http://tinyurl.com/2c8bo22

 


L.A. Law Enforcement Conference on 'Radicalization' Features Islamist
Radicals Who Have Impeded U.S. Counterterrorism Efforts


 

 

WASHINGTON, Nov. 17, 2010 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ -- The following was
released today by The Investigative Project on Terrorism:

Two leaders of an Islamist organization, the Muslim Public Affairs Council
<http://www.investigativeproject.org/profile/181>  (MPAC), are scheduled to
lecture Southern California law enforcement officials Monday about
radicalization despite a history of opposing U.S. counterterrorism efforts. 

Salam al-Marayati and Edina Lekovic will join high-ranking officials from
all law enforcement agencies from Greater Los Angeles at the two-day
conference in Pismo Beach, Calif., entitled "Radicalization Conference 2010:
Radicalization and Homegrown Violent Extremism
<http://www.regonline.com/builder/site/tab2.aspx?EventID=890071> ."

Throughout its history, MPAC and its leaders have issued statements in
support of terrorist groups like Hizballah and, perhaps most significantly,
disseminating  incendiary statements that actually cause Muslims to be
radicalized. The group also has followed a consistent pattern
<http://www.investigativeproject.org/1785/mpac-pursues-islamist-ideology-in-
guise-of-civil>  of opposing U.S. counterterrorism efforts
<http://www.investigativeproject.org/1791/mpac-staunchly-defends-terrorists-
and>  and defending designated terrorist organizations and their supporters
<http://www.investigativeproject.org/1791/mpac-staunchly-defends-terrorists-
and> .

Those positions also involve perpetuating the false narrative that U.S.
policy is engaged in a war against Islam. MPAC has taken aim at many U.S.
counter-terrorism efforts and prosecutions. For example:

.         In a March 2003 Los Angeles Times article discussing the FBI's
relationship with Muslim American communities, al-Marayati attacked the FBI
for allegedly profiling only Muslims for prosecution, a demonstrably false
charge. "[T]he FBI's policy of targeting people because of their race and
religion.That's what they've been doing since the attacks, and we don't know
of any case that has resulted in the arrest, indictment or prosecution of a
terrorist," al-Marayati said.

.         Even though the LA Fusion Center - consisting of representatives
of the FBI, Los Angeles Police and Los Angeles Sheriff who exchange
intelligence - is hosting this conference on radicalization, MPAC frequently
criticized the creation and use of fusion centers. In April 2009, the
organization supported a statement released by the American Muslim Taskforce
on Civil Rights and Elections (AMT) calling for their elimination
<http://www.americanmuslimtaskforce.net/pView222b.html?action=viewPDetails&p
ageId=11102&pCatName=%20&pGrpName=%20&pT=Community%20Relations> : "We are
fully united in asking the Obama administration to address . use of
McCarthy-era tactics, most notably dissemination of Islamophobic analysis by
federally-funded 'fusion centers' to local law enforcement agencies."

.         MPAC has also targeted the FBI's use of informants and undercover
officers whom MPAC alleges instigate terrorist plots
<http://www.investigativeproject.org/documents/misc/358.pdf> . Despite the
fact that informants are widely used including in drug, gang, and organized
crime investigations, a February 2009 MPAC  press release argued
<http://www.mpac.org/programs/government-relations/fbi-losing-partnership-wi
th-american-muslim-community.php>  that "federal law enforcement cannot
establish trust with American Muslim communities through meetings and town
hall forums, while at the same time sending paid informants who instigate
violent rhetoric in mosques."

 

In April 2009, after federal authorities disrupted an alleged plot to bomb
synagogues and fire missiles at American military aircraft
<http://www.investigativeproject.org/documents/case_docs/990.pdf> ,
Al-Marayati continued his attacks against law enforcement. Asked in an
interview whether it was useful to have informants in mosques, Al-Marayati
replied
<http://www.investigativeproject.org/1449/salam-al-marayati-the-anti-anti-te
rrorist>  by suggesting that the defendants, later convicted, were not real
terrorist threats:

"These were individuals who were either petty criminals or gullible people
who were guilty of stupidity. They were not imminent threats to our country,
as the FBI has stated," Al-Marayati told Fox News. "We want those tax
dollars to be used to fight al-Qaeda."

