On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 3:13 PM, Scott Bosworth <[email protected]> wrote: >> The Core spec seems out-of-sync. I see three variants of the namespace: >> >> 1. http://open-services.net/xmlns/oslc# >> 2. http://open-services.net/xmlns/oslc-core# >> 3. http://open-services.net/xmlns/oslc-core-1.0# >> >> I assumed #1 was a type so I changed them to #2. Then I saw a statement >> about #3 in [1]
Sounds like we have some consensus that #1 is best and I agree. I'll go through the spec now and make sure we use it everywhere. >> I suggest we just define this as in [1], and then use prefixed names >> beginning with oslc: everywhere else. Yes. We should use 'oslc' as the prefix that maps to our namespace URI. - Dave
