Andy Berner Lead Architect, ISV Technical Enablement and Strategy IBM Rational Business Development 972 561-6599 [email protected]
Ready for IBM Rational software partner program - http://www.ibm.com/isv/rational/readyfor.html [email protected] wrote on 11/15/2011 01:32:59 PM: > John Arwe/Poughkeepsie/IBM@IBMUS asked > Not having been around for the bulk of the 2.0 spec stream > development, I'm wondering if I should/not read anything (and if I > should, what/how much) into which Dublin Core elements were > explicitly listed as common properties [1] vs those that were > omitted. dcterms:type provides a nice example. It is in Dublin > Core [2], it is used in CM 2.0 [3], but it is not in OSLC-common. > John, there are two "types" in the Change Request resource: One is the OSLC type (which is in the namespace rdf) which is part of the core spec The other is a CM specific property (though IMHO other specs such as RM should also adopt) which is the "type of change request" such as "Defect" or "Enhancement". That's not a core property, but does use dcterms:type.
