http://www.foxnews.com/world/2010/07/12/data-shows-pakistan-googling-pornogr
aphic-material/


No. 1 Nation in Sexy Web Searches? Call it Pornistan


By Kelli Morgan <http://www.foxnews.com/author/kelli-morgan/index.html>  

Published July 13, 2010

| FoxNews.com

 Pakistan has banned content on more than a dozen websites because of
offensive and blasphemous material. The Muslim country, which has laws on
dress codes, ranks as the top country to proportionally search for certain
sex-related terms.
<http://a57.foxnews.com/static/managed/img/396/223/Pakistan%20Website.jpg> 

AP

Pakistan has banned content on more than a dozen websites because of
offensive and blasphemous material. The Muslim country, which has laws on
dress codes, ranks as the top country to proportionally search for certain
sex-related terms.

This article was updated on July 14.

They may call it the "Land of the Pure," but Pakistan turns out to be
anything but.

The Muslim country, which has banned content on at least 17 websites to
block offensive and blasphemous material, is the world's leader in online
searches for pornographic material, FoxNews.com has learned.

"You won't find strip clubs in Islamic countries. Most Islamic countries
have certain dress codes," said Gabriel Said Reynolds, professor of Islamic
Studies at the University of Notre Dame. "It would be an irony if they
haven't shown the same vigilance to pornography."

So here's the irony: Google ranks Pakistan No. 1 in the world in searches
for pornographic terms, outranking every other country in the world in
searches per person for certain sex-related content.

Pakistan is top dog in searches per-person for "horse sex" since 2004,
"donkey sex" since 2007, "rape pictures" between 2004 and 2009, "rape sex"
since 2004, "child sex" between 2004 and 2007 and since 2009, "animal sex"
since 2004 and "dog sex" since 2005, according to Google Trends and Google
Insights, features of Google that generate data based on popular search
terms.

The country also is tops -- or has been No. 1 -- in searches for "sex,"
"camel sex," "rape video," "child sex video" and some other searches that
can't be printed here.

Google Trends generates data of popular search terms in geographic locations
during specific time frames. Google Insights is a more advanced version that
allows users to filter a search to geographic locations, time frames and the
nature of a search, including web, images, products and news.

Pakistan ranked No. 1 in all the searches listed above on Google Trends, but
on only some of them in Google Insights.

"We do our best to provide accurate data and to provide insights into broad
search patterns, but the results for a given query may contain inaccuracies
due to data sampling issues, approximations, or incomplete data for the
terms entered," Google said in a statement, when asked about the accuracy of
its reports. 

The Embassy of Islamic Republic of Pakistan did not reply to a request for
an interview.

In addition to banning content on 17 websites, including
islamexposed.blogspot.com, Pakistan is monitoring seven other sites --
Google, Yahoo, Bing, YouTube, Amazon, MSN and Hotmail -- for anti-Islamic
content, the Associated Press reported in June.

But it's not to censor the Pakistani people, Reynolds said. It's to shut out
the rest of the world.

"[It] could lead to conversion, which would undermine the very order of the
state," he said. "Part of protecting the society is making sure that there
is no way it could be undermined in terms of foreign influences."

Pakistan temporarily banned Facebook in May when Muslim groups protested the
"Everybody Draw Muhammad Day" page, where users were encouraged to upload
pictures of the Prophet Muhammad. The page remained on Facebook, but
Pakistani users were unable to view it, said Andrew Noyes, manager of
Facebook's Public Policy Communication.

And while Pakistan is taking measures to prevent blasphemous material from
being viewed by its citizens, pornographic material is "certainly"
contradictory to Islam, too, Reynolds said.

The country's punishment for those charged with blasphemy is execution, but
the question remains what -- if anything -- can be done about people who
search for porn on the Web.

"It's a new phenomenon," Reynolds said.

 





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, 
[email protected].
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[email protected]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: [email protected]
  Subscribe:    [email protected]
  Unsubscribe:  [email protected]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtmlYahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to