> > The Core spec seems out-of-sync. I see three variants of the namespace: > > 1. http://open-services.net/xmlns/oslc# > 2. http://open-services.net/xmlns/oslc-core# > 3. http://open-services.net/xmlns/oslc-core-1.0# > > I assumed #1 was a type so I changed them to #2. Then I saw a statement > about #3 in [1] > > I suggest we just define this as in [1], and then use prefixed names > beginning with oslc: everywhere else. > > [1] > http://open-services.net/bin/view/Main/OSLCCoreSpecDRAFT? > sortcol=table;up=#Defining_a_an_OSLC_resource >
Why not keep it simple and just use "http://open-services.net/xmlns/oslc#"; and the "oslc:" prefix? Is there a need to say "core" or a need for the version in the namespace?
