> 2) In the definition of AutomationResult, I suggest we add some > additional wording to the description of oslc_auto:initialParameter > to indicate that this is an exact copy of the parameters specified > in the AutomationRequest.
Given that read-only is unspecified in some cases, I'd want to call it a point-in-time copy (or snapshot) rather than risk implying implementations using in-line representations must do extra work to keep distributed copies of "the same thing" in synch. Best Regards, John Voice US 845-435-9470 BluePages Tivoli OSLC Lead - Show me the Scenario
