiec is a senior fellow with the Hudson Institute in 
Washington, D.C. His next book, The Mind of Jihad, will appear next year.



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: [email protected]
  Subscribe:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

Reply via email to