http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/4610

Biden flatly refuses to designate the IRGC as a terrorist organization


Joe Biden, friend of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps
  By W. Thomas Smith Jr.
Saturday, August 23, 2008

Sen. Joe Biden - Barack Obama's eagerly anticipated running mate - should be
named an honorary soldier in Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps
(IRGC).  We're all familiar with the IRGC: Iran's unique corps of Islamist
fighters who have been directly involved in deadly attacks against U.S.
soldiers in Iraq - even Afghanistan - threatening our ships in the Persian
Gulf; and organizing, training, equipping, funding, and providing direct
operational support to Lebanon-based Hezbollah (perhaps the most dangerous
terrorist army on earth). And that's just for starters.

Also known as the Pasdaran, the IRGC is not Iran's conventional territorial
armed force, but the military force of the Khomeinist-inspired Islamic
Revolution.  The organization fields an army, a navy, and an air force, as
well as an extranational special-operations force known as the Quds
(Jerusalem) Force.

Iran, of course, is a "state sponsor of terrorism," so-designated by the
U.S. State Department back in 1984.  And the IRGC and its Quds Force were
both designated "supporters of terrorism" in October 2007.  Though the
latter two designations would not have been so had Biden had his way.

On September 26, 2007, Biden voted "Nay" to Senate Amendment 3017 (S.
Amdt. 3017) - a piece of legislation amending S. Amdt. 2011 to H.R. 1585 -
"to express the sense of the Senate regarding Iran."

In a nutshell, S. Amdt. 3017 called on the Senate to: "Support the prudent
and calibrated use of all instruments of United States national power in
Iraq, including diplomatic, economic, intelligence, and military
instruments, in support of the policy . with respect to the Government of
the Islamic Republic of Iran and its proxies."

And most importantly - for the sake of sanctions and the unequivocal denial
of any form of support to terrorists and terrorist supporters - the
amendment said, "the United States should designate the Islamic
Revolutionary Guards Corps as a foreign terrorist organization . and place
the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps on the list of Specially Designated
Global Terrorists."

The text of the amendment included Congressional testimony from
then-commander of Multi-National-Force Iraq Gen. David Petraeus, who said,
"Iran, through the use of the Iranian Republican Guard Corps Quds Force,
seeks to turn the Shiia militia extremists into a Hezbollah-like force to
serve its interests and fight a proxy war against the Iraqi state and
coalition forces in Iraq."

The amendment also included corroborating testimony from U.S. Ambassador to
Iraq Ryan Crocker; retired Marine Gen. James Jones, who chaired the
Independent Commission on the Security Forces of Iraq; Defense Department
and independent reports; the most recent National Intelligence Estimate on
Iraq at that time; captured Iranian documents; even the public comments of
Iranian president Mahmoud Ahmedinejad, who
said: "The political power of the occupiers [the United States and allied
foreign forces in Iraq] is collapsing rapidly.  Soon we will see a huge
power vacuum in the region.  Of course we are prepared to fill the gap."

Nevertheless, when it came time to vote on the measure, Biden said, "no."
Instead, he went on - in forthcoming speeches and blustering- to threaten
Pres. George Bush with impeachment if the president unilaterally attacked
Iran.

According to an article in New Hampshire's Seacoast Online: "Biden said the
best deterrent to prevent pre-emptive military action in Iran is to make it
clear, even if it is at the end of his final term, action will be taken
against Bush to ensure 'his legacy will be marred for all time.'"

So Biden threatens a sitting president of the United States with impeachment
and the marring of his legacy "for all time."  He warns against striking
Iran - a rogue terrorist-sponsoring nation that kills American soldiers,
refuses to curb its nuclear development program, serves as the primary
benefactor to Hezbollah, and threatens nations with annihilation.  And he
flatly refuses to designate the IRGC as a terrorist organization.

Obama, who didn't participate in the vote on S. Amdt. 3017, spoke out
against the amendment, calling it "excessively provocative."  But in an
attempt to cover himself and appear strong, pointed to his co-sponsorship of
the inconclusive Iran Counter-Proliferation Act (March 2007), which calls
for the terrorist-designation of the IRGC (There were actually 72
co-sponsors of that bill).  Fine.  It's one thing to propose and talk about
countering terrorism.  It's quite another to actively and aggressively
counter terrorism, pressing actions to conclusion, which Obama failed to do
and Biden blatantly refused to do.

Still Biden's refusal to name the IRGC a terrorist organization had its
supporters: Surely, the ayatollahs backed Biden's "nay" vote.  And among
Biden's colleagues was Sen. John Edwards who - in a Nov. 2007 campaign
speech - said he applauded Biden's vote, and in the same breath referred to
the IRGC as just "a government-run militia."  That was just a few days after
the IRGC and its Quds Force had been designated "supporters of terrorism" by
the U.S. State Department.

At any rate, S. Amdt. 3017 passed: No thanks to Biden who - by his rejection
of the amendment and threats aimed at a sitting president - clearly provided
indirect support to terrorists. Perhaps the word, "indirect," is letting him
off the hook.



------------------------------------

--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: [email protected]
  Subscribe:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtmlYahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to