oslc-automation  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [Oslc-Automation] dcterms:creator for Automation Result Paul McMahan
• [Oslc-Automation] ACTION REQUIRED: New OSLC members agreement and workgroup particpant agreements Michael F Fiedler
• [Oslc-Automation] Automation vocabulary document rife with rdfs:range predicates John Arwe
• [Oslc-Automation] state property for requests Joe Ross
  • Re: [Oslc-Automation] state property for requests Michael F Fiedler
  • Re: [Oslc-Automation] state property for requests John Arwe
• [Oslc-Automation] synchronous requests/results Joe Ross
  • Re: [Oslc-Automation] synchronous requests/results Michael F Fiedler
  • Re: [Oslc-Automation] synchronous requests/results John Arwe
• [Oslc-Automation] outputParameter vs. hasContribution in response Joe Ross
  • Re: [Oslc-Automation] outputParameter vs. hasContribution in response Michael F Fiedler
• [Oslc-Automation] support for oslc.properties Joe Ross
  • Re: [Oslc-Automation] support for oslc.properties Michael F Fiedler
• [Oslc-Automation] Reminder: OSLC Automation workgroup meeting tomorrow (23 August) at 10:00AM Eastern US Michael F Fiedler
• [Oslc-Automation] AUTO: Paul Meharg is out of the office. (returning 08/27/2012) Paul Meharg
• [Oslc-Automation] Adoption issues with inputParameter and outputParameter Pramod K Chandoria
  • Re: [Oslc-Automation] Adoption issues with inputParameter and outputParameter Michael F Fiedler
  • Re: [Oslc-Automation] Adoption issues with inputParameter and outputParameter Michael F Fiedler
  • Re: [Oslc-Automation] Adoption issues with inputParameter and outputParameter John Arwe
• [Oslc-Automation] Recent Automation specification updates for review Michael F Fiedler
• [Oslc-Automation] OSLC Automation workgroup meeting CANCELED this week (16 August) Michael F Fiedler
• [Oslc-Automation] Preparing OSLC Automation specification for finalization Michael F Fiedler
  • Re: [Oslc-Automation] Preparing OSLC Automation specification for finalization Pramod K Chandoria
  • Re: [Oslc-Automation] Preparing OSLC Automation specification for finalization Michael F Fiedler
• [Oslc-Automation] Name of oslc_auto:outputParameter in Automation Result Michael F Fiedler
• [Oslc-Automation] AUTO: is out of the office. (returning 15/08/2012) Willie Duchenay
• [Oslc-Automation] Automation specification updates + request for outputParameter name suggestions Michael F Fiedler
  • Re: [Oslc-Automation] Automation specification updates + request for outputParameter name suggestions Charles Rankin
  • Re: [Oslc-Automation] Automation specification updates + request for outputParameter name suggestions Michael F Fiedler
• [Oslc-Automation] Automation workgroup meeting tomorrow (9 August) at 10AM Eastern - Call for attendance as we close remaining spec issues Michael F Fiedler
• [Oslc-Automation] Reminder: OSLC Automation workgroup meeting tomrorrow (2 August) at 1PM Eastern US Michael F Fiedler
• [Oslc-Automation] July 26 meeting is CANCELED John Arwe
• [Oslc-Automation] Core accepted the addition of oslc:usage to oslc:Service John Arwe
• Re: [Oslc-Automation] Oslc-Automation Digest, Vol 17, Issue 21 Daniel Berg
  • Re: [Oslc-Automation] Oslc-Automation Digest, Vol 17, Issue 21 Pramod K Chandoria
  • Re: [Oslc-Automation] Oslc-Automation Digest, Vol 17, Issue 21 David N Brauneis
  • Re: [Oslc-Automation] Oslc-Automation Digest, Vol 17, Issue 21 Pramod K Chandoria
  • [Oslc-Automation] oslc_auto:state property for AutomationRequest - Should this be read only? Pramod K Chandoria
  • Re: [Oslc-Automation] oslc_auto:state property for AutomationRequest - Should this be read only? John Arwe
