http://tinyurl.com/25crxtw

You Have To Pass This Amnesty To Find Out What Is In It
<http://links.heritage.org/ct/4980908:7553532505:m:1:155727206:46E4F0ECD3EED
5F5950D72504DDB2238> 

The nation’s unemployment rate stands at 9.8 percent
<http://links.heritage.org/ct/4980909:7553532505:m:1:155727206:46E4F0ECD3EED
5F5950D72504DDB2238> , a post
<http://links.heritage.org/ct/4980910:7553532505:m:1:155727206:46E4F0ECD3EED
5F5950D72504DDB2238> –World War II record 19th month that unemployment has
been over 9 percent. President Barack Obama is the largest tax hike in
American history. So what do Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D–NV) and
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D–CA) have Congress voting on today? Amnesty
<http://links.heritage.org/ct/4980911:7553532505:m:1:155727206:46E4F0ECD3EED
5F5950D72504DDB2238> . Specifically, the House and Senate will be voting on
the fourth and fifth versions of the DREAM Act
<http://links.heritage.org/ct/4980912:7553532505:m:1:155727206:46E4F0ECD3EED
5F5950D72504DDB2238> , which would legalize anywhere between 300,000
<http://links.heritage.org/ct/4980913:7553532505:m:1:155727206:46E4F0ECD3EED
5F5950D72504DDB2238>  and 2.1 million
<http://links.heritage.org/ct/4980914:7553532505:m:1:155727206:46E4F0ECD3EED
5F5950D72504DDB2238>  illegal immigrants.

Supporters of the DREAM Act claim the bill would provide citizenship only to
children who go to college or join the military. But all any version of the
legislation requires is that an applicant attend any college for just two
years. And if President Obama wants to reward non-citizen service members
with citizenship, he already has the power to do so. The Secretary of
Defense already has the authority under 10 U.S.C. § 504 (b) to enlist
illegal immigrants in the military if “such enlistment is vital to the
national interest,” and 8 U.S.C. § 1440 allows such immigrants to become
naturalized U.S. citizens, with their applications handled at accelerated
rates. The military component of the DREAM Act is a complete red herring.

Neither of these bills has gone through their respective committees, and
only one has been scored by the Congressional Budget Office. As a result,
they are chock full of loopholes designed by open border advocates to make
an even wider amnesty possible.

One bill would even grant Secretary of Homeland Security Janet Napolitano
the power to waive the college and military requirements if the illegal
immigrant can demonstrate “compelling circumstances” and the immigrant’s
removal would cause a hardship to the them, their spouse, their parents, or
their children. When exactly would removal from this country not cause a
hardship? What other loopholes are in these bills? As Speaker Pelosi might
say: “You have to pass this amnesty so that you can find out what is in it.”

The DREAM Acts are also an invitation for fraud. All of the bills would make
it illegal for any information in an amnesty application to be used to
initiate removal proceedings against an applicant. Law enforcement agencies
would be forced to prove that any information they used to find, detain, and
try to remove an illegal immigrant was already in their files before an
application was received or was not derived from the application. If an
illegal immigrant lies about his age to qualify for the program, and the lie
is never detected, he gets amnesty. And if the lie is found out, no
worries—law enforcement is forbidden from using that lie against him.

The real goal of the DREAM Act is to make it even harder for our nation’s
law enforcement agencies to enforce any immigration laws. And Congress is
not the only forum where amnesty advocates are working to undermine the rule
of law today. Right across the street from the Capitol, the U.S. Supreme
Court is set to hear arguments
<http://links.heritage.org/ct/4980915:7553532505:m:1:155727206:46E4F0ECD3EED
5F5950D72504DDB2238>  over an Arizona immigration enforcement law. This is
not a hearing on the controversial SB 1070 law that passed earlier this
year. This case, supported by the usual amnesty suspects (La Raza, the SEIU,
the Chamber of Commerce, etc.), challenges Arizona’s 2007 E-Verify
<http://links.heritage.org/ct/4980916:7553532505:m:1:155727206:46E4F0ECD3EED
5F5950D72504DDB2238>  law, which penalizes employers who do not verify the
legal status of their employees. This challenge by amnesty advocates to even
common-sense immigration enforcement measures should send a clear measure to
anyone wavering on the DREAM Act: Any enforcement mechanisms that DREAM Act
supporters agree to today will be immediately challenged in court tomorrow.
Enforcement is fickle; amnesty is forever.

Our country does need immigration reform. We need smarter border security,
stronger interior enforcement, and a more efficient naturalization system
<http://links.heritage.org/ct/4980917:7553532505:m:1:155727206:46E4F0ECD3EED
5F5950D72504DDB2238> . But amnesty plans like the DREAM Act undermine real
reform. The DREAM Act encourages people to ignore our borders, undermines
our law enforcement across the country, and makes fools of law-abiding
immigrants who play by the rules.

 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, 
[email protected].
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[email protected]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: [email protected]
  Subscribe:    [email protected]
  Unsubscribe:  [email protected]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtmlYahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to