GAFFNEY: Obama’s next war

President’s ill-considered Islamist backing puts Israel in the cross hairs

3 Comments and 5 Reactions 
<http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2011/may/23/obamas-next-war/#disqus_thread>
 |Tweet|Share 
<http://www.addthis.com/bookmark.php?v=250&winname=addthis&pub=washtimes&source=tbx-250&lng=en-us&s=facebook&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.washingtontimes.com%2Fnews%2F2011%2Fmay%2F23%2Fobamas-next-war%2Fprint%2F&title=GAFFNEY%3A%20Obama's%20next%20war%20-%20Washington%20Times&ate=AT-washtimes/-/-/4ddd0d25fa5250e8/1&uid=4ddd0d2585bbef98&sms_ss=1&at_xt=1&pre=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.washingtontimes.com%2Fnews%2F2011%2Fmay%2F23%2Fobamas-next-war%2F&tt=0>
 |Print 
<http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2011/may/23/obamas-next-war/print/> 
|Email|More <http://www.addthis.com/bookmark.php?v=250&pubid=washtimes>     

By Frank J. Gaffney Jr. 

-

The Washington Times

6:11 p.m., Monday, May 23, 2011

clip_image001Illustration: Obama’s war by Greg Groesch for The Washington Times

Bottom of Form

Barack Obama's tenure as commander in chief has not exactly been characterized 
by success. What comes next, however, may make his record to date look like the 
good old days.

To be sure, on his watch, an extraordinary intelligence-special operations 
forces team liquidated Osama bin Laden and drones have dispatched a number of 
other "high-value targets" in what the president calls our "war on al Qaeda." 
These are morale-boosting tactical achievements, but in the great scheme of 
things, they are more like Whac-a-Mole than strategic victories. Much more 
important is the fact that Mr. Obama is in the process of losing the two wars 
he inherited and making a hash of the one he initiated in Libya.

Worse, Mr. Obama is actively encouraging trends that threaten to unleash the 
next horrific regional war in the Middle East - a war that may well embroil 
nations far beyond, including ours.

The president's mishandling of the present conflicts has set the stage for such 
dangers.

c Mr. Obama's earlier insistence on withdrawing U.S. combat forces from Iraq 
and his abiding determination to pull out virtually all others by year's end 
has, as a practical matter, made it impossible for the government in Baghdad to 
ask us to stay. Even if the Iranian puppet, Muqtada al-Sadr, were not 
threatening - if Americans are invited to stay - to relaunch his Mahdi Army's 
sectarian warfare and bring down the coalition government (in which his party 
is a prominent part) the Iraqis can hardly be more in favor of maintaining an 
American presence than we are.

The predictable result in Iraq next year (if not before) will be a vacuum of 
power that Iran surely will fill. State Department officials and other 
Americans left behind in the hope that the immense investment we have made in 
lives and treasure in Iraq's democratic and pro-Western future will not be 
squandered stand to become endangered species. The ironic symbol of our defeat 
may be the takeover in due course of the immense new U.S. embassy in Baghdad by 
Iranians - this time by invited diplomats, not the hostage-taking "students" of 
1979.

c Afghanistan - no longer George W. Bush's war, but Barack Obama's - is, if 
anything, in even worse shape. There, despite the valor of our troops and 
others trying to build a 21st-century nation out of a backward sixth-century 
tribal/Islamist entity, we are in the process of negotiating the Afghans' 
surrender to the Taliban. Again, the president's insistence that U.S. forces 
will begin coming out of theater this summer signals to friends and foes alike 
that we will not stay the course. The only question now is: How ignominious 
will be our defeat at the hands of those we routed after Sept. 11 and their 
Pakistani, Chinese, Iranian and Russian friends?

c Then there is Mr. Obama's first "elective war": His ill-considered, 
incoherent, congressionally unauthorized and, to date at least, unsuccessful 
campaign in Libya. Mr. Obama has tried to limit the costs and offload 
responsibility for this fiasco onto the French, British and other NATO allies. 
Once again U.S. forces have performed their missions impressively - but to what 
end? We are now aligned with, defending and increasingly supporting "rebels" 
who, if anything, are likely to be more dangerous enemies of the United States 
than Moammar Gadhafi.

Which brings us to Mr. Obama's next war. In his speech last week to what he 
calls "the Muslim world," the president made it U.S. policy to support whoever 
manages to get elected in the various nations of North Africa and the Middle 
East currently undergoing political upheavals. As a practical matter, that will 
mean legitimating, working with and underwriting the Muslim Brotherhood because 
it is far and away the most organized, disciplined and ruthless of the 
contenders for power in country after country. History tells us that such 
organizations and people - from Hitler in Weimar Germany to Hamas in the Gaza 
Strip - win even "free and fair" elections, which then amount to one-man, 
one-vote, one-time.

President Obama's openness (to put it mildly) to bringing the Brotherhood to 
power was manifested not only by his pledge to forgive $1 billion in Egyptian 
debt and to provide Egypt another billion in additional foreign aid. Just as he 
did in his last much-ballyhooed "outreach" to Muslims in Cairo two years ago, 
Mr. Obama had one of the top Muslim Brothers - Imam Mohamed Magid, president of 
the Muslim Brotherhood's largest front group in this country, the Islamic 
Society of North America - prominently seated in the audience at the State 
Department.

Beyond his embrace of the ascendant Muslim Brotherhood, Mr. Obama has helped 
catalyze the next Middle East war by declaring that Israel must return to the 
1967 borders, whose indefensibility induced the Arab nations to precipitate the 
Six-Day War of that year. However much the president may deny it and point to 
others as supporting a "two-state solution" based on such borders, the Jewish 
state cannot survive without the high ground, strategic depth and aquifers of 
the Golan Heights and West Bank. Period.

It is in America's vital interests to deter more wars in the Middle East, not 
invite them. If Mr. Obama persists in the latter, his already checkered record 
as commander in chief may make him best remembered as the man who elected to 
precipitate World War III.

Frank J. Gaffney Jr. is president of the Center for Security Policy 
(SecureFreedom.org), a columnist for The Washington Times and host of "Secure 
Freedom Radio," heard in Washington weeknights at 9 on WRC-AM (1260).

© Copyright 2011 The Washington Times, LLC

 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, 
[email protected].
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[email protected]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: [email protected]
  Subscribe:    [email protected]
  Unsubscribe:  [email protected]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtmlYahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to