  • Re: [Oslc-Automation] oslc_auto:state property for AutomationRequest - Should this be read only? David N Brauneis
  • Re: [Oslc-Automation] Oslc-Automation Digest, Vol 17, Issue 21 Charles Rankin
  • Re: [Oslc-Automation] Oslc-Automation Digest, Vol 17, Issue 21 Charles Rankin
  • Re: [Oslc-Automation] Oslc-Automation Digest, Vol 17, Issue 21 Daniel Berg
• [Oslc-Automation] Revisiting input and output parameters Charles Rankin
  • Re: [Oslc-Automation] Revisiting input and output parameters Max Vohlken
  • Re: [Oslc-Automation] Revisiting input and output parameters Pramod K Chandoria
• [Oslc-Automation] July 26 meeting John Arwe
• Re: [Oslc-Automation] Oslc-Automation Digest, Vol 17, Issue 17 Daniel Berg
  • Re: [Oslc-Automation] Oslc-Automation Digest, Vol 17, Issue 17 John Arwe
• [Oslc-Automation] Today's meeting minutes available John Arwe
• [Oslc-Automation] type issue John Arwe
  • Re: [Oslc-Automation] type issue Paul McMahan
• [Oslc-Automation] AUTO: Paul Meharg is out of the office. (returning 07/20/2012) Paul Meharg
• [Oslc-Automation] we missed some updates when removing "interaction styles" from the draft John Arwe
• [Oslc-Automation] OSLC Automation workgroup: type issue + info for this week's meeting Michael F Fiedler
• [Oslc-Automation] Reminder: OSLC Automation workgroup meeting tomorrow (12 July) at 10 AM Eastern US Michael F Fiedler
• [Oslc-Automation] AUTO: Paul Meharg is out of the office. (returning 07/16/2012) Paul Meharg
• [Oslc-Automation] Guidance on oslc:domain usage Fw: Implementation issues when Automation type is not known Michael F Fiedler
  • Re: [Oslc-Automation] [oslc-core] Guidance on oslc:domain usage Fw: Implementation issues when Automation type is not known Arthur Ryman
  • Re: [Oslc-Automation] Guidance on oslc:domain usage Fw: Implementation issues when Automation type is not known Steve K Speicher
  • Re: [Oslc-Automation] [oslc-core] Guidance on oslc:domain usage Fw: Implementation issues when Automation type is not known John Arwe
• [Oslc-Automation] Today's workgroup meeting cancelled - next meeting 12 July at 10AM Eastern US Michael F Fiedler
• [Oslc-Automation] AUTO: Min Li is out of the office (returning 07/06/2012) Min Li
• [Oslc-Automation] Implementation issues when Automation type is not known Jing Qian
  • Re: [Oslc-Automation] Implementation issues when Automation type is not known David N Brauneis
  • [no subject] Xin Peng Liu
  • Re: [Oslc-Automation] Implementation issues when Automation type is not known Charles Rankin
  • [no subject] Xin Peng Liu
  • Re: [Oslc-Automation] Implementation issues when Automation type is not known Jing Qian
  • [Oslc-Automation] Point of email etiquette John Arwe
  • Re: [Oslc-Automation] Implementation issues when Automation type is not known Jing Qian
  • Re: [Oslc-Automation] Implementation issues when Automation type is not known David N Brauneis
  • Re: [Oslc-Automation] Implementation issues when Automation type is not known Paul McMahan
  • Re: [Oslc-Automation] Implementation issues when Automation type is not known Pramod K Chandoria
• Re: [Oslc-Automation] Oslc-Automation Digest, Vol 16, Issue 12 Daniel Berg
  • Re: [Oslc-Automation] Oslc-Automation Digest, Vol 16, Issue 12 David N Brauneis
  • Re: [Oslc-Automation] Oslc-Automation Digest, Vol 16, Issue 12 Pramod K Chandoria
  • Re: [Oslc-Automation] Oslc-Automation Digest, Vol 16, Issue 12 David N Brauneis
  • Re: [Oslc-Automation] Oslc-Automation Digest, Vol 16, Issue 12 Charles Rankin
  • Re: [Oslc-Automation] Oslc-Automation Digest, Vol 16, Issue 12 Daniel Berg
• [Oslc-Automation] Reminder: OSLC Automation workgroup meeting tomorrow (28 June) at 10AM Eastern US Michael F Fiedler
