http://www.newswithviews.com/Kincaid/cliff436.htm

 

RON PAUL HELPS OBAMA SLASH NATIONAL DEFENSE

 

 

By Cliff Kincaid
July 16, 2010
NewsWithViews.com

In line with Obama chief-of-staff Rahm Emanuel's admonition that no crisis
should go to waste, the Obama Administration is preparing to use the matter
of massive debt and deficits to push for drastic cuts in our national U.S.
military budget. The proposed cuts, which total $960 billion, could leave
the U.S. as a second-rate military power.

Playing a critical role in the effort is Rep. Ron Paul, who is generally
considered by his followers to be an opponent of Obama's liberal agenda. His
son Rand Paul is running for the Senate in Kentucky as a libertarian
Republican who believes in a strong national defense. 

Rep. Paul has called for a U.S. military withdrawal from Afghanistan and has
joined with the far-left in Congress to urge reductions in funding for the
war effort there. He calls the U.S. military effort to defeat Al Qaeda and
the Taliban an "occupation" of the country and "an ill-advised quagmire with
no end in sight." He says the effort is too expensive and won't be
successful. "It is time to leave Afghanistan to the Afghans to sort out," he
says
<http://www.house.gov/htbin/blog_inc?BLOG,tx14_paul,blog,999,All,Item%20not%
20found,ID=100712_3721,TEMPLATE=postingdetail.shtml> .

President Obama has already appointed a National Commission on Fiscal
Responsibility and Reform to look at long-term budgetary trends and vote on
a final report no later than December 1. The proposals are likely to include
massive tax increases, some minor spending cuts in domestic spending
programs, and major reductions to the U.S. national defense budget. 

The plan is being presented by the media as a bipartisan effort to make
"substantial cuts" to the national defense budget. 

Under the "Sustainable <http://www.comw.org/pda/fulltext/1006SDTFreport.pdf>
Defense Task Force" plan advanced by the so-called "odd couple" of Reps. Ron
Paul (R-Tx.) and Barney Frank (D-Ma.), the U.S. Navy would be cut to 230
combat ships (from a planned number of 313). Under President Reagan, the
U.S. had come close to achieving a 600-ship Navy. 

Other proposals include:

. Reduce the U.S. nuclear arsenal. 
. Slash spending on missile defense and space. 
. Retire two Navy aircraft carriers and two naval air wings. 
. Reduce F-35 fighter procurement by 220 aircraft. 
. Cancel or delay the Joint Strike Fighter. 
. End procurement of the MV-22 Osprey. 

Rep. Frank, one of the most left-wing members of Congress, created the
"Sustainable Defense Task Force" that came up with the cuts and worked in
cooperation with Reps. Paul, Walter Jones (R-N.C.), and Sen. Ron Wyden
(D-Ore.). Their plan is designed to serve as a model for Obama's proposed
cuts. 

The "left-right coalition" making up the membership of the group included
people from the Center for American Progress and the Cato Institute, both of
them funded by George Soros. Another member came from the pro-Marxist
Institute for Policy Studies.

Its members included: 

. Carl Conetta, Co-Director, Project on Defense Alternatives (Commonwealth
Institute) 
. Benjamin Friedman, Cato Institute 
. William Hartung, New America Foundation 
. Chris Hellman, National Priorities Project 
. Heather Hurlburt, National Security Network 
. John Isaacs, Executive Director, Council for a Livable World 
. Charles Knight, Co-Director, Project on Defense Alternatives (Commonwealth
Institute) 
. Larry Korb, Center for American Progress 
. Paul Martin, PeaceAction 
. Laicie Olsen, Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation 
. Prasannan Parthasarathi, Boston College 
. Miriam Pemberton, Foreign Policy in Focus, Institute for Policy Studies 
. Laura Peterson, Taxpayers for Common Sense 
. Christopher Preble, Director of Foreign Policy Studies, Cato Institute 
. Winslow Wheeler, Center for Defense Information.

The involvement of two officials of the libertarian Cato Institute confirms
our fears about the influence of what we called the "Progressive
Libertarians
<http://www.aim.org/aim-report/probe-the-progressive-libertarians/> ." These
libertarians, sometimes mistakenly referred to as conservatives, have often
collaborated with left-wing organizations and individuals, especially on
cuts to national defense and on the liberal social agenda. 

We noted, "The seeds of this strange collaboration of interests were planted
decades ago, when the pro-Marxist Institute for Policy Studies (IPS) held a
seminar under the title of 'Left and Right,' featuring Marcus Raskin of IPS
and Karl Hess, then an IPS fellow. The speakers at this 1969 event included
economist Murray Rothbard and Jeff Liebling, the latter identified as
'former Youth for Goldwater' and 'SDS member.' Hess, a former Barry
Goldwater speechwriter who died in 1994, traveled easily between left and
right."

A September 1970 IPS seminar on "U.S. Strategy in Asia" was organized by
Earl C. Ravenal, then an IPS Associate Fellow, who would later join the Cato
Institute as a distinguished senior fellow in foreign policy studies. A book
featuring the proceedings of the event reveals the participation of Morton
Halperin, then with the liberal Brookings Institution and now a top employee
of George Soros.

We noted that Justin Logan of the Cato Institute had appeared on the Glenn
Beck show along with another Cato scholar, Chris Edwards, who said that we
should "pull back the foreign troops" and drastically reduce the U.S.
defense budget. This will produce "higher security" for the U.S., he
claimed.

 

Sounding like an anti-war progressive, Edwards charged that sinister arms
manufacturers were pushing funding for unneeded weapons.

Obama had already cancelled the F-22 Raptor, the most advanced air
superiority fighter in the U.S. inventory, at a time when the Russians are
developing their own version of a fifth generation fighter.

The Cato Institute favored the Obama policy of killing the F-22.

On top of this cut, Secretary of Defense Robert Gates pledged on June 28 to
cut $100 billion from the military budget over the next five years.

The left-wing IPS, a key component of the "progressive" coalition backing
Obama, has been waging a campaign to have Obama veto more "unneeded weapons
systems" and is urging the President to make the defense cuts "much deeper"
than those already proposed.

 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, 
[email protected].
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[email protected]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: [email protected]
  Subscribe:    [email protected]
  Unsubscribe:  [email protected]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtmlYahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to