Boko Haram Exploits Sectarian Divisions to Incite Civil War in Nigeria
Publication: Terrorism Monitor Volume: 9 Issue: 18
May 5, 2011 04:21 PM 
By: Jacob Zenn
http://www.jamestown.org/programs/gta/single/?tx_ttnews[tt_news]=37886&tx_tt
news[backPid]=26&cHash=e621d46bded4082a11391a6c7ee07df9

Boko Haram carried out a series of attacks in northern Nigeria during the
country's elections, which began on April 9 with legislative elections and
continued on April 16 and April 26 with presidential and gubernatorial
elections. While Boko Haram has typically targeted government buildings,
military facilities and major public events since the group began militant
attacks in 2004, many of its attacks in April – especially in the Borno
State city of Maiduguri – were clearly aimed at disrupting the voting and
campaigning.

The victims of the election attacks in Maiduguri were primarily party
leaders, government officials and voters:

• An All Nigeria Peoples Party (ANPP) gubernatorial candidate was
assassinated on January 28 (newsonnigeria.com, January 29). 

• The police chief of Borno State and an undercover policeman were
assassinated in their homes during the week of February 20 (AFP, February
24).

• Imam Ibrahim Ahmed Abdullahi, an Islamic scholar and preacher against
sectarian violence, was assassinated outside his mosque on March 13
(news24.com [Lagos], March 14).

• The Chairman of the ANPP was assassinated on March 28 after a party
meeting (Daily Trust [Ikeja, Lagos State], March 28).

• At least ten people were injured in a bomb blast at the Unguwar Doki
polling center and six casualties incurred at the Independent National
Electoral Coalition polling center on April 9 (Vanguard [Lagos], April 9;
Daily Trust, April 11).

• On March 29, police uncovered a Boko Haram plot to bomb an ANPP election
rally in Maiduguri, but that same day Boko Haram militants killed three
civilians in an attack spoiling the rally anyway (Reuters, March 30).

Boko Haram did not claim responsibility for each of the attacks, but the
methods – such as motorcycle and SUV drive-by shootings – and the victims
targeted for assassination bear the mark of Boko Haram (AP, February 24). In
flyers written in Hausa and Arabic that Boko Haram sent to news
organizations in Borno State on April 24, the group said: "We do not believe
in any system of government, be it traditional or orthodox. That is why we
are fighting against democracy, capitalism, socialism and the rest… We do
not respect the Nigerian government because it is illegal… We will continue
to fight its military and police because they are not protecting Islam..."
(Saferafricagroup.com, April 25; BBC, April 25).

However, Boko Haram's attacks were not the lone factor in sparking the
post-election violence between Muslims and Christians that left more than
500 people dead and 75,000 people displaced. In fact, Boko Haram's attacks
did not cause a delay or shutdown in any of the polls and Maiduguri was
spared from most of the post-election violence. Thus, there is no clear
correlation between the frequency of Boko Haram terrorist activity and the
degree of post-election sectarian violence (AP, April 24).

Political and economic forces beyond Boko Haram's control fueled the flames
of sectarian strife. Allegations of vote-rigging, the economic
marginalization of the northern Muslim majority relative to the more
prosperous Christian-majority south and the 57% of the presidential vote for
Goodluck Jonathan (a Christian from the south) compared to the 31% for
Muhammad Buhari (a Muslim from the north) brought disaffected Muslims into
the streets, but then the protests took on religious rather than political
or economic overtones.

Regardless of the factors behind the violence, Boko Haram may have set an
example for some of the worst acts of religious-inspired terrorism during
the rioting. On Christmas Eve in 2010, Boko Haram members attacked and
burned down two churches in Maiduguri and bombed a church in Jos, killing 80
people (al-Jazeera, December 31, 2010). In April's post-election violence,
Muslim rioters burned down as many as 40 churches.

As one of Boko Haram's main goals is to destroy the Nigerian state and
impose Shari'a in the entire country, Boko Haram has much to gain from the
religious fighting. Muslim dissatisfaction with the Christian leadership in
Nigeria and feelings of inequality strengthen Boko Haram's argument for
replacing what is perceived to be an ineffective secular political system
with an Islamic system and for replacing Western education with Islamic
education – the original purpose for Boko Haram's existence (Boko Haram
means "Western Education is Sacrilege" in Hausa). The religious fighting
spreads the Nigerian security forces thin as personnel seek to manage the
riots while also countering Boko Haram and other rebellious groups in the
southern Niger Delta and elsewhere.

If these tensions continue to resurface year after year as they have in
2009, 2010 and now 2011, Boko Haram may then be able to brand itself as the
champion of the Muslims by making headlines and gaining notoriety from
highly-publicized attacks, even if most Muslims in northern Nigeria do not
support to its radical interpretation of Islam and use of violence to
achieve political objectives. The Nigerian government must evaluate the
roots of the religious divide and find solutions to reduce conflict between
Muslims and Christians, which would then undermine Boko Haram's raison
d'être and counter its recruiting propaganda. Despite capturing and killing
the Boko Haram leader, Muhammad Yusuf, in 2009 and conducting several
crackdowns killing hundreds of sect members, Boko Haram has replenished its
ranks by attracting radicalized Muslims, making the group is as active as
ever right now.

Thus far, existing Muslim-Christian tensions in Nigeria have had a
destabilizing effect on the Nigerian state far outweighing Boko Haram's tens
of terrorist attacks. While these sectarian tensions simmer, all Boko Haram
needs to do is to continue fuelling the fire with terror attacks against
state institutions, government officials, and churches until the group
becomes closer to achieving one of its more insidious objectives – launching
Nigeria into a "full-scale war" (Daily Champion [Lagos], February 3). 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, 
[email protected].
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[email protected]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: [email protected]
  Subscribe:    [email protected]
  Unsubscribe:  [email protected]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtmlYahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to