http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/publications/id.9501/pub_detail.asp

 

May 13, 2011


Muammar Gets some Nice Alligator Shoes


 <http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/authors/id.149/author_detail.asp>
Robert Weissberg


Print This <javascript:%20printVersion()>  E-mail This
<javascript:%20emailVersion()>  



 <javascript:void(0);> http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/images/share.png


ShareThis <javascript:void(0);> 

 

Comments (0)
<http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/publications/comments.asp?id=9501> 

http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/imgLib/20110512_SpartacusCrucifixion.jp
g

 

After thinking it over for a day or so, President Obama decided against
publicly releasing the pictures of a blood-soaked dead Bin Laden. The
President compared releasing these photographs to excessively celebrating a
touchdown (“spiking the ball”) and added that such gore would only inflame
the “Arab Street” and make the U.S. even more unpopular. He also assured
Muslims that bin Laden’s corpse was treated with respect and in accordance
with Islamic law. 

 

This is the wrong approach for it projects an image of weakness to a culture
that worships strength. Foreign policy is not about gaining a few points in
the latest Pew Middle East survey. What Obama (and his weak stomach
advisors) fails to realize is that gruesomely punishing one’s enemy offers
an all-too-rare teachable moment regarding what happens to bad guys who mess
with Uncle Sam. This opportunity is especially valuable where literacy is
rare or, as in the Middle East, the conspiracy-minded often refused to
accept reality. We certainly do not need Elvis-lives-like reports of Bin
Laden being “sighted” in some Iranian village. Sanitizing killing may be
fine for hiding how beef and pork arrive at the dinner table but it’s the
wrong strategy for defeating radical Islam.

 

The subdued, almost apologetic approach contravenes human history. When the
Romans crushed a slave rebellion, rebels were crucified and the crosses
lined the main highway to Rome. Few slaves would miss the point. When the
Ottoman Sultan executed Treasury officials for corruption, their heads were
impaled on long poles and displayed for all to see. Public beheadings and
hangings were the day’s rock concerts in eighteen century Europe. Even in
the early kind and gentle American colonies, the stock and whipping post
(and occasional hangings) were public. The clincher is this “make it public”
argument is that Sharia punishment is always public—stoning adulterers to
death always attracts a crowd. In this sense, public gore and guts is
consistent with Muslim culture.

 

America’s military heroes were once openly feted and this custom remains
worthy. President Obama should have requested a Broadway ticker tape parade
honoring the SEALS and supporting staff complete with world-wide TV coverage
and Mayor Bloomberg handing out keys to the city. Declare a school holiday,
too. Just to make sure there was no ambiguity, souvenir venders (no doubt,
many of whom would likely be business-savvy Moslems) would hawk American
flags and sticks with Osama bin Laden’s severed bearded, turbaned head on
top.  Add a few tee-shirts with graphic and slightly obscene messages. Yes,
there were spontaneous outpourings of patriotic celebration (and a few bin
Laden jokes on the internet) but these outpourings were unofficial and this
makes all the difference in the world. 

  

President Obama’s strident effort to minimize offending Muslim sensibilities
is part of a much larger ill-advised policy. He honestly seems to believe
that U.S. foreign policy is a popularity contest. Recall his June 4, 2009
speech in
<http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/remarks-president-cairo-universi
ty-6-04-09> Cairo where he shamelessly pandered to the Muslim crowd by
misrepresenting the Muslim role in American society (including sports) and
grossly exaggerated Islam’s contribution to civilization. He even promised
to spend billions on schools and hospitals in Afghanistan and Pakistan in
his effort to befriend listeners. This “I’m sorry about America and I’ll try
to do better” mentality is what gained him the Nobel Peace Prize.

 

Much has been made of President Obama’s intellectual roots, his association
with Bill Ayers and the writings of Saul Alinsky, but one sage he obviously
avoided is Niccolò Machiavelli (1469-1527). It was Machiavelli who said, “It
is much more secure to be feared than to be loved” and this advice still
remains true. I would guess that the President’s reputation as a “softie”
helps explain why the Pakistan government felt comfortable about sheltering
bin Laden. Moreover, the Pakistani shock was not from the actual
sovereignty-violating raid itself, but its authorization by a political
leader famous for pandering. Can you imagine a similar surprise reaction if
Ronald “the cowboy” Reagan were president? 

 

The great irony of gaining a reputation for violent toughness, particularly
in the Arab world, is that it makes actual recourse to violence less likely.
Weakness invites trouble. This is not rocket science—not even the most
mentally challenged stick-up artist would rob a store with well-known Mafia
ties. Rather than running around giving nice speeches about “US-Muslim
friendship,” a better message is to endlessly stress that we are not afraid
of you burning our flag, shouting “death to America” and all the rest for
the umpteenth time. Make sure that everybody grasps that Uncle Sam will not
be intimidated by an angry but militarily impotent mob. In Mafia language,
Uncle Sam is to be “respected.” 

 

Lessons reside here for choosing our next president. Waging a shooting war
is hugely expensive, risks alienating public opinion, and in today’s world
seldom conclusive. Far more efficient is to impose our will by intimidation,
and this requires credibility and the best way to establish credibility is
an occasional gruesome execution. 

 

In this New World Order anybody who speaks of possibly winning a Nobel Peace
Prize for having the UN solve America’s problems will have their citizenship
revoked to automatically disqualify them for the presidency. Any candidate
who uses the terms “outreach” and “dialogue” will immediately be dispatched
to New Guinea to resolve territorial disputes among head hunters. 

 

My personal approach is to close my eyes and imagine each candidate
play-acting Dirty Harry, asking some local tyrant if this is his lucky day.
Just let the despot know he will be killed, not some wimpy “brought to
justice,” and his mutilated body put on display before being fed to
alligators. Then kill the alligators and use their skins for designer shoes,
belts and handbags. These will then be given as gifts to the wives and
girlfriends of world leaders who contemplate messing with Uncle Sam. Just
imagine Qaddafi’s face when the FedEx box arrives with nice alligator shoes
for him, all his wives and children, with a little gift note saying,
“Thinking of you”? No doubt, he would scream, “These shoes are made for
walking…let’s go.”   

 

 <http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/> FamilySecurityMatters.org
Contributing Editor Robert Weissberg is emeritus professor of political
science, University of Illinois-Urbana and currently an adjunct instructor
at New York University Department of Politics (graduate). He has written
many books, the most recent being: The Limits of Civic Activism, Pernicious
Tolerance: How teaching to "accept differences" undermines civil society and
<http://badstudentsnotbadschools.com/> Bad Students, Not Bad Schools.
Besides writing for professional journals, he has also written for magazines
like the Weekly Standard and currently contributes to various blogs.

 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, 
[email protected].
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[email protected]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: [email protected]
  Subscribe:    [email protected]
  Unsubscribe:  [email protected]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtmlYahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to