Steve, My reply is [1]. I think I disagree with you.
For Example 2, the occurence constraint is one or many. Therefore zero is NOT allowed. For Example 3, Either means that both representations are valid, i.e. the resource is "inlined" or just references via URI. Both client and server must be able to handle both representations. [1] http://open-services.net/pipermail/oslc-core_open-services.net/2012-April/001299.html Regards, ___________________________________________________________________________ Arthur Ryman DE, Chief Architect, Reporting & Portfolio Strategy and Management IBM Software, Rational Toronto Lab | +1-905-413-3077 (office) | +1-416-939-5063 (mobile) |------------> | From: | |------------> >--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| |Steve K Speicher/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS | >--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| |------------> | To: | |------------> >--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| |Arthur Ryman <[email protected]> | >--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| |------------> | Cc: | |------------> >--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| |[email protected] | >--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| |------------> | Date: | |------------> >--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| |04/20/2012 11:23 AM | >--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| |------------> | Subject: | |------------> >--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| |Re: [oslc-core] Fw: what is the actual intent of resource definition table columns? | >--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| Perhaps its best to look at it in the archive: http://open-services.net/pipermail/oslc-core_open-services.net/2012-April/001292.html I only was trying to capture the intent as stated. Arthur Ryman <[email protected]> wrote on 04/20/2012 11:18:56 AM: > From: Arthur Ryman <[email protected]> > To: Steve K Speicher/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS, > Cc: [email protected], [email protected] > Date: 04/20/2012 11:19 AM > Subject: Re: [oslc-core] Fw: what is the actual intent of resource > definition table columns? > > Steve, > > I replied in a separate note. The attached note is very hard to parse. If > you'd like a vote, could you summarize your assessment? Thx. > > Regards, > ___________________________________________________________________________ > > Arthur Ryman
