Specifically regarding dcterms:type: It looks like the range is
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#Class. I think perhaps dcterms:type
predated rdf:type and now is redundant.

I see this explaination here:

http://dublincore.org/documents/dc-rdf/

"The property dcterms:type has semantics very similar to rdf:type. At the
time of writing, the precise relationship between those properties remains
undecided.
It is recommended that RDF applications implementing this specification
primarily use and understand rdf:type in place of dcterms:type when
expressing Dublin Core metadata in RDF, as most RDF processors come with
built-in knowledge of rdf:type."

The OSLC-CM spec uses dcterms:type as a label for the type, but I'm not
sure that's right.
--
Best Regards,
Samuel Padgett | IBM Rational | [email protected]


                                                                       
  From:       Andrew J Berner/Dallas/IBM@IBMUS                         
                                                                       
  To:         John Arwe/Poughkeepsie/IBM@IBMUS,                        
                                                                       
  Cc:         [email protected], [email protected]
                                                                       
  Date:       11/15/2011 03:06 PM                                      
                                                                       
  Subject:    Re: [oslc-core] was dcterms:type intentionally omitted from 
Core's        common properties?
                                                                       
  Sent by:    [email protected]                      
                                                                       





Andy Berner
Lead Architect, ISV Technical Enablement and Strategy
IBM Rational Business Development
972 561-6599
[email protected]

Ready for IBM Rational software partner program -
http://www.ibm.com/isv/rational/readyfor.html

[email protected] wrote on 11/15/2011 01:32:59 PM:


> John Arwe/Poughkeepsie/IBM@IBMUS asked

> Not having been around for the bulk of the 2.0 spec stream
> development, I'm wondering if I should/not read anything (and if I
> should, what/how much) into which Dublin Core elements were
> explicitly listed as common properties [1] vs those that were
> omitted.  dcterms:type provides a nice example.  It is in Dublin
> Core [2], it is used in CM 2.0 [3], but it is not in OSLC-common.
>

John, there are two "types" in the Change Request resource:

One is the OSLC type (which is in the namespace rdf) which is part of the
core spec
The other is a CM specific property (though IMHO other specs such as RM
should also adopt) which is the "type of change request" such as "Defect"
or "Enhancement".  That's not a core property, but does use dcterms:type.


_______________________________________________
Oslc-Core mailing list
[email protected]
http://open-services.net/mailman/listinfo/oslc-core_open-services.net





Reply via email to