• [Oslc-Automation] Automation state and verdict issues Michael F Fiedler
• [Oslc-Automation] Reminder: OSLC Automation workgroup meeting tomorrow (21 June) at 1PM Eastern US time Michael F Fiedler
• [Oslc-Automation] Automation spec updated based on synchronous/asynchronous discussion - plus 1 issue Michael F Fiedler
  • Re: [Oslc-Automation] Automation spec updated based on synchronous/asynchronous discussion - plus 1 issue John Arwe
• [Oslc-Automation] Reminder: OSLC Automation workgroup meeting tomorrow (14 May) at 10:00 AM Eastern US time Michael F Fiedler
• [Oslc-Automation] Emily Littella time - previous slug of emails were intended for Performance Monitoring WG not Automation John Arwe
• [Oslc-Automation] PmScenarioCoverageReport scenario questions John Arwe
• [Oslc-Automation] PmAppMonitProgrammatic scenario questions John Arwe
• [Oslc-Automation] PmAppMonitAdmin scenario questions John Arwe
• [Oslc-Automation] PmAppMonitoring scenario questions John Arwe
• [Oslc-Automation] strawman + questions for resource definitions John Arwe
• [Oslc-Automation] open questions from 21-May email John Arwe
• [Oslc-Automation] AUTO: Paul Meharg is out of the office. (returning 06/08/2012) Paul Meharg
• [Oslc-Automation] AUTO: is out of the office. (returning 05/06/2012) Willie Duchenay
• [Oslc-Automation] Consider pub/sub for asynchronized automation request Xin Peng Liu
  • Re: [Oslc-Automation] Consider pub/sub for asynchronized automation request Charles Rankin
  • Re: [Oslc-Automation] Consider pub/sub for asynchronized automation request Xin Peng Liu
  • Re: [Oslc-Automation] Consider pub/sub for asynchronized automation request Pramod K Chandoria
  • Re: [Oslc-Automation] Consider pub/sub for asynchronized automation request Xin Peng Liu
• [Oslc-Automation] Scheduling next round of OSLC Automation workgroup meetings - please read Michael F Fiedler
• [Oslc-Automation] OSLC Automation workgroup meeting cancelled for May 31 Michael F Fiedler
• [Oslc-Automation] Reminder: OSLC Automation workgroup meeting tomorrow (24 May) at 1PM Eastern US time Michael F Fiedler
  • [Oslc-Automation] Automation Request and Automation Result relationship Pramod K Chandoria
• [Oslc-Automation] recovery/error handling John Arwe
  • Re: [Oslc-Automation] recovery/error handling Michael F Fiedler
• [Oslc-Automation] Reminder: OSLC Automation workgroup meeting tomorrow (17 May) at 10:00AM Eastern US Michael F Fiedler
• [Oslc-Automation] HTTP method table John Arwe
  • Re: [Oslc-Automation] HTTP method table Michael F Fiedler
  • Re: [Oslc-Automation] HTTP method table Charles Rankin
  • Re: [Oslc-Automation] HTTP method table John Arwe
  • Re: [Oslc-Automation] HTTP method table Paul McMahan
  • [no subject] Xin Peng Liu
• [Oslc-Automation] Reminder: OSLC Automation workgroup meeting tomorrow (10 May) at 1PM Eastern US Michael F Fiedler
• [Oslc-Automation] Request for review of OSLC Automation specification Michael F Fiedler
  • Re: [Oslc-Automation] Request for review of OSLC Automation specification Pramod K Chandoria
  • Re: [Oslc-Automation] Request for review of OSLC Automation specification John Arwe
  • Re: [Oslc-Automation] Request for review of OSLC Automation specification Pramod K Chandoria
  • Re: [Oslc-Automation] Request for review of OSLC Automation specification John Arwe
  • Re: [Oslc-Automation] Request for review of OSLC Automation specification Pramod K Chandoria
  • Re: [Oslc-Automation] [oslc-core] Request for review of OSLC Automation specification David N Brauneis
  • Re: [Oslc-Automation] [oslc-core] Request for review of OSLC Automation specification Pramod K Chandoria
