We do intend to have Turtle representation examples and, in fact, I'm working on that today (using Jena to generate Turtle from our RDF/XML examples).
- Dave On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 4:57 AM, Olivier Berger <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi. > > Le lundi 10 mai 2010 à 11:29 -0400, Dave a écrit : >> >From the start, I wanted one Core spec document because the old >> broken-up OSLC v1 specs seemed to hard to follow, and hard to print >> out for offline reading because there were so many parts. But now, the >> Core spec seems too long, difficult to edit and too long to print out, >> which is a shame because the "core" part of the Core spec is only >> about 30 pages. >> > > What about using turtle [0] or a similar easier to read (and more > compact) form of RDF instead of XML/RDF ? > > Of course, some tools may be better implemented using XML, but for > readability by humans, it might help to have turtle examples instead. > > And I believe some concepts might be better understood with clearest > possible RDF, considering how difficult it has become to understand some > current discussions in -core. > > Just my 2 cents, > > [0]: http://www.w3.org/TeamSubmission/turtle/ > -- > Olivier BERGER <[email protected]> > http://www-public.it-sudparis.eu/~berger_o/ - OpenPGP-Id: 2048R/5819D7E8 > Ingénieur Recherche - Dept INF > Institut TELECOM, SudParis (http://www.it-sudparis.eu/), Evry (France) > > > _______________________________________________ > Oslc-Core mailing list > [email protected] > http://open-services.net/mailman/listinfo/oslc-core_open-services.net >
