Joe Biden, friend of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps <http://www.analyst-network.com/profile.php?user_id=554> W. Thomas <http://www.analyst-network.com/profile.php?user_id=554> Smith Jr. 23 Aug 2008 By W. Thomas Smith Jr. http://www.analyst-network.com/article.php?art_id=2375 Sen. Joe Biden - Barack Obama's eagerly anticipated running mate - should be named an honorary soldier in Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC). We're all familiar with the IRGC: Iran's unique corps of Islamist fighters who have been directly involved in deadly attacks against U.S. soldiers in Iraq - even Afghanistan - threatening our ships in the Persian Gulf; and organizing, training, equipping, funding, and providing direct operational support to Lebanon-based Hezbollah (perhaps the most dangerous terrorist army on earth). And that's just for starters. Also known as the Pasdaran, the IRGC is not Iran's conventional territorial armed force, but the military force of the Khomeinist-inspired Islamic Revolution. The organization fields an army, a navy, and an air force, as well as an extranational special-operations force known as the Quds (Jerusalem) Force. Iran, of course, is a "state sponsor of terrorism," so-designated by the U.S. State Department back in 1984. And the IRGC and its Quds Force were both designated "supporters of terrorism" in October 2007. Though the latter two designations would not have been so had Biden had his way. On September 26, 2007, Biden voted "Nay" to Senate Amendment 3017 (S. Amdt. 3017) - a piece of legislation amending S. Amdt. 2011 to H.R. 1585 - "to express the sense of the Senate regarding Iran." In a nutshell, S. Amdt. 3017 called on the Senate to: "Support the prudent and calibrated use of all instruments of United States national power in Iraq, including diplomatic, economic, intelligence, and military instruments, in support of the policy . with respect to the Government of the Islamic Republic of Iran and its proxies." And most importantly - for the sake of sanctions and the unequivocal denial of any form of support to terrorists and terrorist supporters - the amendment said, "the United States should designate the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps as a foreign terrorist organization . and place the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps on the list of Specially Designated Global Terrorists." The text of the amendment included Congressional testimony from then-commander of Multi-National-Force Iraq Gen. David Petraeus, who said, "Iran, through the use of the Iranian Republican Guard Corps Quds Force, seeks to turn the Shiia militia extremists into a Hezbollah-like force to serve its interests and fight a proxy war against the Iraqi state and coalition forces in Iraq." The amendment also included corroborating testimony from U.S. Ambassador to Iraq Ryan Crocker; retired Marine Gen. James Jones, who chaired the Independent Commission on the Security Forces of Iraq; Defense Department and independent reports; the most recent National Intelligence Estimate on Iraq at that time; captured Iranian documents; even the public comments of Iranian president Mahmoud Ahmedinejad, who said: "The political power of the occupiers [the United States and allied foreign forces in Iraq] is collapsing rapidly. Soon we will see a huge power vacuum in the region. Of course we are prepared to fill the gap." Nevertheless, when it came time to vote on the measure, Biden said, "no." Instead, he went on - in forthcoming speeches and blustering - to threaten Pres. George Bush with impeachment if the president unilaterally attacked Iran. According to an article in New Hampshire's Seacoast Online: "Biden said the best deterrent to prevent pre-emptive military action in Iran is to make it clear, even if it is at the end of his final term, action will be taken against Bush to ensure 'his legacy will be marred for all time.'" So Biden threatens a sitting president of the United States with impeachment and the marring of his legacy "for all time." He warns against striking Iran - a rogue terrorist-sponsoring nation that kills American soldiers, refuses to curb its nuclear development program, serves as the primary benefactor to Hezbollah, and threatens nations with annihilation. And he flatly refuses to designate the IRGC as a terrorist organization. Obama, who didn't participate in the vote on S. Amdt. 3017, spoke out against the amendment, calling it "excessively provocative." But in an attempt to cover himself and appear strong, pointed to his co-sponsorship of the inconclusive Iran Counter-Proliferation Act (March 2007), which calls for the terrorist-designation of the IRGC (There were actually 72 co-sponsors of that bill). Fine. It's one thing to propose and talk about countering terrorism. It's quite another to actively and aggressively counter terrorism, pressing actions to conclusion, which Obama failed to do and Biden blatantly refused to do. Still Biden's refusal to name the IRGC a terrorist organization had its supporters: Surely, the ayatollahs backed Biden's "nay" vote. And among Biden's colleagues was Sen. John Edwards who - in a Nov. 2007 campaign speech - said he applauded Biden's vote, and in the same breath referred to the IRGC as just "a government-run militia." That was just a few days after the IRGC and its Quds Force had been designated "supporters of terrorism" by the U.S. State Department. At any rate, S. Amdt. 3017 passed: No thanks to Biden who - by his rejection of the amendment and threats aimed at a sitting president - clearly provided indirect support to terrorists. Perhaps the word, "indirect," is letting him off the hook. [This article originally appeared in <http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/4610> Canada Free Press] (F)AIR USE NOTICE: All original content and/or articles and graphics in this message are copyrighted, unless specifically noted otherwise. All rights to these copyrighted items are reserved. Articles and graphics have been placed within for educational and discussion purposes only, in compliance with "Fair Use" criteria established in Section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976. The principle of "Fair Use" was established as law by Section 107 of The Copyright Act of 1976. "Fair Use" legally eliminates the need to obtain permission or pay royalties for the use of previously copyrighted materials if the purposes of display include "criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research." Section 107 establishes four criteria for determining whether the use of a work in any particular case qualifies as a "fair use". A work used does not necessarily have to satisfy all four criteria to qualify as an instance of "fair use". Rather, "fair use" is determined by the overall extent to which the cited work does or does not substantially satisfy the criteria in their totality. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. For more information go to: <http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml> http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml THIS DOCUMENT MAY CONTAIN COPYRIGHTED MATERIAL. COPYING AND DISSEMINATION IS PROHIBITED WITHOUT PERMISSION OF THE COPYRIGHT OWNERS. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] ------------------------------------ -------------------------- Want to discuss this topic? Head on over to our discussion list, [EMAIL PROTECTED] -------------------------- Brooks Isoldi, editor [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.intellnet.org Post message: [email protected] Subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtmlYahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
