> Unless I hear of objections by email I will action the above on 30 September and make these changes final. Process issue: part of a transparent process is avoiding what are or even might reasonably appear to be unilateral decisions, even "small" ones like length of review period should be made at a working group meeting (Core, in this case). As I remember the last Core meeting, we agreed that you'd draft the diffs and Core members would review via email, nothing about length of review period (miss on our part) http://open-services.net/bin/view/Main/OslcCoreMeeting20110921 . Especially when we're treading in new territory (adding to an existing spec w/o a full new-version spec cycle), we need everyone to be comfortable with events and transparency + clarity are key.
Best Regards, John Voice US 845-435-9470 BluePages Tivoli OSLC Lead - Show me the Scenario