  • Re: [Oslc-Automation] [oslc-core] Request for review of OSLC Automation specification David N Brauneis
  • [Oslc-Automation] Email formatting style and plain text (was: Re: [oslc-core] Request for review of OSLC Automation specification) Steve K Speicher
  • Re: [Oslc-Automation] [oslc-core] Request for review of OSLC Automation specification Michael F Fiedler
  • Re: [Oslc-Automation] [oslc-core] Request for review of OSLC Automation specification John Arwe
  • Re: [Oslc-Automation] [oslc-core] Request for review of OSLC Automation specification Michael F Fiedler
• [Oslc-Automation] Important Automation Spec updates requiring review by Thursday - Part 2 Support for the synchronous automation scenario Michael F Fiedler
  • Re: [Oslc-Automation] Important Automation Spec updates requiring review by Thursday - Part 2 Support for the synchronous automation scenario John Arwe
• [Oslc-Automation] Important Automation Spec updates requiring review by Thursday - Part 1 in/out parameter definitions Michael F Fiedler
• [Oslc-Automation] Potential new requirement John Arwe
  • Re: [Oslc-Automation] Potential new requirement Paul McMahan
  • Re: [Oslc-Automation] Potential new requirement Charles Rankin
  • Re: [Oslc-Automation] Potential new requirement John Arwe
  • Re: [Oslc-Automation] Potential new requirement Michael F Fiedler
  • Re: [Oslc-Automation] Potential new requirement Charles Rankin
  • Re: [Oslc-Automation] Potential new requirement John Arwe
  • Re: [Oslc-Automation] Potential new requirement Vaibhav Srivastava
• [Oslc-Automation] Request for workgroup members to review update proposal for synchronous interactions Michael F Fiedler
• [Oslc-Automation] Reminder OSLC Automation Workgroup tomorrow (3 May) at 10:00 EDT Michael F Fiedler
• [Oslc-Automation] couple of typos in Automation draft John Arwe
• [Oslc-Automation] OSLC Automation workgroup meeting CANCELLED for tomorrow (26 April) Michael F Fiedler
• [Oslc-Automation] Rough draft of synch/asynch changes John Arwe
  • Re: [Oslc-Automation] Rough draft of synch/asynch changes John Arwe
• [Oslc-Automation] Thoughts on parameters Charles Rankin
  • Re: [Oslc-Automation] Thoughts on parameters - AutomationRequest, oslc_auto:initialParameter to oslc_auto:parameter. John Arwe
  • Re: [Oslc-Automation] Thoughts on parameters - AutomationResult, additional description on oslc_auto:initialParameter John Arwe
  • Re: [Oslc-Automation] Thoughts on parameters - new question on chained scenarios John Arwe
  • Re: [Oslc-Automation] Thoughts on parameters - AutomationResult, oslc_auto:additionalParameter to oslc_auto:parameter. John Arwe
  • Re: [Oslc-Automation] Thoughts on parameters - AutomationResult, oslc_auto:additionalParameter to oslc_auto:parameter. Michael F Fiedler
• [Oslc-Automation] AUTO: Paul Meharg is out of the office. (returning 04/23/2012) Paul Meharg
• [Oslc-Automation] Reminder: OSLC Automation workgroup meeting tomorrow (19 April) at 10AM Eastern US time Michael F Fiedler
• [Oslc-Automation] Reminder: OSLC Automation workgroup meeting tomorrow (Thursday, 12 April) at 1PM Eastern US Michael F Fiedler
• [Oslc-Automation] output parameters John Arwe
  • Re: [Oslc-Automation] output parameters Michael F Fiedler
• [Oslc-Automation] Automation Plan parameters - in vs out John Arwe
  • Re: [Oslc-Automation] Automation Plan parameters - in vs out Michael F Fiedler
  • Re: [Oslc-Automation] Automation Plan parameters - in vs out John Arwe
• [Oslc-Automation] Spec/Example comments: Automation Plan, parameter definition John Arwe
  • Re: [Oslc-Automation] Spec/Example comments: Automation Plan, parameter definition Michael F Fiedler
