Well, that eliminates Gingrich from the GOP nomination.

 

B

 

http://www.newsmax.com/Headline/gingrich-health-care-insurance/2011/05/15/id
/396426?s=al
<http://www.newsmax.com/Headline/gingrich-health-care-insurance/2011/05/15/i
d/396426?s=al&promo_code=C446-1> &promo_code=C446-1

 


Gingrich Backs Obamacare's Individual Mandate Requiring Health Insurance


Sunday, 15 May 2011 07:18 PM

Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich said Sunday that he strongly supports a
federal mandate requiring citizens to buy health insurance - a position that
has been rejected by many Republicans, including several who likely will be
running against him for the Republican presidential nomination.

Appearing on NBC's "Meet the Press," Gingrich told host David Gregory that
he continues to advocate for a plan he first called for in the early 1990s
as a Congressman, which requires every uninsured citizen to purchase or
acquire health insurance.

Gregory played a clip of Gingrich speaking during an appearance on Meet the
Press in October 1993:

"I am for people, individuals -- exactly like automobile insurance --
individuals having health insurance and being required to have health
insurance. And I am prepared to vote for a voucher system which will give
individuals, on a sliding scale, a government subsidy so we insure that
everyone as individuals have health insurance."

Gregory asked Gingrich if he would criticize GOP presidential rival Mitt
Romney, whose "Romneycare" health program enacted during his time as
Governor in Massachusetts mandated that all uninsured purchase health
insurance.

Gingrich replied he would not make it an issue in the campaign and said he
agreed with key aspects of Romneycare.

"I agree that all of us have a responsibility to pay--help pay for health
care," Gingrich said, adding, "I've said consistently we ought to have some
requirement that you either have health insurance or you post a bond ..."

Gingrich also admitted that his proposal is a "variation" of the individual
mandate, a key component of the Obamacare legislation President Obama signed
into law in 2010.

The position staked out by Gingrich appears to be at odds with leading
conservative critics of Obamacare, who argue that the law requiring citizens
to purchase a private insurance policy is not constitutional.

The Obama administration is currently facing three lawsuits arguing that the
federal mandate is unconstitutional, including one filed by a coalition of
26 states. 

The issue is on track for a Supreme Court decision in the summer of 2012,
which would make it a likely hot-button topic heading into the elections.

Conservative GOP critics like Virginia Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli say
the mandate is unconstitutional because although Congress can regulate
commerce, it can't require people to engage in a particular "economic
activity" just because they live in the U.S.

Conservative judicial experts have also taken exception to the claim made by
Gingrich and supporters of the Obamacare law that mandating health insurance
is the same as the government requirement to purchase car insurance, noting
that driving a car is a privilege provided by states and not a
constitutional right.

Cucinelli says that "buying auto insurance is voluntary, since you are only
required to purchase it if you choose to drive on public roads. But buying
health insurance under the new federal law is not voluntary, as you are
required to buy it just by virtue of the fact that you are breathing. The
federal government has never before in history exercised its regulatory
power to require someone to buy a product or service as a condition of
residence in the United States."

Gingrich, though, seemed to disagree with that notion on Sunday, though he
was quick to point out the differences between his plan and the federal
health law.

"In, in the first place, Obama basically is trying to replace the entire
insurance system, creating state exchanges, building a Washington-based
model, creating a federal system," Gingrich told NBC's David Gregory. "I
believe all of us--and this is going to be a big debate--I believe all of us
have a responsibility to help pay for healthcare ."

Romney has not come under fire for not disowning his health care plan, which
has caused private health care insurance rates to skyrocket as patient
services have declined in Massachusetts.

Gingrich's position quickly came under fire from several conservative blogs
on Sunday. 

"He tried to distinguish his mandate from the Obama mandate, but with little
success," the American Federalist Journal wrote on Sunday. 

"Sandbagging your fellow Republicans in Congress and offering tacit support
for a key (unconstitutional) component of Obamacare is a very strange way to
begin a run in a Republican primary. Not a strong start."

The Wall Street Journal called Gingrich's description of an ideal healthcare
plan with mandates a "pretty good description of what the Democratic
Congress passed into law last year."

The Journal continued: "Beginning in 2014, most Americans who don't have
insurance will be required to pay a fee, with many, depending on income,
getting subsidies to help buy coverage through state-based exchanges."

The conservative website Red State said Gingrich "won't exactly endear him
to the Tea Party crowd or the reform minded movement sweeping the GOP.

 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, 
[email protected].
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[email protected]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: [email protected]
  Subscribe:    [email protected]
  Unsubscribe:  [email protected]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtmlYahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to