http://www.ipsnews.net/news.asp?idnews=43308
 
 US-Iran Detente Viewed With Caution
By Meena Janardhan

DUBAI, Jul 25 (IPS) - The turnaround in Washington-Tehran ties is being
viewed with relief on the one hand and anxiety and anger on the other by
various quarters within the six-nation Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) bloc. 

In a major policy shift by Washington, a senior U.S. State Department
official attended the Jul. 19 Iran-EU talks in Geneva to discuss a package
of incentives offered by world powers to first suspend and then permanently
end Tehran's nuclear enrichment. More importantly, Washington is considering
a proposal to open a de facto embassy in Tehran, similar to the one in Cuba,
and send low-level diplomats for the first time in three decades. 

After U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice held a meeting in Abu Dhabi
on Jul. 21 with ministers and officials from the GCC -- comprising Bahrain,
Kuwait, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Oman and the United Arab Emirates (UAE) -- and
Iraq, Jordan and Egypt, to ease concerns, the UAE expressed readiness to
support all fforts aimed at achieving security, peace and stability in the
region. 

Endorsing this view, the 'The National' published from Abu Dhabi said ''the
news is not necessarily bad. One cannot miss the signs of a regional thaw,
but neither should we overstate them. There has been more stability in the
region than one would have expected a few years ago. Warring parties are
talking to each other everywhere. This is good news: the Gulf does not want
to see another war harm its citizens.economic development, nor does it want
a dramatic shift in the balance of power. It is the shared responsibility of
Iran and the U.S., but also of the larger world community to find a
reasonable compromise.'' 

Saudi Arabia's 'Arab News' felt, in an editorial, that ''there is no
guarantee that Iran will decide between confrontation and cooperation. But,
after all the threats and counter-threats, the fact that Iran and the U.S.
got together for the first time represents a huge turnaround for both and
provides distinct signs that a collision course is being averted''. 

''What has been said and done have not been figments of the imagination. The
recent Israeli military exercise; the Iranian test-firing of missiles in
reply; Iran's threat to block the Strait of Hormuz if attacked, were all
real and still have the world worrying,'' the Arab News editorial added. 

However, academics IPS spoke with viewed the developments with caution. 

''Contact with Iran should be encouraged, but it is too soon to tell what
the U.S. intention really is. There are still many in the White House who
see this as the last chance to fix the problem before the change of
administration,'' said Christian Koch of the Gulf Research Center. 

After the Geneva talks, Washington warned Iran that it has two weeks to
respond seriously to the international offer to halt its sensitive nuclear
work or face further ''punitive measures''. 

''Moreover, even if the U.S. does get seriously involved, the GCC would like
to be informed. Unfortunately, this is not the case in the current EU3
dialogue format. So, contact yes, but not at the expense of GCC interests,''
the director of international studies at the Dubai-based think-tank told
IPS. 

That's precisely what worries some like Ebtisam Kitbi of the UAE University.


While the rapprochement between the United States and Iran is good for the
world at large, it is certainly not good for the GCC countries, according to
the assistant professor of political science, because ''they will become
weaker with every step of Iran's empowerment''. 

''By negotiating with Tehran, Washington is trying to sell us (GCC
countries). After sidelining Iran for decades, the United States is now
facilitating the return of Iran into the mainstream of regional and
international politics. In fact, Iran is trying to reorient this region away
from Washington, which Washington itself is facilitating,'' Kitbi
complained. 

''It is rewarding Iran for continued defiance and punishing the GCC
countries for being good allies," she told the IPS. 

Alleging that the turnaround in the US-Iran ties is part of an
uncrystallised, yet mutually-beneficial exchange, Kitbi pointed out that the
United States is eyeing Iran first, for its oil resources to tame high fuel
prices; second, to counter China's growing influence in the region,
especially with the Shiite state; third, achieve a face-saving exit from
Iraq, where Iran is an influential player; and fourth, consolidate the
political gains made in Lebanon, where Iran is a key supporter of Shiite
Hizbollah. 

On the other hand, Iran gains by inching closer, first, to being officially
crowned as the undisputed regional superpower; second, keeping open the
option of pursuing its nuclear program at a later stage; third, continuing
to wield significant influence over Iraq, while spreading its Shiite
ideology in a Sunni-dominated region; and finally, ensuring regime survival,
the opposite of which has been Washington's goal for nearly three decades,
she added. 

The third factor is particularly worrisome for Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and
Bahrain, which have large Shiite populations, which could become a source of
instability in the future. 

Reflecting the tension, Shiite clerics in Saudi Arabia criticised earlier
this month a religious edict issued by Sunni counterparts branding the
Shiite branch of having ''infidel precepts'', saying that its authors were
suffering from psychological problems. 

The fact that Iraq participated in the Abu Dhabi meeting with Rice could be
linked to the efforts aimed at bridging the sectarian divide. Baghdad's
participation is being seen as a signal of Sunni Arab leaders' willingness
to consult Iraq's Shiite-dominated government amid a reconciliation process
that witnessed the return of six Sunni ministers to the Iraq coalition this
week. 

While the GCC governments have encouraged the Western powers to pursue
diplomatic efforts, they have also been very open to warming up to Iran in
recent years to keep war at bay not only to maintain the prevailing economic
boom, but also to respect Arab public sympathy for Iran because of its
stance against the United States and Israel. 

''The GCC countries should remember that the Dutch, Portuguese and British
were in this region for about a century each. If history teaches anything,
it may be that the American century is about to end too. On the other hand,
Iranians and Arabs have lived together in this region for thousands of years
and will continue to do so,'' Iranian-born academic Ali Sheikholeslami told
IPS. 

''During the Iran-Iraq war, the GCC countries spent nearly 100 billion US
dollars to support Saddam Hussein. Iranians now expect the GCC countries to
show goodwill to compensate for the past,'' added the emeritus professor at
Oxford University in Britain. 

Kitbi of the UAE University summed up the situation thus: "On the whole, we
are back at square one. We may be further from war than before, but closer
to being dominated by Iran. In this tragic reality, the GCC countries suffer
either way." 


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


------------------------------------

--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: [email protected]
  Subscribe:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtmlYahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to