• [Oslc-Automation] Reminder: OSLC Automation workgroup meeting tomorrow (Thurs, 05 April) at 10 AM Eastern US Michael F Fiedler
• [Oslc-Automation] AUTO: Min Li is out of the office (returning 04/05/2012) Min Li
• [Oslc-Automation] HTTP method support John Arwe
  • Re: [Oslc-Automation] HTTP method support Michael F Fiedler
• [Oslc-Automation] how does a client find the automation result corresponding to the request it created? John Arwe
  • Re: [Oslc-Automation] how does a client find the automation result corresponding to the request it created? Michael F Fiedler
• [Oslc-Automation] Review comments welcome for OSLC Automation 2.0 specification Michael F Fiedler
• [Oslc-Automation] Spec feedback - item 4 John Arwe
• [Oslc-Automation] Spec feedback John Arwe
• [Oslc-Automation] Reminder: OSLC Automation workgroup meeting tomorrow (Thursday, 22 March) at 10:00AM Eastern US Daylight Savings Time Michael F Fiedler
• [Oslc-Automation] spec typo? Either Reference or Inline phrase John Arwe
  • Re: [Oslc-Automation] spec typo? Either Reference or Inline phrase Michael F Fiedler
  • Re: [Oslc-Automation] spec typo? Either Reference or Inline phrase John Arwe
  • Re: [Oslc-Automation] spec typo? Either Reference or Inline phrase Michael F Fiedler
• [Oslc-Automation] Minutes from 15 March OSLC Automation workgroup meeting Michael F Fiedler
• [Oslc-Automation] AUTO: Paul Meharg is out of the office. (returning 03/19/2012) Paul Meharg
• [Oslc-Automation] Items for review + reminder: OSLC Automation workgroup meeting tomorrow (15 March) at 1PM Eastern US Time (EDT now) Michael F Fiedler
• [Oslc-Automation] Reminder: OSLC Automation workgroup meeting tomorrow (Thursday, 8 March) at 10:00 AM Eastern US Michael F Fiedler
• [Oslc-Automation] Reminder: OSLC Automation workgroup meeting tomorrow (23 February) Michael F Fiedler
• [Oslc-Automation] Re-visiting Automation Result contributions Michael F Fiedler
• [Oslc-Automation] Automation Specification version #? Michael F Fiedler
  • Re: [Oslc-Automation] Automation Specification version #? Charles Rankin
  • Re: [Oslc-Automation] Automation Specification version #? Paul McMahan
  • Re: [Oslc-Automation] Automation Specification version #? Vaibhav Srivastava
• [Oslc-Automation] regrets for today's mtg John Arwe
• [Oslc-Automation] Reminder: OSLC Automation workgroup meeting tomorrow (16 Feb) at 10AM Eastern US time Michael F Fiedler
• [Oslc-Automation] Minutes from 9 February OSLC Automation workgroup meeting Michael F Fiedler
• [Oslc-Automation] Proposal for parameter definitions Michael F Fiedler
• [Oslc-Automation] OSLC Automation workgroup meeting moved to 1:30PM Eastern US time. Michael F Fiedler
• [Oslc-Automation] Reminder: OSLC Automation workgroup meets Thursday, 9 Feb at 1PM Eastern US time Michael F Fiedler
• [Oslc-Automation] Propose: Supported scenario and examples page on Wiki? Vaibhav Srivastava
  • Re: [Oslc-Automation] Propose: Supported scenario and examples page on Wiki? Michael F Fiedler
  • Re: [Oslc-Automation] Propose: Supported scenario and examples page on Wiki? Vaibhav Srivastava
• [Oslc-Automation] Reminder: OSLC automation workgroup cancelled for today Michael F Fiedler
• [Oslc-Automation] Proposal to postpone tomorrow's OSLC automation meeting by 1 week Michael F Fiedler
• [Oslc-Automation] Mylyn Builds-OSLC Connector Use Case Lucas Panjer
• [Oslc-Automation] OSLC Automation workgroup meeting agenda for 26 January Michael F Fiedler
• [Oslc-Automation] Comments on current draft specification Charles Rankin
  • Re: [Oslc-Automation] Comments on current draft specification Michael F Fiedler
• [Oslc-Automation] AUTO: Min Li is out of the office (returning 01/31/2012) Min Li

• Earlier messages
• Later messages