I don't think 8 days is adequate amount of time for review. I suggest at least 2 weeks.
I don't also completely follow how you are proposing to make the changes. a) Are you planning to update RmSpecificationV2 with link to RmSpecificationV2r20110503Errata? b) Are you planning to make RmSpecificationV2r20110930 be the new RmSpecificationV2? This seems like the option you are suggesting. c) What is RmSpecificationV2r1? I can't find a reference to it. It would be helpful if the proposed changes in RmSpecificationV2r20110930 were reflected in the history so the diff could be reviewed. Would it be possible to redo the changes and force a new rev to be created when you apply this changes? Having said all that, RmSpecificationV2r20110930 seems like it a reasonable add to http://open-services.net/bin/view/Main/RmSpecificationV2?rev=45 but would like to see clear diff of what is being proposed. Thanks, Steve Speicher | IBM Rational Software | (919) 254-0645 > From: Ian Green1 <[email protected]> > To: [email protected], > Cc: [email protected] > Date: 09/22/2011 12:58 PM > Subject: [oslc-core] DRAFT of minor updates to RM 2.0 specification ready for review > Sent by: [email protected] > > Hello all > > The minor changes to the RM 2.0 specification that we've been discussing are > now in place, and ready for review. > The issue list at [1] describes what has been done and why, and links to the > affected pages. > I've created a new page RmSpecificationV2r20110930, which is the DRAFT RM 2. > 0 specification with the updates to account for the errata. > I've created a new page RmSpecificationV2r20100503, which is the RM 2.0 > specification we declared final on 3rd May 2011, but which also includes a > link to an errata, at RmSpecificationV2r20110503Errata, with previous and > next versions updated. This errata describes the vocabulary terms that are > being added. > You will notice that RmSpecificationV2r1 also has links the latest version > of the specification. The intention is that this will link to RmSpecificationV2. > When we are agreed that RmSpecificationV2r20110930 is what we want, > RmSpecificationV2 will be updated. > I ask you to review these proposed changes and let me know as soon as > possible by email if you in disagreement. Unless I hear of objections by > email I will action the above on 30 September and make these changes final. > > [1] http://open-services.net/bin/view/Main/RmSpecificationV2Issues > > best wishes, > -ian
