Times Touts 'Rich History,' Surging Online Presence of the Communist Party
USA


Conservatives may have it rough in the pages of the New York Times, but U.S.
Communists can count on favorable, critic-free publicity, with reporters
even employing Communist lingo like "the proletariat." 

 

The latest: Joseph Berger's Monday metro story, " Workers of the World,
Please See Our Web Site." The original online headline was less cheeky but
more ideologically slanted: "Leftist Parties in New York Have New Appeal."

Berger's profile of three Manhattan-based hard-left parties has a light,
hopeful tone similar to Channing Joseph's notorious November 7, 2010
photo-story in the Times, " Where Marxists Pontificate, And Play ," in which
the worst thing he found to say about the Manhattan gathering of supporters
of murderous regimes was their reputation for "seriousness." 

Like Joseph before him, Berger posed no awkward questions about the
atrocities of Communist heroes Stalin, Mao, or Castro. He wrote:

You can still be a card-carrying Communist in New York, but these days
committed Communists usually register online.

"We actually have a card, but we don't make a big deal of it," said Sam
Webb, the national chairman of the Communist Party U.S.A.

....

In some ways, the Left remains locked in place. Its three major national
parties are still confined to cramped Manhattan offices that are plastered
with gaudy posters and honeycombed with pamphlets for distribution and
envelopes for stuffing.

But in other ways the landscape has changed significantly. All three parties
are finding the Internet to be a fruitful recruiting tool and believe their
message has been given a fresh, beguiling appeal by the failures of
capitalist symbols like Lehman Brothers and by debacles like the billions of
dollars in securities tied to subprime mortgages.

"The economic crisis of 2008 gave us new life," said Billy Wharton, a
co-chairman of the Socialist Party, who grew enamored of socialism while
battling tuition increases as a student at the College of Staten Island.
"We have ideas for resolving the economic crisis, and people began to listen
to them."

Rather than trumpeting membership numbers, the parties, embracing the norms
of the digital era, prefer to discuss the number of hits on their Web sites
and Facebook pages.    And philosophically, they take a kind of
I-told-you-so schadenfreude in statistics that indicate a growing gap
between the rich and the poor, with top chief executives now making 275
times as much as the average proletarian.

On the plus side, one doesn't often see admissions that actual Socialist
organizations participate in union rallies (the Times typically fails to
apply any kind of ideological labels to left-wing marches and protests):

Rather than battling for power through elections, all three parties try to
sway the national conversation through coalitions with labor unions and
other mainstream organizations. Both socialist groups turned out at City
Hall this month to protest budget cuts, at a rally that was largely
organized by the unions.

Berger repeated the Communist talking points, and his one tut-tutting moment
was extremely mild:

Recent disclosures of capitalist excesses have given the parties a second
wind after the collapse of the Soviet Union suggested the bankruptcy of
collectivist philosophy. Mr. Llewellyn said that since 2007 his party's
membership had increased by 50 percent, to 6,000.

....

Mr. Webb, who joined the Communists in the 1970s, likes to emphasize the
party's rich history, including the fight against McCarthyism and the
volunteers who helped the Spanish Republicans battle the Fascists, rather
than more unpleasant episodes like the case of the American Communist Julius
Rosenberg, who spied for the Soviet Union.

Even taking into account that this is the U.S. Communist party, the U.S.
groups took their orders from Moscow, making the U.S. party complicit in
Stalinist atrocities.

  <http://www.timeswatch.org> www.timeswatch.org 

 





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, 
[email protected].
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[email protected]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: [email protected]
  Subscribe:    [email protected]
  Unsubscribe:  [email protected]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtmlYahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to