In a 2003 counterterrorism paper, MPAC advocated
<http://www.mpac.org/assets/docs/publications/counterterrorism-policy-paper.
pdf>  the removal of Hamas, Hizballah, and the Palestinian Islamic Jihad
from the government's list of terrorist groups. The organization argued that
Washington's "preoccupation" with these groups "raises the question as to
whether targeting Palestinian groups serves true national security interests
or is based on political considerations."

And in one of the most high profile cases, MPAC repeatedly went to bat for
Sami Al-Arian, a University of South Florida professor arrested in 2003 for
allegedly serving as North American leader of Palestinian Islamic Jihad
(PIJ), a designated terrorist organization said to be responsible for the
deaths of two Americans and more than 100 Israelis. Yet, despite all of this
indisputable evidence showing Al-Arian to be an officer in a murderous
Islamic terrorist organization, MPAC and al-Marayati defended Al-Arian when
he was first arrested, protested that he was being put on trial and even
defended him after Al Arian pled guilty
<http://www.investigativeproject.org/documents/case_docs/70.pdf>  in 2006 to
one charge of making and receiving contributions of funds, goods, and
services to or for the benefit of the Palestinian Islamic Jihad. A month
earlier, al-Marayati had lauded Al-Arian at a fundraising dinner as a man
who "defied the odds in a system that is unfair," adding, "[T]here is no way
that you can get a fair trial in view of any of these issues today." 

However, the judge presiding over Al-Arian's case saw things differently.
Judge James S. Moody, Jr., said Al-Arian continued to lie about seeking
"only aid for widows and orphans. Your only connection to widows and orphans
is that you create them, even among the Palestinians."

One reason for MPAC's participation in the conference may be traced to the
involvement of Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department. Sheriff Lee Baca has
become a fixture at events sponsored by Islamist organizations
<http://www.investigativeproject.org/1861/house-hearing-on-extremism-caters-
to-islamists>  such as the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), and
frequently defends their radicalism
<http://www.investigativeproject.org/design/new/1863/defensiveness-dominates
-homeland-security-session> . 

During a House committee hearing earlier this year, U.S. Rep. Mark Souder,
R-Ind., questioned Baca on his close relationship with CAIR. The Los Angeles
Times reported
<http://articles.latimes.com/2010/mar/24/local/la-me-baca-muslim24-2010mar24
>  that Baca responded "When you attack CAIR. you attack virtually every
Muslim in America." Souder then noted the testimony of an FBI agent
<http://www.investigativeproject.org/documents/case_docs/1198.pdf>
identifying CAIR as a Hamas front. "I served in the United States Marine
Corps," Baca shot back. ".. CAIR is not a terrorist supporting
organization."

The record indicates otherwise. CAIR was listed as an un-indicted
co-conspirator
<http://www.investigativeproject.org/documents/case_docs/423.pdf>  in the
Hamas funding trial of HLF, been described in court
<http://www.investigativeproject.org/documents/case_docs/1199.pdf>  as a
Hamas front by an FBI agent and had its relationship with the FBI severed
<http://www.investigativeproject.org/985/fbi-cuts-off-cair-over-hamas-questi
ons>  based on exhibits which leave open the question
<http://www.investigativeproject.org/documents/misc/265.pdf>  "whether there
continues to be a connection between CAIR or its executives and HAMAS."

In featuring MPAC officials, who claim to speak for all Muslims, as speakers
before this prestigious law enforcement conference, the organizers and the
participants confer respectability on an organization that has helped foster
radicalization, not counter it. This action abets a deception deliberately
perpetrated by MPAC that it is a "moderate" group that is opposed to
Islamist terrorism. For a more extensive examination of MPAC's statements
supporting terrorist groups, its record of issuing incendiary statements
claiming that the FBI and USG are involved in "selective prosecution" of
Muslims simply because of their religion (see the IPT's dossier on MPAC here
<http://www.investigativeproject.org/documents/misc/358.pdf> .)  

Conference organizers are ignoring available evidence of MPAC's radicalism,
instead believing the organization to be an appropriate partner in
countering radicalism. Now it's time to ask whether the other organizers of
the event were aware of MPAC's history of radicalism and counter-productive
"counter-terrorism" assistance. And if they were aware, or did not bother to
ask questions since MPAC is so prominent in Southern California, what does
that say about the ability of these law enforcement groups to truly detect
threats to American society? 

SOURCE The Investigative Project on Terrorism

 

 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, 
[email protected].
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[email protected]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: [email protected]
  Subscribe:    [email protected]
  Unsubscribe:  [email protected]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtmlYahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to