Obama Acts On Libya:
Pathetic, Paltry, Pointless By Lawrence W. White This article originally appeared in TJNP.com <http://TJNP.com/> <http://www.thejewishnewsplace.com/blogs/latest-posts/entry/obama-acts-on-li bya-pathetic-paltry-pointless.html> http://www.thejewishnewsplace.com/blogs/latest-posts/entry/obama-acts-on-lib ya-pathetic-paltry-pointless.html President Obama has finally spoken out on Libya, and has outlined a series of actions. But his words are pointless platitudes, and his actions do not indicate an awareness of urgency. Delay is unacceptable; innocent people are being slaughtered by Qaddafis forces every hour. ------------------------------------ After much dithering, President Obama has finally spoken out on Libya. He has condemned the violence; he has quoted a Libyan protestor in saying that the most basic aspiration of people is to be able to live like human beings. His press secretary has stated that Qaddafis " clear violations of human rights are totally unacceptable." How many of our great Presidents would resort to meaningless clichés? Would Truman, or Kennedy, or Reagan have uttered such an insipid statement? And Obama has acted. He has sent Hillary Clinton to meet with the Human Rights Council at the United Nations. This is the same Hillary Clinton who said a few days ago that the United Nations Security Council was where action on Libya should be decided; does this woman have the gravitas to be President some day?. And this is the same Human Rights Council that welcomed Libya as a member. Obama has also sent Undersecretary of State William Burns to several stops in Europe He has instructed his people to look at all options. He has promised to monitor, coordinate, consult. And to speak with one voice. He has warned the killers in Libya that that the entire world is watching. (I suspect Qaddafi knows this, and doesnt care. Why would he care, given Americas minimal response? When tyrants abuse their own people, they are usually aware that there is likely an audience; they then do it anyway) . He has warned the Libyan government that it will be held accountable for its failure to meet its responsibilities, and that it will face the cost of continued violations of human rights. Elliott Abrams <http://www.weeklystandard.com/print/blogs/obamas-pathetic-response-libya_55 2426.html> points out that he never said what those costs might be.. And he warned of other actions, Ive also asked my administration to prepare the full range of options that we have to respond to this crisis. This includes those actions we may take and those we will coordinate with our allies and partners, or those that well carry out through multilateral institutions. Yes, he will prepare, And yes, we will rely largely on the UN, a toothless and useless organization very much controlled by those who defend Islamic jihad. Two years ago, our administration was silent as brave Iranians challenged their leaders on the streets of Tehran. We were non-committal a few weeks ago on Egypt. And now Libya. Does this President stand for anything? Is there any cause he considers worth fighting for? Pundits, bloggers, and politicians have generally been critical of Obamas role in all this, including <http://www.commentarymagazine.com/2011/02/23/obama-on-libya-better-he-shoul d-have-said-nothing/> John Podhoretz , <http://www.weeklystandard.com/print/blogs/obamas-pathetic-response-libya_55 2426.html> Elliott Abrams, <http://www.facebook.com/notes/sarah-palin/heres-to-libyas-freedom/101500968 02933435> Sarah Palin, <http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/no-fierce-urgency-now-obama-libya_55244 0.html> William Kristol. and others In short, our President has uttered platitudes, and has acted to ensure that our government will play no role in the outcome. And all the while Col. Qaddafi continues to slaughter his countrymen. John Podhoretz <http://www.commentarymagazine.com/2011/02/23/obama-on-libya-better-he-shoul d-have-said-nothing/> has pointed out that it would have been better if Obama has said nothing. Meanwhile thousands of Libyans are being killed. Mercenaries recruited by Qaddafi are pouring into the country, eager to slaughter the anti-Qaddafi protestors. It is reminiscent of the foot dragging of our government in stopping the genocide that occurred during the early 1940s in Europe. There is absolutely no sense of urgency, even while every hour brings a higher death toll. As William Kristol <http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/no-fierce-urgency-now-obama-libya_55244 0.html> says, So Qaddafi flies in mercenaries to kill people. And Obama flies diplomats around to consult with other diplomats about whether at some point we might possibly stop Qaddafi from flying in mercenaries to kill people. We are stuck for at least two more years with a President whose leftist world view has no room for a superpower, especially if it is the United States . And so, Obama will consult with allies, and will go to the United Nations, where a refusal to act against an Arab leader is a given. What could we do? Plenty. We could Immediately enforce a no-fly zone in Libya, we could initiate an air attack on Qaddafis forces (Remember Reagan bombing Qaddafis palace after the Berlin discotheque bombing? ) A sense of urgency is critical for one reason; matters are urgent. People are getting killed every moment; delay should not be an option. . [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] ------------------------------------ -------------------------- Want to discuss this topic? Head on over to our discussion list, [email protected]. -------------------------- Brooks Isoldi, editor [email protected] http://www.intellnet.org Post message: [email protected] Subscribe: [email protected] Unsubscribe: [email protected] *** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtmlYahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: [email protected] [email protected] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [email protected] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
