Hi. Le lundi 10 mai 2010 à 11:29 -0400, Dave a écrit : > >From the start, I wanted one Core spec document because the old > broken-up OSLC v1 specs seemed to hard to follow, and hard to print > out for offline reading because there were so many parts. But now, the > Core spec seems too long, difficult to edit and too long to print out, > which is a shame because the "core" part of the Core spec is only > about 30 pages. >
What about using turtle [0] or a similar easier to read (and more compact) form of RDF instead of XML/RDF ? Of course, some tools may be better implemented using XML, but for readability by humans, it might help to have turtle examples instead. And I believe some concepts might be better understood with clearest possible RDF, considering how difficult it has become to understand some current discussions in -core. Just my 2 cents, [0]: http://www.w3.org/TeamSubmission/turtle/ -- Olivier BERGER <[email protected]> http://www-public.it-sudparis.eu/~berger_o/ - OpenPGP-Id: 2048R/5819D7E8 Ingénieur Recherche - Dept INF Institut TELECOM, SudParis (http://www.it-sudparis.eu/), Evry (France)
