Cowardly surrender monkey.
 
B
 

Barack Obama: it is no longer important to kill Osama bin Laden



http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/us_and_americas/article5520116.e
ce?print=yes
<http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/us_and_americas/article5520116.
ece?print=yes&randnum=1231982723758> &randnum=1231982723758
Tom Baldwin in Washington 

Send
<http://timesnews.typepad.com/news/2009/01/your-farewell-message-to-presiden
t-bush.html> us your farewell message for President Bush

Barack Obama last night suggested that removing Osama bin Laden from the
battlefiell was no longer essential and that America's security goals could
be achieved by merely keeping al-Qaeda "on the run".

"My preference obviously would be to capture or kill him," he said. "But if
we have so tightened the noose that he's in a cave somewhere and can't even
communicate with his operatives then we will meet our goal of protecting
America."

His comments, in a CBS interview last night, represent a significant
watering down of the "dead or alive" policy pursued by President Bush since
the terror attacks of September 11, 2001. They also appear to contradict Mr
Obama's own statements made in the election campaign.

As recently as October 7, in a presidential debate, Mr Obama said: "We will
kill bin Laden. We will crush al Qaeda. That has to be our biggest national
security priority."

But yesterday, the President-elect adopted far less aggressive language,
saying his "number one priority" was to protect America from further attack.

"I think that we have to so weaken [bin Laden's] infrastructure that,
whether he is technically alive or not, he is so pinned down that he cannot
function," he said. "And I'm confident that we can keep them on the run and
ensure that they cannot train terrorists to attack our homeland."

A new audio tape thought to be from bin Laden was broadcast yesterday,
taunting President Bush for leaving his successor "with a heavy inheritance"
that would force Mr Obama to choose between military defeat or drowning in
economic crisis.

Asked about the tape, Mr Obama confirmed that the focus of his national
security priority would be Afghanistan and the border region with Pakistan,
saying: "We took our eye off the ball when we invaded Iraq." He added: "We
have to put as much pressure on them as possible. I've already spoken to my
National Security team about how we're going to do that."

The White House dismissed the latest propaganda shot from al-Qaeda, saying
it reflected bin Laden's "isolation" and desperation to remain relevant at a
time when his ideology and mission are being challenged.

The tape, entitled "a call for jihad to stop the aggression on Gaza," was
played over a still picture of bin Laden and the Al-Aqsa Mosque in
Jerusalem's Old City, one of Islam's holiest sites.

Pointing to wars in Afghanistan and Iraq since the September 11, 2001
attacks, bin Laden said al-Qaeda was prepared to fight "for seven more
years, and seven more after that, then seven more...we are on the way to
opening new fronts".

He urged Muslims to "join hands with the mujahedeen to continue the jihad
against the enemy, to continue bleeding them", adding: "The question is, can
America continue the war against us for several more decades? The reports
and signs show us otherwise."

Joe Biden, the Vice President-elect, yesterday briefed Mr Obama after
spending this week on a Senate fact-finding mission to Iraq and Afghanistan.

He said: "Things are going to get tougher in Afghanistan before they get
better. There needs to be more resources to attend to in the situation of
Afghanistan."

Dick Cheney, the Vice-President has recently stated he still hopes to
capture of kill bin Laden before leaving office. "We've got a few days left
yet," he said on Friday.

Last night, however, in another round of interviews, Mr Cheney cited the
containment of the terror network as a major achievement of the past seven
years.

"Osama bin Laden is - wherever he is - he's in a deep hole. He does not have
much impact on the organisation as best we can tell. The important thing was
to go after the organisation, after al Qaeda" he said.

"Even if you got Osama bin Laden tomorrow, you'd still have a problem in
terms of whatever residue of al Qaeda is out there.

"The situation now obviously is that we've got to continue to be engaged in
Afghanistan. It's one of the most difficult places to work in because of the
territory, the geography, the terrain, but also because it's one of the
poorest countries in the world."


 
(F)AIR USE NOTICE: All original content and/or articles and graphics in this
message are copyrighted, unless specifically noted otherwise. All rights to
these copyrighted items are reserved. Articles and graphics have been placed
within for educational and discussion purposes only, in compliance with
"Fair Use" criteria established in Section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976.
The principle of "Fair Use" was established as law by Section 107 of The
Copyright Act of 1976. "Fair Use" legally eliminates the need to obtain
permission or pay royalties for the use of previously copyrighted materials
if the purposes of display include "criticism, comment, news reporting,
teaching, scholarship, and research." Section 107 establishes four criteria
for determining whether the use of a work in any particular case qualifies
as a "fair use". A work used does not necessarily have to satisfy all four
criteria to qualify as an instance of "fair use". Rather, "fair use" is
determined by the overall extent to which the cited work does or does not
substantially satisfy the criteria in their totality. If you wish to use
copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' you
must obtain permission from the copyright owner. For more information go to:
<http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml>
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml 

THIS DOCUMENT MAY CONTAIN COPYRIGHTED MATERIAL. COPYING AND DISSEMINATION IS
PROHIBITED WITHOUT PERMISSION OF THE COPYRIGHT OWNERS.

 
 


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


------------------------------------

--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, 
[email protected].
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[email protected]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: [email protected]
  Subscribe:    [email protected]
  Unsubscribe:  [email protected]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtmlYahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[email protected] 
    mailto:[email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to