http://travel.usatoday.com/flights/story/2011/02/Inexcusable-delay-on-TSA-bo
dy-scanner-safety-reports-/43484870/1

 

'Inexcusable' delay on TSA body-scanner safety reports 

By Alison Young, USA TODAY

Updated 1d 15h ago

 
<http://travel.usatoday.com/flights/story/2011/02/Inexcusable-delay-on-TSA-b
ody-scanner-safety-reports-/43484870/1#uslPageReturn>  54  |
<javascript:;> 16 

 <http://www.addthis.com/bookmark.php?v=250> Share 

The Transportation Security Administration has told members of Congress that
more than 15 million passengers received full-body scans at airports without
any malfunctions that put travelers at risk of an excessive radiation dose.

Despite the reassurance, however, the TSA has yet to release radiation
inspection reports for its X-ray equipment - two months after lawmakers
called for them to be made public following USA TODAY's requests to review
the reports.

TSA spokesman Kristin Lee says that the agency is still trying to ensure
that the reports don't contain any "sensitive security or privacy-protected
information" and that she expects they will be released "within the next few
weeks."

.         TSA:
<http://www.usatoday.com/travel/flights/2011-02-02-bodyscans02_ST_N.htm>
Agency unveils 'generic' body scans

The chairman of a House oversight committee on homeland defense calls the
delays "inexcusable."

"The public has a right to know, and there isn't something so sensitive that
requires holding it back," said Rep. Jason Chaffetz, R-Utah. Chaffetz has
sponsored legislation to limit the use of full-body scans.

The TSA's increased use of full-body X-ray scanners sparked traveler
concerns last fall about radiation safety. The TSA says the radiation dose
is tiny - equivalent to what a person receives during two minutes inside an
airplane at cruising altitude.

Fueling concerns about the potential for scanner malfunctions and the TSA's
ability to identify problems: a 2008 report by the
<http://content.usatoday.com/topics/topic/Organizations/Government+Bodies/Ce
nters+for+Disease+Control+and+Prevention> Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention that found the TSA and its contractors had failed in the past to
detect when some baggage X-ray machines were emitting excessive levels of
radiation or had safety features that were missing or disabled. The TSA says
that it has made improvements since then and that all of its X-ray scanners
- for people and luggage - have passed recent inspections by contractors.
The agency in January asked the CDC to repeat its luggage X-ray study "to
confirm the progress TSA has made," Lee says.

The
<http://content.usatoday.com/topics/topic/Organizations/Government+Bodies/Un
ited+States+Department+of+Homeland+Security> Department of Homeland
Security's inspector general is investigating the adequacy of the TSA's
X-ray inspection program at the request of Rep.
<http://content.usatoday.com/topics/topic/Ed+Markey> Ed Markey, D-Mass.,
Markey spokeswoman Giselle Barry says. TSA Administrator John Pistole told
Markey in a January letter that there have been no full-body scanner
malfunctions that resulted in "an actual or potential additional radiation
exposure."

The agency has more than 400 full-body scanners at airports. About half use
X-rays. The others use electromagnetic waves. The TSA, in a recent letter
responding to questions by Rep.
<http://content.usatoday.com/topics/topic/John+Dingell> John Dingell,
D-Mich., didn't say how many of the 15 million passengers went through each
type of machine. The passengers were screened between Oct. 1, 2009, and
Sept. 30, 2010.

 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, 
[email protected].
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[email protected]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: [email protected]
  Subscribe:    [email protected]
  Unsubscribe:  [email protected]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtmlYahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to