http://www.redstate.com/laborunionreport/2010/11/17/tsa-unionization-an-32-m illion-annual-gift-to-union-bosses/
Another reward for union bosses; another slap in the face for Americans. Posted by LaborUnionReport <http://www.redstate.com/laborunionreport/> (Profile <http://www.redstate.com/users/laborunionreport/> ) Wednesday, November 17th at 11:00AM EST 11 Comments http://www.redstate.com/laborunionreport/files/2010/11/transportation_securi ty_administration_spoof-1-300x144.jpg When we have an administration more concerned about rewarding its union cronies than the U.S. Constitution (see ObamaCare for reference), giving union bosses access to the wallets of TSOs was only a matter of time. Now, the Transportation Security Agency's blue shirts who are doing Janet Napolitiano's bidding frisking, groping, molesting <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DXbCwlldqxI&feature=player_embedded> and seemingly sexually assaulting <http://amarillo.com/news/local-news/2010-10-11/lawsuit-airport-search-indec ent> the American public, are about to get license for further abuse-a union card <http://voices.washingtonpost.com/federal-eye/2010/11/tsa_employees_can_vote _on_unio.html?wprss=federal-eye> . In a significant victory for federal employee unions, the Federal Labor Relations Authority <http://www.flra.gov/> decided Friday that Transportation Security Administration <http://www.tsa.gov/> staffers will be allowed to vote on union representation. The decision clears the way for a campaign by the government's two largest labor organizations, the American Federation of Government Employees <http://www.afge.org/> and the National Treasury Employees Union <http://www.nteu.org/> , to represent some 50,000 transportation security officers. It was bound to happen. Before it became an agency known as Fourth Amendment violators, due to its critical national security responsibilities, the TSA was created in 2001as a non-union agency As labor attorney Jay Sumner notes <http://www.laborrelationscounsel.com/collective-bargaining/flra-grants-tsa- employees-right-to-elect-union-representation-but-not-to-collectively-bargai n/> : Enacted in 2001, the Aviation and Transportation Security Act (ATSA) provides that the Under Secretary of Transportation for Security has the power to, among other things, determine the compensation, terms and conditions of employment for employees who carry out security screening functions. Accordingly, in a 2003 memorandum, the Under Secretary declared that TSA officers, "in light of their critical national security responsibilities, shall not, as a term or condition of their employment, be entitled to engage in collective bargaining or be represented for the purpose of engaging in such bargaining by any representative or organization." While the Federal Labor Relations Authority (an agency that governs labor relations between the federal government and unions) recently granted permission to unionize the TSA, it has not yet ruled to give the unions collective bargaining rights-yet. But, it is only a matter of time <http://tsa.afge.org/pressreleases.cfm?PressReleaseID=1224> . "AFGE argued, and the FLRA agreed, that the right for employees to elect an exclusive representative and the right to engage in collective bargaining are two separate and distinct rights," AFGE National President John Gage said. "We have always said the choice to unionize and the task of winning collective bargaining rights at TSA would be a two-part process. "While we wait for the decision on collective bargaining rights that TSA Administrator Pistole has indicated will come soon, the election process can begin to move forward," Gage added. Here's some informal statistics for you: * Number of TSA employees eligible for unionization: 50,000 * TSA budget for FY 2010: $7.8 billion * Estimated Union Dues TSA unionization will provide union bosses at $50 per month: $2,500,000 per month or $30,000,000 per year. * Number of Americans whose Fourth Amendment rights have allegedly been violated: Thousands and still counting. * NUMBER OF TERRORISTS CAUGHT BY THE TSA: 0 [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] ------------------------------------ -------------------------- Want to discuss this topic? Head on over to our discussion list, [email protected]. -------------------------- Brooks Isoldi, editor [email protected] http://www.intellnet.org Post message: [email protected] Subscribe: [email protected] Unsubscribe: [email protected] *** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtmlYahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: [email protected] [email protected] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [email protected] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
